Why is Amtrak Blocking LGBT News Sites?
Jim Burroway
October 21st, 2011
And why is Seattle Gay News considered a porn site?
News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoricMassachusetts GOP Senate Candidate goes to Pride
The Daily Agenda for Wednesday, June 19
Another Exodus Conference Is Upon Us. Let's Review.
For Our Opponents: Talking to Your Kids About Same-Sex Marriage
The Daily Agenda for Tuesday, June 18
The Daily Agenda for Monday, June 17
The Daily Agenda for Sunday, June 16
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
And why is Seattle Gay News considered a porn site?
tim
October 21st, 2011 | LINK
sigh
Automatic filters are just that – automatic. Chances are that Amtrak hired someone to come in and install a content filter and they left the settings at default.
Also – some gay news sites do cross the line between basic advertisement and inappropriate imagery so its not surprising that they would be categorized as porn (or at least adult). Many non-gay sites also get mis-categorized. Just a month ago we ran across a number of local church sites that were classified as porn. Why? Because several years ago – those same URLs were porn sites (specifically straight bondage – we looked it up).
Content filters are imperfect mechanisms but feel free to feel ‘false outrage’ anyways if it makes you feel better.
B John
October 21st, 2011 | LINK
I agree at this point. Do what the message says, contact Amtrak and ask them to fix it.
If they don’t…the outrage is the appropriate response.
Andrew
October 21st, 2011 | LINK
Amtrak should be able to fix it. Good filter companies (like the one filtering my internet right now, at work) can distinguish between identity and pornography when it comes to gay issues by using a granular model — rather than the heterosexist model that assumes that anything related to sexuality must be intrinsically dirty.
It basically extends from the days when these filters were geared primarily for schools and children.
Frankly, Amtrak shouldn’t be filtering anything, if you ask me. Grown ups are precisely that. If I want to spend my commute watching porn without disturbing anyone else, that’s entirely my privilege if I’ve paid for the bandwidth.
Tone
October 21st, 2011 | LINK
My partner and I were recently on Coast Starlight between SEA and SFO and we had no problems with blocked sites, when we had service at all. There were a few drop outs here and there. After reading up on the issue I’ve come to the conclusion though that we’re a rather boring couple.
As for blocking porn on public transportation I cannot disagree with it if you are sitting in coach, and possibly have children able to see your screen. It is responsible to keep it clean in such a setting. At the moment, at least on Coast Starlight, Internet is only offered to first class passengers anyway.
Amtrak charges a lot of money for their first class bedroom accommodations. Since those areas are by definition private, I see no reason why there should be any blocking going on there, assuming you’re not surfing pr0n in the parlour or dining cars.
Of course the solution is to just bring your aircard or stick with you and hope you’re always near a tower.
Tony P
October 21st, 2011 | LINK
More than likely they use at&t for the net connection over a cell connection. I know that’s what MBTA does.
And I have peripheral involvement with the folks at at&t and I can tell you beyond a shadow of a doubt, they are nitwits.
I say this because the ‘geniuses’ at at&t can’t figure out how to split a syslog feed. Duh!
As to content filtering, I’m in the process of putting together the plans for a ward wide publish MESH WiFi network. I do plan on some content filtering but will work carefully not to block legitimate content.
But I won’t put the connection up without a proxy and a content filter. I’ve seen what people do on ‘public’ computers and I don’t want that little liability for the project.
iDavid
October 22nd, 2011 | LINK
I just assumed too many wives were complaining their husbands were accessing gay porn.
When all else fails, a cell phone 3-4G wifi Hotpot should help eleviate the porblem.
Reed Boyer
October 22nd, 2011 | LINK
George Bakan’s gonna love this.
Leave A Comment