Federal domestic partnership benefits bill introduced

Timothy Kincaid

November 18th, 2011

Cong. Ros-Lehiten with Susan Shelly

About a week ago I had the opportunity to meet Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL). She was in Los Angeles for an evening and made time to speak to Log Cabin Republicans about her ongoing support for civil equality in our nation’s capital, and a friend invited me to be his guest.

At that time she told the assembled crowd that she would be co-sponsoring a bill with Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) to recognize the domestic partners of federal employees and offer benefits equivalent to those offered to spouses. Today that bill was introduced.

“I am pleased to co-sponsor this legislation because we are a nation that prides itself on treating everyone as equals and this bill assures that we bring those same ideals to the regulations that guide federal benefits for domestic partners of federal employees,” said Congresswoman Ros-Lehtinen. “We have taken steps to gain equal rights for all but much remains to be done. Passage of this legislation will be one step in the right direction. I am pleased that the Senate has also introduced a similar bill,” she said.

The companion Senate bill is co-sponsored Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT).

(Susan Shelly, pictured with the Congresswoman, is running for Congress as a Republican in the 30th Congressional district as a social liberal and fiscal conservative.)


November 18th, 2011

It makes me so happy that I can cast my vote for her. She’s the politician any other politician of any party should look up to.

Her articles on El Nuevo Herald (Spanish version of Miami Herald) are always a delight to read, especially those addressing the failure of a body we know as the UN.


November 19th, 2011

Understanding that there are Straight Domestic Partners, but not addressing those, I fail to understand just how this does not defy DOMA?

Isn’t this Federal Recognition of “something like Marriage”?

Will this chip away one small piece of DOMA?

Ben M

November 19th, 2011

@customartist – Since both are simply matters of statute, I believe the norm is to is that the newer statute abrogates a prior statutes where they are inconsistent. On the other hand, a court seems more likely to find that domestic partnerships are, in the view of the “conflicting laws,” so unlike a marriage that DOMA and domestic partnership laws do not conflict.

It is an implicit statement that a domestic partnership and marriage are not that same that had allowed some States with constitutional provisions against marriage equality to pass domestic partnership laws.

Michael S

November 19th, 2011

As a Federal Employee, this is welcome news. I’m curious about its chances of passing. Does it even have a shot, or is it just to make a point — again? I know previous efforts have failed. Where can I keep watch on this bill, and how can I get involved (without violating my agency’s code of conduct, of course)?

Nick Literski

November 21st, 2011

This same bill has been introduced multiple years. Last year, it made it through committees for both the House and Senate, but never came to the floor. Lieberman (who is touted here as a cosponsor) promised in the Senate committee not to bring it to the floor without a full explanation of how the cost would be offset by other spending cuts, etc. The GAO showed that the cost would be mostly set off by the newly-paying healthcare premiums, but since that wasn’t a “complete” cost coverage, nothing further was done.

I’m a federal employee who truly needs this legislation due to my partner having a chronic illness. Unfortunately, the current political climate is to CUT benefits to federal employees (or as some in Congress are proposing, actually slash salaries). I don’t see this bill making it through the House committee this time, given the current conditions.


February 4th, 2012

Interestingly, some large federal government agencies (Department of State and DHS) already provide a number of benefits to partners – and their children – while posted overseas (housing and post allowances, health services, etc.). However, when an employee returns to the US to continue employment within the agency – nada. That is not fair – in fact, it’s a bit perplexing how an agency provides and then takes away just because an employee moves back to the US. A case in point that shows the need for a law that forces agencies to provide equally to all families in all circumstances!

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.