June 28th, 2011
File this under “you have got to be kidding me” (San Diego 10News.com)
Local businessman and devout Catholic John Sanfilippo died last week after struggling with emphysema. Friends said Sanfilippo planned for the funeral mass to be held at Our Lady of the Rosary Catholic Church in Little Italy, where Sanfilippo had attended for decades. Friends said he even left the church a large sum of money in his will.
This past weekend, Sanfilippo’s partner of 28 years and Sanfilippo’s family were notified that the church canceled the funeral because Sanfilippo was gay.
The Diocese reversed the parish’s decision, but the family is no longer interested in having the service take place there. I hope that they challenge that provision of the will.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
homer
June 28th, 2011
If you go to Thomas Peters blog, he and his followers were opening celebrating the fact that the funeral was canceled. It was just creepy to read those sort of comments.
Kevin
June 28th, 2011
I had already visited that blog and read the comments. That is one hateful place.
Priya Lynn
June 28th, 2011
Where does one find this Thomas Peters’ blog?
A google search showed no likely example of such a thing.
Richard Rush
June 28th, 2011
Priya, I think this may be it:
http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=18478
Lightning Baltimore
June 28th, 2011
His blog is American Papist. The post in question is here.
Priya Lynn
June 28th, 2011
Thanks Richard and Lightning.
Hunter
June 28th, 2011
Isn’t it strange how the Diocese is no longer so anti-gay when there’s a large sum of money involved?
Dave H
June 28th, 2011
Unfortunately, the will probably cannot be changed posthumously, unless his partner and/or family can prove that it’s not genuine, was signed under duress, or if the deceased was not of sound mind.
TonyJazz
June 28th, 2011
I hope this opens the eyes (and heads) of those of us who support the catholic church.
It remains one of the world’s leaders against fairness for gay people.
Doesn’t that tell you something about the morality of the church? (I was a former member.)
Tony P
June 29th, 2011
I would hope he had a clause in his will that if the church refused Rite of Christian Burial there would be no monetary donation.
Rob in San Diego
June 29th, 2011
Bishop Brom did the same thing back in 2005 when John McCusker died. John and his partner owned a night club called Montage here in San Diego. I was so pissed off at the whole ordeal I went to the funeral which was held at an episcopal church to show solidarity and I was raised catholic. After that funeral Brom issued an apology and changed his mind on not allowing it. Again, after the funeral, I don’t think anyone showed up.
TampaZeke
June 29th, 2011
I know I’m going to be the bad guy for saying this but I think it needs to be said. Who’s really the bigger asshole here? Unfortunately I would have to say it’s the deceased. Could he possibly have been unaware of the Catholic Church’s hatred and disgust for him and other openly gay people? Could he REALLY have expected that they were going to treat him differently in death than they told him they believed he should be treated in life? Had he never heard of this happening before? It happens all the time. Had he somehow missed all of the rabidly homophobic edicts issued by priests, Bishops and the Pope on a DAILY basis? Yet he continued to give his devotion and his money to this rabidly homophobic empire.
I’m certainly not defending the Catholic Church or their actions, they are shameful and disgusting; but rather I’m pointing out that the deceased was a willing and active participant in how he was treated and how other people are treated by the Church that he supported and promoted. As horrible as that is to think about, it’s undeniably true.
This is a perfect example of the moral of Aesop’s fable about the Farmer and the Snake (or the Frog and the Scorpion). Snakes BITE, Scorpions STING and the Catholic Church HATES openly, actively, gay people. Any Farmer who doesn’t understand that; any Frog that doesn’t understand that; and any Person who doesn’t understand that WILL (not might) get Bitten, Stung or Fucked respectively. You can’t nurture a viper and then be surprised when it bites you. IT’S WHAT VIPERS DO!
Priya Lynn
June 29th, 2011
Tampazeke said “Who’s really the bigger asshole here? Unfortunately I would have to say it’s the deceased.”.
No Tampazeke, its the church. The deceased wasn’t hurting anyone, the church however is doing its best to hurt gays – the church is the only a*hole here.
While its likely Sanfillippo knew about the Catholic hierarchy’s anti-gay stance its also clear that the local church ignored the hierarchy’s policy, welcomed him for many years and never made an issue out of his orientation. Its not surprising or unreasonable that he’d expect them to continue this acceptance after his death.
If you think expecting the Catholic church to revise its anti-gay position makes one an a*hole then, yes you most certainly are “the bad guy”.
TonyJazz
June 29th, 2011
Any gay person who believes that the catholic church really welcomes us is a fool. The church campaigns against us for the right of EMPLOYMENT and freedom from discrimination, as well as the right of marriage.
TampaZeke, you are right. It wasn’t the church’s fault that this person left money to a church that despised him. He should have known better.
It’s a similar situation with the republican party (for the most part).
Johnson
June 29th, 2011
Who in their right mind would want to buried in that Church (and a few others) anyway?
Priya Lynn
June 29th, 2011
Tony said “TampaZeke, you are right. It wasn’t the church’s fault that this person left money to a church that despised him.”.
I don’t think anyone said that was the church’s fault.
cd
June 29th, 2011
I’ve been reading Religious Right blogs and forums for a couple of years. And it’s sadly remarkable how utterly they’ve turned on gay rights and gay people as the perceived epitome of all their problems.
The more orthodox the group, the more gay clergy (and often, gay laity) it seems to have. This realization- and correlation- is causing incredible cognitive dissonance among RR activists. Which results in all these denial mechanisms and seemingly inexplicable hysterias, notably one about gay clergy potentially using the secular laws to change matters inside “their” churches by reactionary activists.
Regan DuCasse
June 29th, 2011
They refused him a Mass, are they also going to refuse the money he bequeathed them on principle?
Centuries ago, around the time of the Enlightenment, the Church offered companionate marriages to same sex couples. Usually they were wealthy or from powerful families. To be able to marry, they had to donate money or bequeath their property to the Church. So this wasn’t a trend among the masses.
This is also why the Church required celibacy in priests. To assure his assets would go to the Church, rather than heirs or widows.
The CC is quite mercenary in their tactics, while at the same time choosing which part of their religious convictions to forget when convenient.
Sanfillippo’s survivors shouldn’t have to sue for the money back. The Church should have no qualms about doing it on their own.
William
June 29th, 2011
You can’t possibly have a practising homosexual being laid to rest with the full rites of the Church.
Now a paedophile, for example – that would be quite a different matter. Read the story of a London priest here:
http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/commentandblogs/2011/06/20/why-didnt-the-rosminian-order-tell-us-the-truth-about-fr-kit/
CPT_Doom
June 29th, 2011
On 9/11, the copilot of the plane that was crashed into the Pentagon happened to be a gay man and a parishioner at St. Matthews – the main Catholic Church here in DC (where JFK was buried from). His partner was treated with full respect by the Church when the pilot’s funeral was held. Clearly not every Catholic Church is as heartless as this one.
And I wonder, do they refuse funerals to all their divorced and remarried parishioners?
TampaZeke
June 29th, 2011
Priya, I’d rather be a bad guy for my opinion on this particular issue, than a fool any day.
It wasn’t the Diocese or the larger Church that refused him the funeral. It was the very congregation that he had supported all of those years. Are you really expecting people to believe that they completely changed their teachings and beliefs AFTER Mr. Sanfillippo died and never expressed it to its congregants prior?
Leave A Comment