Republicans Unite To Doom DADT Repeal

The opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of other authors at Box Turtle Bulletin.

Jim Burroway

December 1st, 2010

That’s according to a letter signed by all 42 Senate Republicans to Sen. Majority Leader Harry Read:

…Republicans informed their Democratic counterparts they would not go forward with “any legislative item until the Senate has acted to fund the government and we have prevented the tax increase that is currently awaiting all American taxpayers.”

The letter goes on: “With little time left in this Congressional session, legislative scheduling should be focused on these critical priorities. While there are other items that might ultimately be worthy of the Senate’s attention, we cannot agree to prioritize any matters above the critical issues of funding the government and preventing a job-killing tax hike.” 

Given the high political stakes behind the extension of the Bush’s budget busting tax cuts, it’s unlikely that the GOP-induced logjam will be broken anytime soon before time runs out. All of those GOP Senators who claimed they would vote to repeal DADT?  As far as I can see, it was nothing but vacuous political posturing. So what else is new?


December 1st, 2010

B-B-But, what about the study?! I thought they were waiting for the “study” before deciding! Oh yeah, they’re all gay hating liars. How silly of me!


December 1st, 2010

I’m wondering how the apologists will find a way to blame Reid again.


December 1st, 2010

Yet isn’t DADT repeal attached to the NDAA which funds DoD? Call their bluff.

David F.

December 1st, 2010

As much as I would love to see DADT repealed, I have to agree that funding the government and a few other things are more pressing. I may be selfish, but was told that I only have 1 more week of unemployment benefits left unless Congress gets off the stick and funds it. Not just me but a lot of others are in the same boat.


December 1st, 2010

David F, read it again. You won’t be getting your unemployment checks unless the millionaires and billionaires get their tax cuts extended. “DADT or unemployment extensions” are a false choice the republicans just now invented to run out the clock on repeal. There’s no reason why the Senate couldn’t do both, but now the GOP will make damn sure they won’t do either.


December 1st, 2010

Tie DADT-repeal to the tax cuts. I know Reid blinked when the Repugs threatened to filibuster a Defense Authorization Bill. Let ’em try. Why is it that the Dems always blink? Attach it to the tax cuts. If the GOP filibusters, I strongly believe the people will excoriate them, not Reid.


December 1st, 2010

This is yet another stalling tactic. They’re just trying to run out the clock to make sure nothing happens in the Lame Duck session.

In fact, the two things that they want are mutually contradictory. To fund the government, they must repeal the tax cuts for the wealthy, to keep the tax cuts for the wealthy, they must bankrupt the government.

Lindoro Almaviva

December 1st, 2010

So there you have it,for the republicans it is more important to save the pockets of those who fund them than to ensure all citizens are treated equally.


December 1st, 2010

If only Obama could have predicted that saving DADT repeal for the lame duck session might end badly.


December 1st, 2010

I don’t know about you guys, but I think it’s more important to have LGBT people serving without problems than giving the government that discriminates against us more money.

Mark F.

December 1st, 2010

There is no good reason the Democrats shouldn’t agree to a temporary extension of all of the Bush tax cuts. I agree with the GOP. Extend the tax cuts, then vote on the other issues.

John in the Bay Area

December 1st, 2010

Funny that the Democrats haven’t voted 10 times this year to extend the Bush tax cuts for those making less than $250,000. They would have been able to say in campaign commercials that these Republican senators voted 10 times to raise taxes on middle class Americans.

The Republicans appear to know how to play hard ball, the Democrats not so much.

Also, no Democratic senator is going to filibuster the Defense Authorization Bill if Don’t Ask Don’t Tell repeal isn’t in the bill.


December 1st, 2010

@Mark F,

The GOP thinks you’re a bum who has no incentive to get a job if your unemployment checks continue. They’re not trying to help you out, here. Do you not really get that? And if you’re gay, well…it’s pretty apparent what Republicans think of gays.


December 2nd, 2010

“Why is it that the Dems always blink?”

Because that’s what democrats in the federal government always DO. It’s part of the job description.

Paul J. Stein

December 2nd, 2010

Well it is very simple. The republicans have a job, benefits, and have no interest in helping anyone who didn’t contribute to campaigns. They did the unemployment compensation in the T.A.R.P. bill for their party members. Bankers, insurance co. executives, wall street hedge fund managers. Screw the rest of the usa that pays their salary.


December 2nd, 2010

This is Extortion. Republicans vote against the will of the American People.

Let the Republicans shut down the Government! We will vote out all 42 Senators at the next election. Tell them so:

The best predictor of Future Bahavior is Past Behavior. Jobs have not been created by the current tax cuts, and more tax cuts for the rich will not start creating jobs all of a sudden,…

Neither will thge Republicans start to work with Obama all of a sudden. Obama has nothing to gain by caving on this issue.

Don’t give Rich People disproportionately advantageous tax cuts!


December 2nd, 2010

Thank you, Log Cabin Rethuglicans. Now, please take your knife out of my back.

Jim Burroway

December 2nd, 2010

If anything, LCR is being pretty effective in their efforts to get DADT off the law books through their so far successful lawsuit against the U.S. government. It’s the Obama administration that continues to appeal the decision to the 9th circuit court.


December 2nd, 2010

He’s obviously appealing it in the 9th because Gates is afraid a blanket finding that DADT is unconstitutional will disrupt the military in a way that a Congressional repeal of DADT won’t. And I’m sure he’s right. As long as there’s a chance of Congressional repeal, Obama should continue to appeal the ruling. But now that we know for certain that there’s no chance of Congressional repeal and Collins et al were lying through their teeth when they said they were considering repeal, and we know with 100% certainty that Servicemembers United were dead wrong when they claimed they had the votes in October (I don’t believe they were lying, just being lied to), Obama should stop all appeals. There’s literally no other way for this to get done. The GOP-led House would sooner commit mass suicide than vote pro-repeal (and indeed, it would be political suicide for them to do so).
And you’re right, Jim, the LCR have been effective in fighting this in the courts. Thank goodness Obama was elected. It’s hard to imagine they would’ve brought the case forward against a Republican president or DOJ.
I’m curious as to why Timothy Kincaid has yet to chime in on this.

Mark F.

December 7th, 2010

Yes, I get it. GOP evil, Democrats good. Rolls eyes.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.