Box Turtle Bulletin

idiot

Regan DuCasse

What would he say to a Jehovah’s Witness soldier about blood donation to another soldier or about receiving it?
This is a case of bigotry trying to find a place where it doesn’t belong.

This chaplain IS all of the above, a liar, bigoted AND stupid.
Being faithful doesn’t mean you get to lose IQ points in the process.

John in the Bay Area

It seems that these sorts of chaplains may be a far greater threat to unit cohesion and good discipline than open service by gay and lesbian servicemembers.

Ben in Atlanta

Since there have always been servicemembers of all sexual orientations, knowing instead of just suspecting won’t make anti-gay chaplains any less effective godless bastards. God is not American and doesn’t even hate the enemies of the USA. The borders that separate us aren’t put there by God. Although the serial numbers may have been filed off and it may be altered beyond recognition the major religion of the USA is stolen.

Edwin

Inever met a chaplin when i was in the service that was worth a damn anyway. The only reason I could see them in there is for the good pay and rank.
If this major doesn’t like the way things ARE going tohappen then get out.

Lindoro Almaviva

I vote for all three

David Foreman

I’ve known enough of these folks that I have serious doubts about calling him a liar. Bigot? Yes. Stupid? Yes. Liar, probably not. At least not in his own eyes.

>What would he say to a Jehovahâ€™s Witness soldier about blood donation to another soldier or about receiving it?

JW’s don’t serve in the military, it’s against their religious beliefs.

I’m guessing Jewish and Muslim chaplains don’t go around telling Christian soldiers to not eat pork. Maybe I’m wrong, but I thought that chaplains were there to support the spiritual needs of the soldiers (for prayer, confession, etc), not evangelize their particular faith.

Anna

Jeez Louise…

A chaplain’s “duty to [their] troops” is to accommodate the soldier’s beliefs, not the other way around.

Jafuf

No, he’s just obviously a closet queen who has spent most of his sex life in public utilities.

Hunter

“Frankly, Reverend, either you are a liar, a bigot, or an idiot.”

I think we have a trifecta here — have you noticed how often the three go together?

Y’know, if hating gays is the only article of his faith, how can he call himself a Christian? I’d love to know how he deals with not being able to preach that “thou shall not suffer a witch to live,” considering that not only are there Wiccan troops, but the chaplain’s handbook has a section on their practices and rituals.

To R and Anna: You haven’t taken a good look at our military lately: officers proselytizing in their commands is part of the gig, as far as they’re concerned.

John

Why are these chaplins allowed in the service, anyway. Military chaplins are supposedly there to meet the spiritual needs of service members and not to dictate morality. If these chaplins really cared about morality, why are they there in support for killing people? Isn’t one of the Ten Commandments not to kill?

RWG

The objection to repeal now is the looming prospect of the US Armed forces training its soldiers, sailors and air forces in acceptance, tolerance and respect for gays and lesbians. That training, most often given to young, impressionable minds, will seep out of the military and into society at large, increasing the acceptance of gay and lesbian Americans. That would undermine the message of the religious zealots who are trying to impose a Christian theocracy on America, and cost them both money and power. If gay and lesbian Americans are allowed to serve, inevitably, the question will be asked, “if the can serve their country like anyone else, why shouldn’t they have the same rights as everyone else?” That’s a question they haters don’t want to have to answer. Lastly, the prospect of an openly gay Medal of Honor winner is their nightmare.

del

It’s amazing how quickly most of these comments jump to juvenile tactics to “respond” to an opposing view. The point Lee was making was that if (for example) a Muslim chaplain was not allowed to preach, teach or counsel a Muslim troop the Islamic doctrine that homosexuality is immoral, then the Muslim troop is short-changed and his constitutional, free exercise right to worship is abridged.

Curt

How much do you want to bet that chaplains will comply, because it’s an easy gig for them.

I had always understood that chaplains were non-denominational and did not try to convert the troops to their beliefs anyway.

IamPosterity

I am going with idiot on this one! Hello…. http://www.wouldjesusdiscriminate.com we already know the bible is not against us it’s the church itself. UGH!

ZRAinSWVA

del, similarly, if a Christian preacher is not allowed to preach, teach or counsel a Christian troop the Christian doctrine that those practicing Islam are immoral, wrong and heathens, then the Christian troop is short-changed and his constitutional, free exercise right to worship is abridged.

Ya think?

Paul J. Stein

Lazy egomaniacs should also be added to the list. I only saw one chaplain that was worth a damn, MORMON but with a sense of fairness that pissed off the church ELDERS in SLC with every discussion I ever had with him.

Regan DuCasse

Hi R!
That’s my point. JW’s, some of them, cite their religious beliefs that gays shouldn’t serve either.

Well, SOMEBODY has to strap up and serve to protect the nation.
If JW’s don’t want to.
And don’t want gay people to either, then where does that leave anyone?

The very people, who use their religious beliefs as a rationale for discrimination, aren’t too inclined to do the job that a gay person is willing to do.

That’s when we can tell them YOU do it, or STFU.

AdrianT

It’s high time non believing military members started evangelizing to chaplains about how Charles Darwin answered life’s questions far better, and bombarded these idiots with books by dawkins and bertrand russell. Chaplains should have NO say on anything, beyond the order of service for the small minority of people who want to attend.

the first amendment, the virginia statute guarantees people freedom from this superstitious tosh.

Timothy Kincaid

Del,

The point Lee was making was that if (for example) a Muslim chaplain was not allowed to preach, teach or counsel a Muslim troop the Islamic doctrine that homosexuality is immoral, then the Muslim troop is short-changed and his constitutional, free exercise right to worship is abridged.

Yes, and if he were forced to balance ripe cheese on his head then his hair would stink.

But, of course, there is no threat of either.

Hunter

del —

Lee is making the kind of argument so favored by the right, the argument by dire consequences. You can predict almost any result from, for example, allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the armed forces, and scare a lot of people, and no one can refute you because there’s no way to do so.

So maybe if he could come up with some evidence supporting this “strong possibility” that chaplains are going to be forbidden to counsel their co-believers on the tenets of their faith — which in this instance seems to amount to “gays are icky” — he might have a little more credibility.

Remember, Elaine Donnelley, who specializes in this kind of argument, got laughed at the last time she was called to testify before a committee on DADT. That’s about the right response.

Amicus

I believe it was in the poll of spouses/families that the figure of 12% came up for chaplains, as the number of people who would turn to them if a question about the repeal of DADT came up post repeal.

Just sayin’.

L. Junius Brutus

Del: “Itâ€™s amazing how quickly most of these comments jump to juvenile tactics to â€œrespondâ€ to an opposing view. The point Lee was making was that if (for example) a Muslim chaplain was not allowed to preach, teach or counsel a Muslim troop the Islamic doctrine that homosexuality is immoral, then the Muslim troop is short-changed and his constitutional, free exercise right to worship is abridged.”

What brilliant logic! I guess Muslim troops would also be short-charged and their constitutional free exercise right to worship abridged if the chaplain failed to tell them the Islamic doctrine that Muslims are obliged to fight against the unbelievers until they are subdued. Who taught you constitutional law? Sarah Palin?

Chaplains are government employees and they have no free speech rights. If they don’t like it, they can get out.

John

We had a an a-hole for a chaplain when I was in Basic. I can still recall his using the allegations against 1 dead sailor being gay to blame him, and by extension all “perverts”, for the 1989 explosion on the battleship Iowa. That I was forced to stand at attention listening to this supposed man of God and a-hole slander the reputation of a fellow sailor killed in what by then was widely suspected to be an accident and not some gay love affair gone wrong, really soured me on clerics being given officer rank. This sailor was killed in an accident like the other victims were, not because he was some suicidal gay freak as the Navy was trying to say until forced to retract that asinine theory. I never had anything else to do with chaplains the rest of my time in the service.

Donny D.

RWG said,

“The objection to repeal now is the looming prospect of the US Armed forces training its soldiers, sailors and air forces in acceptance, tolerance and respect for gays and lesbians. That training, most often given to young, impressionable minds, will seep out of the military and into society at large, increasing the acceptance of gay and lesbian Americans.”

Yes, and it would directly influence the most politically and culturally conservative sectors of the population, because that’s who tend to be in the military.

Mark F.