Brown backs standalone DADT repeal, assures filibuster proof support

Timothy Kincaid

December 16th, 2010

Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) has announced that now that the tax rate extensions have been resolved, he will support the DADT repeal. (ABC)

Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown today voiced his support for a stand-alone repeal of the military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, bringing the bill one vote over the 60-vote threshold that it will need to reach if and when the Senate votes on the measure in the coming weeks.

“Sen. Brown accepts the Pentagon’s recommendation to repeal the policy after proper preparations have been completed. If and when a clean repeal bill comes up for a vote, he will support it,” said Brown spokesperson Gail Gitcho.

Now the only thing holding up the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is timing. Anti-gay senators may try to run out the clock, but Sen. Lieberman believes that there is enough time even will allowable stalling tactics. We will see whether Sen. Reid will prioritize the DADT repeal and allow it to pass or put it low enough on the agenda that it is killed for at least the next two years.

Lindoro Almaviva

December 16th, 2010

A man of priorities I see. Now that his rich friends are taken care of (and presumably will line his pocket with donations as thank you gifts) he can take the time to address and correct the fact that people in this country are still not treated equally.

Given his behavior, it is all too well what was written: we are all born equal, just some are more equal than others.

Ryan

December 16th, 2010

More accurately, we’ll see if the Republicans are able to delay the vote or not. Blaming Reid if they succeed is pretty beyond the pale.

AdrianT

December 16th, 2010

If the Senate does not repeal – the courts will. The Senate’s vote is merely a rubber stamp. It cannot be stressed enough.

Though, it must be said, if 3,000 LGBT servicemembers simply came out en-masse, the law would be irrelevant. An advertisement, saying that ‘we the above, refuse to serve under DADT’ in the WaPo would do it. Strength in numbers.

james

December 16th, 2010

well newsites are reporting some dem. senator has cancer and will probably miss the vote. mccain is saying he will definatly fillabuster… if there are enough votes does that mean they can overide his attempt??

Ryan

December 16th, 2010

Adrian, I don’t think the Supreme Court’s decision is a sure thing at all. And at any rate, it’s probably a year or so off. Especially when Kagan will likely have to recuse herself. And the odds of Obama winning again and the. Democrats retaking the House in 2012 are next to nothing. So repeal will either happen next month or 2016 or 2020. Or later, depending on the next big Democratic win. Hell, Republicans don’t even give a rat’s ass about health care who 9/11 First Responders who are dying of lung disease. That’s the morality of these people.

Ryan

December 16th, 2010

I mean “this month”, not next month, of course.

Matt

December 16th, 2010

Well there ya go. Heckuva job, Brownnie. Now Suzy Collins and her last-second slew of amendment demands can be considered irrelevant to the process.

And yet I still can’t help be reminded of that one Celebrity Jeopardy skit on SNL all those years ago where “Trebek” told the contestants, “There’s no possible way you can get this wrong. You’d have to be the dumbest people in the world to screw this up… And now let’s see how you managed to screw it up,”

@Adrian- I’d love to see that kind of “I Am Spartacus” type of action published or taken as a public statement, even if it’d be just as likely followed the next day by a similar letter signed by servicemembers in favor of keeping DADT. If nothing else, the lid would be off of the pot and people would be able to stop pretending that there aren’t any gays or lesbians serving in the armed forces right now.

customartist

December 17th, 2010

Republican Senators have collectively participated in Extortion, plain and simple, to obtain benefits for the Rich in lieu of passing any other legislation for the American People.

Well WHAT will the incoming Tea Partiers think about THAT?____________

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.