Maryland Delegate Carter holds gay community hostage

Timothy Kincaid

March 1st, 2011

Meet Jill Carter. Jill represents Baltimore. She believes that your rights and my rights are less important than her own personal political advancement. She also believes that extortion is an appropriate methodology for getting her way.

Jill Carter is an ideal example of what people find objectionable in politicians. From now on when you hear someone say, “they’re all crooks, out for themselves, and they care nothing about principles or the people,” Jill Carter’s face should come to mind.

Carter had signed on as a sponsor of the marriage equality bill in Maryland. Then she did a vote count and thought, “oh, my vote counts. Without my support gay people can be denied their civil equality, so I’ll use my vote as an extortion tool to get what I want.” (Baltimore Sun)

Carter was one of two delegates supportive of gay marriage who staged a walkout this morning during a specially scheduled vote on the marriage proposal — which has already cleared the Senate and had been expected to make it out of the House committee today.

But Carter said there are “more important, or at least equally important” issues that she would like to see fast-tracked in the way that, in her view, gay marriage has been. And she said that until she hears from House leadership, she does not plan to cast a committee vote in favor of the Civil Marriage Protection Act.

She is a critical vote: The House Judiciary Committee contains only exactly enough “yes” votes to get the same-sex marriage proposal out of committee and to the House floor for debate by the entire 141-member chamber.

What a really nasty piece of work.

Edwin

March 1st, 2011

Now if you want to talk aboutpolitical B*&^%#S then she is one. Who ever voted to put her in office got screwed big time. If she does this against gay people the straights better watch their backs. She will do this to anyone that gets in her way. Definately a crooked politian!!!

beachewtoy75

March 1st, 2011

i just find it odd that a drag queen might be against same sex marriage.

Tone

March 1st, 2011

This is about as close to influence peddling as she can get without a suitcase full of cash changing hands. If this isn’t outright illegal it certainly should spell political suicide for her. And what about her oath of office? Does she have no ethics at all? I am shocked, utterly shocked by this.

TampaZeke

March 1st, 2011

@beachewtoy75, I was thinking the exact same thing!

Jeremy

March 1st, 2011

What can we say, she has us by the you-know-what.

If there is any consolation here, it’s that IF this bill does eventually pass, that means less days for NOM to gather signatures for a referendum.

BTW, hopefully Marylanders, in addition to calling delegates, are also applying pressure to Gov. O’Malley.

ScottLanter

March 2nd, 2011

This witch sounds exactly like the fools in GOProud who opposed Obama on repealing DADT by saying they disagreed with the “process”. What scum.

customartist

March 2nd, 2011

Email Jill Carter & Tiffany Alston:

Tell them to please stop withholding your rights in lieu of their political gains, and that when they will not vote for you that it will be very difficult to vote for them. This is not a game!

*** Be Polite and to the point ***

jill.carter@house.state.md.us

tiffany.alston@house.state.md.us

Emelye Waldherr

March 2nd, 2011

I wonder which other bills Ms Carter was talking about when she said some other bills deserved to be fast tracked as well. Was it that horribly flawed bill, HB235, that would enshrine public accommodations discrimination against trans people while pretending to gove them civil rights protections in housing and employment? Was it the bill to increase the penalties for public accommodations discrimination that is already illegal (eg discrimination based on sexual orientation), thereby increasing the divide between LGB/straight cisgender people and trans LGB/straight people?

Politics is ugly and Ms Carter is playing hardball. Until we know which other bills she is pushing, I won’t judge her.

fannie

March 2nd, 2011

@beachewtoy75 and TampaZeke:

Try stepping up your game and criticizing a politician without using misogyny.

Women are part of the LGBT community too and many of us don’t appreciate the snide and petty commentary about a female politician’s looks.

TampaZeke

March 2nd, 2011

@fannie, get over yourself. You assume that I think negatively of drag queens. It’s actually YOUR ignorance and misogyny that is showing.

And she DOES look like a drag queen.

Priya Lynn

March 2nd, 2011

I’m with fannie.

fannie

March 2nd, 2011

TampaZeke,

This politician’s looks are not relevant to her stance on same-sex marriage or to this post. So, why even mention her looks? Given the history of female public figures having to deal with obsessions over their looks, their clothes, their shoes, and their hairstyles, it’s probably a good idea to stick to substance to avoid sending the wrong impression. No matter how you personally feel about drag queens.

And, on that point, you seem to be backtracking now and say that you intended your comment as a compliment.

A person can think positively of drag queens, yet still call a cisgender woman a drag queen as a way to insult her by saying she’s mannish, not sufficiently feminine-looking, or in some way not living up to the beauty standards for the ladies. Gay and straight people do this all the time to Ann Coulter and it’s rarely intended as a compliment.

Emelye Waldherr

March 3rd, 2011

After posting my message here I read on Pam’s House Blend about the bills Ms Carter was pushing. Since the bills she was holding out for have nothing to do with civil rights at all, I’m convinced she’s a craven politician whose attachment to her pet causes unfortunately rises above her commitment to equality for all deserving citizens.

I hope they can work it out soon and that she gets some payback in the near future.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1956: The Adjustment of Male Overt Homosexuals

Federal Judge Blocks UNC From Enforcing North Carolina's "Bathroom Bill"

Georgia Pastor Who Praised Orlando Shooting Arrested for Child Molestation

Maine's Governor Is the Epitome Of What's Wrong In The Republican Party

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1970: Protesters March, then Riot in Greenwich Village over Police Harassment

Born On This Day, 1844: Edward Carpenter

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.