Glitter-Bombing Has Jumped the Shark

Jim Burroway

January 23rd, 2012

From the very beginning, I felt that glitter-bombing has failed both as protest and as street theater. Someone threw glitter at Bachmann.  Someone threw glitter at Gingrich. Big deal. It seems the only people paying attention are glitterbombers. Everyone else is pretty much yawning. And now this:

In an interview with Xtra after the confrontation, activist Fister Limp Wrist accused (glitter-bombed Dan) Savage of “ableist, racist, transphobic, fat-phobic, sero-phobic and rape-apologist attitudes and views.”

I’m surprised “Fister” forgot to include mysoginist, classist, and specist to his list of sins.

Tony P

January 23rd, 2012

I’m all for a return to pies. They left a more visible mess as Anita Bryant knows all too well.

Regan DuCasse

January 23rd, 2012

I can forgive someone misspeaking out of ignorance and who is contrite later and does do some work on self education.
It’s only human, and no one can articulate a point perfectly every time.
It’s always best to read the person’s intentions or mistakes before attacking and completely shutting them down.
Which effectively shuts down any further interchange and educational opportunity.

This glitter bombing is counterproductive. It’s an assault, not a tactic of working with and into a forum for a meaningful exchange.

At this point, young gay people need to continue to take their cues from the Civil Rights Movement.
Committed to DIALOGUE and serious, sober public demonstrations in appropriate and conservative CLOTHING.

LGBT issues are still VERY urgent and serious.
For young people to treat it like a circus, or Rip Taylor moment, will make the opposition laugh and leave the situation with no intention of EVER engaging at all.
Santorum kept on grinning and laughing off his glitter bombing.
Believe me, this is NOT the way.
We are BETTER than that. We MUST be.
We have much more important things and ways to go about this business than quick and dirty spectacle.

a.mcewen

January 23rd, 2012

Glitterbombing (and pies) is stupid from the get-go. They are the sign of laziness and an unwillingness to plan and organize. Those who partake in this madness seem to want a quick rush rather than a much more satisfying end results of attaining your rights in a way which sustains these same rights.

Lucrece

January 23rd, 2012

It’s infantile. I’d like to see how gay people feel when an Evangelical Christian dowses a gay activist or elected official with holy water.

It’s an invasion of personal space and disgusting aggression-based tactic that accomplishes nothing but paint us as petty children lashing out.

It’s just rich in irony that the oh so progressive “Queer Theory” (AKA Queer Quackery) crowd is the one mainly supporting this.

Ryan

January 23rd, 2012

Well, I learned two words today: “ablist” and “sero-phobic”. I can’t wait to use those on someone who wrongs me, like a co-worker who forgets to make another pot of coffee when they take the last of it.

Richard Rush

January 23rd, 2012

I’m with Tony P. I mean, how many glitter-bombings are memorable? But a well timed, well-tossed pie at a well-chosen subject and venue can be memorable for decades:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmJUdLUo8HQ

TN

January 24th, 2012

Infighting is always successful. It brings us together as a community. /s. WTF is wrong with these people? Dan Savage has used the word “tranny” a few times and suddenly that makes him an anti-LGBT activist? Forget about these idiots. They are only hurting the cause.

Hunter

January 24th, 2012

OK — now we know that Fister Limp Wrist (seriously?) is an idiot. He’d fit right in at a couple of blogs that shall remain nameless, where cant takes the place of thought.

I do disagree with the characterization of pies as stupid. Pies in the face have history and resonance, making the recipient the object of ridicule. After all, who got pies in the face? Clowns. Glitterbombing, on the other hand, is meaningless to the public at large.

Jay Jonson

January 24th, 2012

I am in favor of glitterbombing homophobes. I am NOT in favor of glitterbombing heroes like Dan Savage by disturbed crazy people like the idiot named Fister Limp Wrist.

Snowman

January 24th, 2012

Fister Limp Wrist??

Seriously there’s either a few issues there, or that guy has a couple of antigay stereotypes for a name.

How does anyone take such a person seriously and how does HE expect anyone to take him seriously??

Sounds like something that Delgaudio guy that sends out the emails for a living might’ve dreamed up. Idiots.

Stephen

January 24th, 2012

Teabaggery of the left.

Charles

January 24th, 2012

Pie throwing is assault and is even worse. If we can’t make our arguments intelligently and coherently you do the Gay Rights movement no good in resorting to such sophomoric acts.

Timothy (TRiG)

January 24th, 2012

Dan Savage has his problems (why was biphobia left off that list of sins?), but I’ve yet to see him say anything that could be taken as rape apologetics. I must look that one up. (Sero-phobia is a new one to me, too. Perhaps I’ll look that one up too.)

TRiG.

fannie

January 24th, 2012

Glitter-boming is counter-productive and problematic.

But also counter-productive and problematic are gay men whose only utterance of the words sexist, racist, misogynist, ableist, and any -ism not solely centered around LGBT issues is to mock, deny, and trivialize the experiences of people experiencing those other -isms.

That totally builds community! /s

homer

January 24th, 2012

I wish I had invested in glitter companies!

JohnAGJ

January 24th, 2012

If the purpose of this is to “raise awareness” and get me to sympathize with their cause, they’ve failed miserably. Well, okay. I’m now “aware” of them and their complaints but their rhetoric and asinine behavior only makes me despise them. If that was their goal, then WINNING! Idiots.

typical

January 25th, 2012

Tony P??? Is that Tony Perkins???

Boo

January 25th, 2012

TN- this is about a lot more than Savage just using the word “tranny.” There’s his continual promotion of notorious transphobe Alice Dreger for one thing. I don’t necessarily agree with glitter bombin as a tactic, but if your cause is to tell the trannies to sit down and shut up at the back of the bus while gay people get theirs, then I’m sorry to be blunt, but fuck your cause.

Charles

January 25th, 2012

“Tony P??? Is that Tony Perkins???” – typical

Those who are for pie throwing are idiots. Perhaps the first person who responded to this thread supporting throwing pies instead of harmless glitter was Tony Perkins. We do not need to resort to sophomoric acts. We have the facts on our side. Rely on peaceful, calm intellectual arguments. Leave the theatrics to the theater, where we can tell “our story”.

Iamposterity

January 25th, 2012

I do not agree with Mr. Savage but love him anyway for one simple reason!

He drives the nut-wings bananas!

B A N A N A S

Donny D.

January 28th, 2012

Lucrece wrote,

It’s an invasion of personal space and disgusting aggression-based tactic that accomplishes nothing but paint us as petty children lashing out.

That’s how a great many people see it these days. In the 70s people thought pie-ing was funny. It’s considered assault by many, maybe most people now. Times have changed.

I don’t have a problem with trans or bi activists taking well-considered, measured action against Dan Savage when it’s called for.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.