AZ Lawmakers Move to Limit Westboro Baptist Protests at Funerals

Jim Burroway

January 11th, 2011

Soon after Saturday’s heinous massacre of six Tucsonans and the injuring of fourteen others including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, Westboro Baptist’s Fred Phelps announced via video that the shooter, Jared Loughner, was appointed by Phelps’s god to do the evil deed and that the Westboro clan would protest the funerals. Arizona state Sen. Kirsten Sinema (D-Phoenix) swung into action:

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer has signed into law emergency legislation to head off picketing by a Topeka, Kan., church near the funeral service for a 9-year-old girl who was killed during Saturday’s shooting in Tucson. Unanimous votes by the House and Senate on Tuesday sent the bill to Brewer. It took effect immediately with her signature Tuesday night. The new law prohibits protests within 300 feet of a funeral or burial service.

…Arizona State Representative Kyrsten Sinema said when she heard of the plans, she got downright angry and decided to take action.  Sinema sponsored Senate Bill 1101 and got some help from fellow legislators.  “We patterned legislation after Ohio’s law which is constitutional, it’s been upheld in court, and I got permission from the speaker and the senate president to wave the rules,” Sinema said.

…”The bill requires them to be at least 300 feet away from the funeral from an hour before the funeral starts to an hour after it ends and that way people can grieve and love in peace,” Sinema said.

The bill passed the Arizona House and Senate in record time, and was signed into law at 3:00pm by Governor Brewer. The first funerals will take place on Thursday. The Boston-based Phelps-A-Thon has pledged to make a donation to Wingspan’s Anti-Violence Project of Southern Arizona for every funeral the Phelps clan protests. Wingspan is the LGBT community center for Tucson and southern Arizona. You can also donate directly to Wingspan here.

Meanwhile President Barack Obama has announced that he will speak at a community memorial service scheduled for tomorrow evening. The memorial begins at 6:00pm MST at the McKale Center on the University of Arizona campus.

Edwin

January 12th, 2011

That Phelps clan are from a hate preaching church. They shouldn’t even be allowed out of Kansas. The God I believe doesn’t preach hate like they do..I don’t understand how they can call themselves christians.

tim

January 12th, 2011

I find it sad that there are so many so willing to throw the Constitution under the bus the moment it becomes inconvenient.

The same laws that protect your speech protect theirs. Sorry guys – you can’t protect the one without the other.

Leonardo Ricardo

January 12th, 2011

Exactly! They must be allowed to protest (even better to see these thugs in public instead of the hidden deadly gang of really dangerous filth who occupy the more secretive establishments of the ¨C¨ Street ¨christians¨ radicals).

Jim Burroway

January 12th, 2011

As a clarification, they are allowed to protest. They just must remain 300 feet away. I’ve changed the headline to reflect that. This is similar to restrictions on protests at abortion clinics.

John

January 12th, 2011

Are they going to stick around to protest when Obama addresses the memorial service? That would give them the publicity they so crave.

justsearching

January 12th, 2011

These hatemongers are allowed to legally and openly give their spiel 100 meters away from funerals and yet some are worried that they’re not being given enough? In a few areas of public life such as at and near abortion clinics, on public transportation systems, and at funerals I think we ought to respect people’s freedom from speech.

Priya Lynn

January 12th, 2011

I can’t get over what a heartless scumbag this guy is.

Regan DuCasse

January 12th, 2011

People like the Phelps, use their 1st amendment right in such a way as pushing the line to provocation, harassment and incitement.
This is not protected speech. And the reason why, is so that one’s own and the safety of others isn’t compromised.

The Phelps force local law enforcers to circle them, and protect them from their own excess. Whose costs, should be incurred by the Phelps.
After all, this isn’t about their own locality or taxes or personal NEED for expression of grievances to their government.

This is a matter of people who insist on being pests, during a time when emotions and pain are at their zenith.

It becomes ever more difficult to keep a line of protection between some people and their speech.
Indeed, the debate on this tragedy is addressing one head of the hydra. The kinds of incitement that extends to eventual, and mostly PREDICTABLE violence.

We know there is a distinct connection between anti gay speech, and anti gay violence.

The Phelps are perhaps the most notorious pests, and don’t pick their targets that have the strength or interest in challenging them, but they choose a specific time to come around when people are most likely to want to do some physical damage to them.
Why would you come around to pour salt on a wounded person?
Two reasons:
You know that someone will be between them and your own safety.

I think, rather than try and create laws that keep the Phelps away, I’d say make THEM pay for doing it. Charge them a fee.
Just as Klan choose to march through black and Jewish neighborhoods to heighten the risk level, sometimes ignoring them isn’t an option.
Making them pay to play is.

Michael Ejercito

January 12th, 2011

As a clarification, they are allowed to protest. They just must remain 300 feet away. I’ve changed the headline to reflect that. This is similar to restrictions on protests at abortion clinics.

Indeed, time, place, and manner restrictions are held to a lesser level of scrutiny than content restrictions.

This would be a borderline First Amendment case.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1895: Oscar Wilde Enters Bankruptcy

This Month In History, 1919: A Plea From An Invert

Born On This Day, 1966: Sean Patrick Maloney

Orlando-Area Republicans Back LGBT Protections

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Emphasis Mine

This Month In History, 1958: "My Daughter Is a Lesbian!"

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.