Cain Flips, Now Supports Constitutional Ban on Same-Sex Marriage

Jim Burroway

October 24th, 2011

Only six days separate two opposite positions staked by Godfather Pizza magnate and GOP presidential aspirant Herman Cain on same-sex marriage. On Sunday, October 16, Cain appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press and said that he “wouldn’t seek” (his emphasis) a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. But six days later, while appearing on Pat Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network’s The Brody File, Cain flipped his stance before the evangelical audience and said that he now supports a federal constitutional ban on same-sex marriage:

(On October 16, Meet The Press)

David Gregory: A couple more. Same-sex marriage: would you seek a Constitutional band on same-sex marriage?

Herman Cain: I wouldn’t seek a constitutional ban for same-sex marriage, but I am pro-traditional marriage.”

Gregory: But you would let the states make up their own mind as they do now?

Cain: They would make up their own minds, yes.

— — —

(On October 22, The Brody File)

David Brody: Just so I understand, you’re for a constitutional marriage amendment as well?

Cain: Marriage should be protected level also. I used to believe that it could be just handled by the states, but there’s a movement going on to basically take the teeth out of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act and that could cause an unraveling. So we do need some protection at the federal level because of that. And so, yes, I would support legislation that would say that it’s between a man and a woman.”

Brody: Because there is a concern that the defense of marriage act could be overturned?

Cain: It could be overturned because there are already attempts by some states and some groups to weaken the Defense of Marriage Act.

Ray Harwick

October 24th, 2011

Show of hands please: Who believes that, were Herman Cain elected president, the subject of a constitutional amendment to protect marriage for teh gays would ever emerge from the oval office?

He’s just pandering for every bigot he can get to vote for him in the GOP primary.

Regan DuCasse

October 24th, 2011

I truly cannot stand a black person or any person from a minority still suffering from systemic bigotry and discrimination, pandering to the very people willing to maintain it. If he can’t appreciate the danger in that, then he’s not the kind of person who deserves to be in such a powerful office.

Pandering to ANY kind of bigotry, (but too cowardly to call it that), is a disgrace.
I’m also sick of enriched businessmen thinking they can run a COUNTRY like a business.
You can’t.
Doing so is exactly why we’re in this mess.

enough already

October 24th, 2011

Ray,
I’ll take that bet, see you and raise you.
I live just down the road from a former Nazi concentration camp.
We learned the hard way, a rung bell of freedom can very much – and quite easily – be unrung.

I don’t doubt for one second, if the Republicans win the presidency in 2012, the Supreme Court will be tipped at the first possible opportunity against us and, anti-human status amendment for us or no, the Supreme Court will set aside our human status for decades.

Charles

October 24th, 2011

Cain is not ready for prime time, yet. As these two different interviews show. And, if a Republican is elected as president the gay rights movement will on. The hysteria of some people amaze me. I am not on the Democrat plantation.

Charles

October 24th, 2011

Does anyone else on this thread remember that Obama does not support same-sex marriage?

PLAINTOM

October 24th, 2011

These self-called conservatives are willing to shred every principle they profess to support in response to their blind hatred of gays. States rights and individual liberty are simply the latest casualties of their cultural war. If the Republicans gain the Senate and the White House, I actually fear what they might do.

Charles

October 24th, 2011

“If the Republicans gain the Senate and the White House, I actually fear what they might do.” – Plaintom

Why, I nominate Dick Cheney as president and his lesbian daughter as Secretary of State.

S. D. Jeffries

October 25th, 2011

Cain apparently doesn’t understand how the U.S. system of government works: “It could be overturned because there are already attempts by some states and some groups to weaken the Defense of Marriage Act.”

States can’t “weaken,” much less overturn, a federal law. Cain seems to have the idea that being the president would be like being CEO of a company: tell all the employees (congress and state governments) what you want done, no questions asked, and it gets done. Yet another reason why a successful businessman should never be president.

customartist

October 25th, 2011

This will be the Agenda no matter who the GOP nominee happens to be.

Lindoro Almaviva

October 25th, 2011

Show of hands please: Who believes that, were Herman Cain elected president, the subject of a constitutional amendment to protect marriage for teh gays would ever emerge from the oval office?,/b>

Lemme make it even simplert for y’all:

Show of hands, who believes that Herman Cain has a chance is hell of ever being president…

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.