VA Legislator Charges Fed With Promoting A “Class 6 Felony”

Jim Burroway

June 3rd, 2011

Virginia Delegate Robert G. Marshall (R-Prince William) sent a letter to the Richmond Federal Reserve Bank demanding that they remove the rainbow flag that is flying outside the building in honor of Pride month:

In a letter to Richmond Fed President Jeffrey M. Lacker, Marshall says the homosexual behavior “celebrated” by the bank “undermines the American economy” and is a class six felony in Virginia.

“The Richmond Fed’s endorsement of costly, anti-social, immoral behavior is rejected by 6,000 years of Western Religious and moral teaching,” writes Marshall, who is among the General Assembly’s most conservative members and has long been outspoken on gay-rights issues. “You want the American people to trust your [judgment] in economic matters when your spokesperson celebrates an attack on public morals?”

Marshal seems to have missed the memo in which the U.S. Supreme Court struck down sodomy laws in 2003’s Lawrence v. Texas.

Timothy Kincaid

June 3rd, 2011

Constitution? Smonstitution!

He’s all about protecting Teh Fambly

Bruce McRoberts

June 3rd, 2011

Remember what I said about “a state in two minds” in my last comment? This is what I meant. Fortunately, he’s insane even for the Rural Redneck Virginia half of the state, and the Fed seems to be relatively stolid so far.

John B. Chilton

June 3rd, 2011

How about a twitter campaign to offset the hate in the comments the article in eliciting?

Send the Richmond Fed a thank you and encouragment by tweeting them at

@RichmondFed

Jerry

June 3rd, 2011

I used to be a resident of of Virginia and in 1990 I watched the candidate I supported take his place as the first African American governor of Virginia. Barely 20 years ago and no we have these hate mongers holding the governor’s seat, Hoochy-Koochy-Nellie as attorney general and a plethora of flatulent gassbags in the legislature.

I’m so glad I moved.

PC

June 3rd, 2011

There’s been a Western religious and moral teaching for 6,000 years now?

Ooooooooooooh, he’s a young earth creationist. Gotcha.

Steven B

June 3rd, 2011

Yup, class 6 felony, still on the books in Virginia.

Mike Kevitt

June 3rd, 2011

The Fed. Res. is a Federal agency, so it has no business celebrating anything except its assigned function. But, that Virginia “law” against that flag is a violation of free speech, so it’s a criminal document. Plus, what a laugh!, all the “social” and other “costs” of homosexual activity, which anybody can engage in without fear of law, and has the RIGHT to engage in without fear of criminal documents and their criminal enforcers. And, any PRIVATE entity has the right to fly that flag.

Mike Kevitt

June 3rd, 2011

In my comment I just made, above, I made a factual mistake. It appears the “law” in question is against homosexual activity, not against that flag. But, it still violates the unalienable right of free association. It’s still a criminal ducument, not a law

Goodboy PA

June 4th, 2011

The statement by Delegate Marshall is absolutely true. Technically, acts of oral or anal sex continue to be a Class 6 felony in Virginia, affectionately referred to in the Virginia criminal code as “Crimes Against Nature” (Sec 18.2-361). Punishment for conviction is…

“(f) For Class 6 felonies, a term of imprisonment of not less than one year nor more than five years, or in the discretion of the jury or the court trying the case without a jury, confinement in jail for not more than twelve months and a fine of not more than $2,500, either or both.”

This is a STATE crime, to this day, and the state continues to authorize the arrest, detention and prosecution of persons caught violating 18.2-361.

While conviction (at any jurisdictional level) remains highly unlikely, it remains CORRECT to call violations of 18.2-361 to be criminal acts.

The only way for this NOT to be the case is for the Virginia legilature to repeal that section of state law. UNTIL THEN, it is permissible for arrests and charges to be filed, although nearly any judge would dismiss the charges in light of the Lawrence decision.

The LAWRENCE DECISION DID NOT REPEAL anti-sodomy laws. It merely made conviction a practical unlikelihood.

So, yes… you can STILL be arrested in Virginia and (theoretically) prosecuted. Since this is true, you would permenently have an “arrest record” if a police officer wanted to target you.

THIS PROVES THE IMPERRATIVE NEED for all states to repeal their anti-sodomy laws and remove the criminal stigma that continues to be attached to them.

Erin

June 4th, 2011

@ Mike. The Federal Reserve is NOT a federal agency. It is as federal as Federal Express. It is a private, central Bank. Yes, that’s right, greedy business men decide the money supply of our nation.

BlackDog

June 5th, 2011

I didn’t read them, for the same reason I don’t read Yahoo comments anymore. I can imagine it’s full of ignorant remarks and spammed comments by redneck idiots and right wing nut jobs.

BlackDog

June 5th, 2011

Okay, that’s wierd…I was commenting on the post above this one…I think.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Texas Leads A Five-State Lawsuit Over Obamacare Transgender Rules

Wikileaks Outs Saudi Gay Men, Male Rape Victims, People With HIV

Is Australia's Marriage Equality Plebiscite Doomed?

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1970: New York Times Looks At "Homosexuals In Revolt"

Today In History, 1977: "The Advocate" Reports Another FBI Document Dump On Gay Rights Groups

Today In History, 1977: Houston Klan: "We Endorse and Seek the Execution of All Homosexuals"

Today In History, 1988: Canada's Largest Protestant Church Accepts Gay Ordination

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.