GOP Presidential Candidate Supports Marriage Equality

Jim Burroway

December 1st, 2011

Evolved already.

Pam’s Spaulding has the scoop. While former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson’s chances of capturing the Republican nomination is just a smudge better than nil, he is now the only significant candidate of either party to support full marriage equality. (Okay, there’s Fred Karger, but still.) He made his announcement during an online town hall hosted by GoProud’s Jimmy LaSalvia:

For a very long time, society has viewed gay marriage as a moral and, yes, religious issue. Today, I believe we have arrived at a point in history where more and more Americans are viewing it as a question of liberty and freedom. That evolution is important, and the time has come for us to align our marriage laws with the notion that every individual should be treated equally.

Johnson’s use of the word “evolution” is a nice touch. Last time we checked in on President Obama, he said he was “still evolving.”

Head to Pam’s place for the full statement.


December 2nd, 2011

Gary Johnson is the first straight POTUS candidate to support marriage equality, which is a bigger milestone than the same coming from a gay POTUS candidate like Karger. In fact, it’s about as big a milestone as having a gay POTUS candidate. And to top it off they’re both Republicans – there’s hope for the GOP yet!

Ben In Oakland

December 2nd, 2011

I have always like mr. Johnson. i saw him on jon Stewart and thought he had a great deal to offer. against the drug watrs, for example.

But the LAST I heard, he was only for civil unions. This is quite an improvement.

Priya Lynn

December 2nd, 2011

Jim said “Last time we checked in on President Obama, he said he was “still evolving.”.

That statement to me is proof of Obama’s dishonesty on marriage equality. He supported it some years ago and then when he became a presidential candidate he was suddenly against it. Many think he secretly supports marriage equality and is publicly opposing it for political expediency – I’m sure that’s the case. One wouldn’t say one was “evolving” (going to change one’s mind) unless one knew that down the road when the winds were blowing the right direction they are going to suddenly “change” their mind.

On marriage equality Obama is a political flip-flopper in the same vein as Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney.


December 2nd, 2011

Johnson’s not the first presidential candidate to support gay marriage. (And calling him a “significant” candidate is stretching the word to the breaking point) Both Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel supported gay marriage when they ran in the Democratic Primary in 2008. Of course, they had no chance of winning the nomination, either.
I suspect that whatever Democrat wins the primary in 2016 will probably be able to say he/she is for gay marriage. I certainly hope so, anyway.

Timothy Kincaid

December 3rd, 2011


You’re probably right. But not only that, I suspect that by 2016, the Republican candidate position will be “of course I support gay marriage, but we should respect the rights of states that do not”.

The evolution on this issue is happening at an astonishingly rapid pace. I honestly believe that by 2012, no candidate for president could hope to be elected with any position that opposes marriage equality.


December 4th, 2011

Well, your optimism is consistent at least. However given the GOP’s move to the far right in the last couple of years, I couldn’t imagine a GOP candidate winning a primary in 2016 that was even remotely gay friendly. None of them even support DADT repeal, except for unelectable types like Johnson. Besides, given Obama’s abysmal approval ratings, the 2016 GOP candidate will likely be incumbent President Romney or Gingrich, and certainly neither of them will be supporting gay marriage a scant five years from now.

Ned Flaherty

December 4th, 2011

Here’s what the remaining 11 candidates plan for 31 million LGBT Amerians:

Timothy Kincaid

December 5th, 2011


Yeah, it’s a pretty optimistic prediction.

But, nevertheless, if Romney is elected, I suspect that in four years’ time, he’ll have the “I respect the right of states to choose to accept/ban gay marriage” position. Remember that the professional phobes in Massachusetts hate Mitt for not fighting the marriage ruling enough. (They have all sorts of wacky theories as to how he could have stopped it).

I also wouldn’t be surprised if Gingrich took a similar position. He’ll repackage himself to be whatever he thinks he needs to be. Of course, both will claim to be personally opposed (which is kinda the opposite of what I predicted, but you get my point).

In any case, if the Republican candidate in 2016 runs as the anti-gay-marriage candidate like Bush 2008 did, that would sink them.

Timothy Kincaid

December 21st, 2011

I can’t help but wonder if Gary Johnson is running for Republican Nominee 2016 or 2020. Because this position is likely to be the only acceptable one by that time and he can be the “I’m not a flip-flopper” candidate.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.