September 21st, 2011
President Barack Obama spoke at the United Nations General Assembly today, where he called on member states to protect the human rights of gays and lesbians:
And to make sure our societies reach their potential, we must allow our citizens to reach theirs. No country can afford the corruption that plagues the world like a cancer. Together, we must harness the power of open societies and open economies. That’s why we’ve partnered with countries from across the globe to launch a new partnership on open government that helps ensure accountability and helps to empower citizens. No country should deny people their rights to freedom of speech and freedom of religion, but also no country should deny people their rights because of who they love, which is why we must stand up for the rights of gays and lesbians everywhere.
According to the White House, this is the first time that a sitting U.S. President affirmed the rights of gays and lesbians before the U.N. General Assembly.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Ray Harwick
September 21st, 2011
So we now know that the President wll be the guest speaker at the HRC cocktail party on 10/1/11. Will his pre- speech propaganda echo his last visit – “I’m not going to make any news”.
I despair. It’s like waiting to see what’s going to happen on “As The World Turns” 4 episodes in advance. Will he? Won’t he? Is he fucking with our emotions? Are we *really* human beings? Do our relationships *really* matter?
Stay tuned. Barack Obama will let us know the answer at a future date since he has the luxury to to to that. And if it’s it not the answer we want, well, go ahead and vote for him because, hey, what’s your alternative: Mitt Romney or Rick Perry?
How about NONE OF THE ABOVE.
Priya Lynn
September 22nd, 2011
Ray a vote for none of the above is a vote for Perry or Romney.
Christopherâ„¢
September 22nd, 2011
This next Presidential election is all about the Supreme Court.
Do you want Obama to pick the next two justices that are sure to step down soon… or a Republican?
If you care at all about the future of gay rights, then the answer to that question is obvious.
MsRowena
September 22nd, 2011
“If you care at all about the future of gay rights, then the answer to that question is obvious.”
You don’t get to decide that for me. Hyperbole rarely wins the day.
Mark F.
September 22nd, 2011
The Democrats can always count on the “I’ll vote for the Democrat becuause he’s almost always just a little better than the Republican” vote. I’m sure if Perry was supporting gay executions and Obama was just supporting life in prison, we’d be urged to vote for Obama.
Priya Lynn
September 22nd, 2011
Mark, what would you rather do instead, vote for Perry? Or stay not vote and in essence vote for Perry by default. When you’re limited to the choice of two evils the only rational thing to do is vote for the lesser of the two.
Leave A Comment