Pew: strong support for DADT repeal

Timothy Kincaid

November 29th, 2010

The Pew Forum released a poll today which continues to document the public’s support for repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

As the Pentagon prepares to release its highly anticipated survey of military personnel about the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, most Americans (58%) say they favor allowing homosexuals to serve openly in the armed forces. Fewer than half that number (27%) oppose allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly.

That is a fairly static statistic, with little change over the past five years. And, as has been the case for years, support for repeal is broad with strong Democrat support and nearly as many Republicans favoring repeal as opposing it.

It is sad to see politicians pandering to a subset of a demographic to continue discrimination that is not wanted by the American people.

Chris McCoy

November 29th, 2010

Is it really any surprise to whom politicians are pandering?

Republican – 40%
65+ – 44%
White evangelical – 34%
Attend church weekly or more – 40%

Chris McCoy

November 29th, 2010

Among all Republicans and Republican leaners, those who agree with the Tea Party are less supportive of allowing gays to serve openly than are those who disagree with the Tea Party or have no opinion of the movement.

Only about four-in-ten (38%) Republicans and Republican leaners who agree with the Tea Party favor allowing gays to serve openly while 48% are opposed. Among those who disagree with the Tea Party or have no opinion of the movement, 52% favor letting gays serve openly and just 30% are opposed.

Ryan

November 29th, 2010

The thing that Republican senators know, is that the majority of Republicans who are against repeal will be angry enough at a GOP senator who votes for it to vote against him or her in the primaries. And in a general election, Independents aren’t likely to base their vote on whether or not the GOP candidate voted for repeal, even if they’re personally against DADT. That’s why I suspect Lindsay Graham is correct when he says all the GOP senators will vote against repeal. There’s no upside to voting for repeal, and they will almost certainly face an angry Tea Party challenge in their next primary.

KZ

November 29th, 2010

…and the Senator McCain this poll means absolutely nothing.

Dan

November 29th, 2010

Only one group has a majority in opposition to repeal: conservative Republicans at 52%. For this group, even the minority that favors repeal, 28%, is attenuated by a large number of don’t knows: 19%. Moderate and liberal Republicans together are 62% in favor.

White evangelicals have 48% opposed, a relatively high number though not a majority. As with conservative Republicans, many respondents say they don’t know: 17%.

Outside conservative Republicans and white evangelicals, no group could be considered to show strong opposition. People who attend church weekly come closest, but they’re evenly divided with an unusually high 21% saying they don’t know. The 65+ age group has only 28% opposed, with an exceptionally high 28% saying they don’t know.

I would like to see results for conservatives as a group, as opposed to just conservative Republicans. My guess is that any really strong opposition will be found there. I’d also like to see the results broken down into “strongly favor,” “somewhat favor,” and so on.

In any case, the Republicans in congress must be pandering to their conservative base, which includes many white evangelicals. It’s strange, because you’d think they’d want to broaden their appeal. A few might start doing that by voting to repeal DADT.

They could also be trying to keep the Democrats from getting anything done. We’ll know more after the upcoming vote.

The large “don’t know” groups suggest to me that a lot of people are conflicted. Some of the respondents who are most prejudiced against gay people may also have the highest regard for those who are willing to fight and possibly die for their country.

Donnchadh

November 30th, 2010

McCain is at least ahead of his colleagues in disdaining public opinion on this issue.
With the tide turning against them, opponents of gay marriage will soon have to give up on the “right of the people to vote” rhetoric and switch to “marriage is a sacrament that transcends politics and should not be put to a vote”.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1919: First Pro-Gay Film Released

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Emphasis Mine

Today In History, 1948: "Homosexual Ring Broken Up" At Mizzou

Today In History, 1960: Daughters of Bilitis Hold First National Convention

Today In History, 1969: "One Profession Frowned Upon In Hollywood"

Today In History, 1993: Russia Decriminalizes Homosexuality

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.