Jim Burroway

August 17th, 2011

That’s how many couples that have entered into civil unions since Rhode Island began offering them in July. There was a time when news of a new state offering civil unions was loudly cheered. But when marriage equality — which was seen as very doable earlier this year — was ditched in favor of a very pale hint of an imitation, it landed with a thud. And as a result, Rhode Islanders have stayed away in droves:

“If it had been marriage people would have been lining up,” said Dawn Euer, a spokeswoman for Marriage Equality Rhode Island. “People are holding out for marriage. They want true equality, not a made-up, bureaucratic, second-class status.”

…Give it time,” said Rep. Peter Petrarca, D-Lincoln. “It’s summer. I’m sure we’ll see an uptick once people start figuring it out and deciding what they want.”

Uh-huh. Funny, but it was also summer in New York and nobody had to ask anyone there to just “give it time.”


August 17th, 2011

Since Rhode Island is small enough that a short drive to a neighboring state would get you full marriage, why settle for second best?


August 17th, 2011

You get invited for breakfast and you find out they’re serving powered eggs. No wonder nobody went.


August 17th, 2011

You get invited for breakfast and you find out they’re serving powdered eggs.


August 17th, 2011

All couples should have the same deal offered on grounds of equal rights, but it doesn’t help to say civil unions are “bureaucratic” and “made up” because that is equally true of any marriage recognised by the state. (If the legislature can change who is eligible for it and what benefits it gives, then it is their creation for all purposes.) Being sentimental about marriage whilst not wanting to seperate it from the state is the root of opposition to gay marriage.


August 17th, 2011

RI Senate – 29 Dems, 8 Republicans, 1 Independent

RI House – 65 Dems, 10 Republicans

And despite this overwhelming control of both houses of the legislature, the Democrats tell us that “the votes weren’t there” for marriage equality. What a complete and total betrayal.

Unfortunately, the RI gays don’t show any signs of creating their equivalent of FightBackNY, in which they knock off a target list of anti-gay Dems. Until they do that, or bribe Sen. Pres. Paiva-Weed, they will never get marriage.


August 17th, 2011

How can you separate marriage from the state when marriage is granted, enforced and dissolved only by the state? That would mean marriage didn’t exist, seeing as how it’s only a function of the state.

Obviously, abolishing marriage would level the playing field for everyone, but, realistically, that is not going to happen. So why not make this purely state function equally available to couples regardless of their sexual orientation, as is our right as tax-paying state-supporting citizens? That would seem to be the easiest solution and is obviously the correct one.

As to sentimentality about anything, it’s fine if you have it, but it has no bearing on the law, basic human rights and equality.


August 17th, 2011

Good to see people avoiding this embarrassment of civil unions in RI.

Half a loaf?

No thanks…. (what were those legislators thinking???)


August 17th, 2011

Anti marriage equality people love to boast that marriage equality isn’t important because (according to them) only 0.000000000001% of the population is gay and only 0.0001% if them even want marriage. Let’s accept their bizarre math and statistics for a moment. Lets say that marriage had been made legal in Rhode Island, instead of Civil Unions, and the same number of people (or LESS) had shown up to marry, which is slightly possible, the response should be IT DOESN’T MATTER ONE BIT how many people take advantage of the right to marry. A civil right should be available to EVERYONE even if NO ONE wants to take advantage of it.

Priya Lynn

August 17th, 2011

Zeke, the other hole in their logic is if they really believe virtually no gays are going to marry how is gays marrying supposed to destroy heterosexual marriages?

Rebecca Ashling

August 17th, 2011

So if I counted the zeroes correctly, these people say only one in a trillion people are gay or lesbian, and only one in ten thousand of these want to be married. Can’t they apply simple arithmetic to their hyperbole? There are only about 6.8 humans on this planet after all.

Rebecca Ashling

August 17th, 2011

6.8 billion humans. Silly typo!


August 17th, 2011

@Rebecca, sorry I wasn’t more clear in my tongue in cheek method of pointing out the absurdity of Anti-gay Inc.’s claims about the gay community.

To hear them talk you would think that only 1 in ten trillion people are gay. Maybe I left off a zero. :)

Rob in San Diego

August 17th, 2011

They probably all went to New York.


August 18th, 2011

Gays and lesbians are finally understanding two things about civil unions/domestic partnerships after following the UK and France experience. First, civil marriage is a government construct – if it’s good enough for the straights why should gays have to settle for second class? The second point is that civil unions are NOT a stepping-stone to marriage; so far, the political bigots have said: “Those greedy gays and lesbians (they aren’t that polite) aren’t satisfied with what WE’VE given them. Shut up and go away.”

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts


Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.