Gay Man Running

A commentary

Jim Burroway

February 21st, 2012

Josh Marshall sees a silver lining in the Paul Bebau story:

But one thing shines through to me as perhaps the most significant part of the whole media storm: You have a hard-right Republican, with intense political ambitions outed as gay and accused of serious abuse of office. He vigorously denies the charges but says, Yeah, I’m gay. And by the way, I support gay marriage and I also think that gays should be able to serve openly in the US military.

Given what was contained in the original story, it’s not like Babeu had a great deal of choice about disclosing his sexuality. But then that hasn’t stopped others from trying. No comical denials (a la Larry Craig), no slinking off into a shamed obscurity (a la too many sad stories to mention). Just, yeah, I’m gay. And I’m still running for office.

That’s a rather slim sliver of a lining. Unlike with Craig, there are photos and screengrabs floating around which blocked the option of comical denials. And so we’re left with Babeu’s temperment which keeps him from “slinking off into a shamed obscurity.” That much is worthy of admiration, but it’s more an act of bravado than a calculated assessment of the political landscape he finds himself in now.

There is a reason Babeu didn’t talk about his personal life before. When a man runs for public office in the most conservative parts of a state that ranks as one of the most conservative states in the country, the assumption will be that the Republican candidate who calls himself a staunch conservative would naturally be against any sort of gay equality. And that assumed position would naturally be a very popular one in a conservative district in a conservative state. It’s true that Babeu hadn’t yet raised any of these issues in either his nascent congressional campaign or in his runs for sheriff (where LGBT issues typically don’t come up). But as long as he doesn’t say anything to the contrary, the default position, as Dan Savage put it, is that “Conservative voters will assume he holds anti-gay political beliefs and they will expect him to vote anti-gay should he be elected to office.”

So when a candidate speaks at CPAC — which this year excluded GOProud because their brand of conservatism can no longer countenance openly gay people supporting gay marriage — and calls himself the only true conservative in a three-man GOP primary, then the assumption, without any explanation to the contrary, is that he naturally holds his audience’s definition of conservatism. Particularly where the audience’s definition of conservatism is not at all difficult to ascertain. Until now, Babeu was running with those assumptions and he did nothing to disabuse them.

Until now, and Babeu’s campaign chair put on a brave face and said these revelations won’t “make a bit of difference” with voters in Congressional District 4. The Boston Herald agrees, and is all kinds of excited that Babeu’s candidacy makes him the fourth openly gay or bi candidate running for Congress in Arizona. They attribute it to Arizona’s “deep libertarian roots,” which I guess writers in Boston might find significant, but Arizona’s “libertarian roots” are highly localized, and they just happen to include the two congressional districts the other three candidates (all Democrats) are running in. (Two are vying for Reps. Jim Kolbe and Garbrielle Giffords’ old seat. The other encompasses Tempe, Chandler, ASU and the gayborhood of North Central Phoenix.)

But the Libertarian swath however doesn’t include CD4. The redrawn map for CD 4 (PDF: 1 pages, 2MB) now starts in the heavily Mormon districts of the East Valley and Gila County, wraps around northwestward to deeply conservative Yavapai County before spreading out west to Yuma, La Paz, and Mohave Counties. The central Arizona districts of CD4 are heavily Mormon and Evangelical. The three western counties, culturally and politically, have much more in common Bakersfield and California’s Imperial Valley than they do with any romantic Western libertarian ideals of live-and-let-live. And all of the counties which make up CD4 are very anti-gay. In 2008, those counties collectively approved Prop 102, Arizona’s constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, with yes vote tallies of about two-thirds verses around one-third against. Something tells me that one-third isn’t made up of very many Republican primary voters.

I’m glad that Babeu’s out and running as a gay Republican who supports marriage equality. I wish he had come out under his own steam and not because he had no other choice. As it is, it’s hard to know whether he would have held these positions anyway or if, like the pre-outing Rep. Jim Kolbe who voted in favor of DOMA, he would have maintained anti-gay stances to protect his political closet. But you have what you have, and he’s probably making the best of the cards that have been dealt him. Unfortunately with the Republican base in central and western Arizona, you also have the voters that you have. And in the game they’re playing Babeu’s playing a dead hand.

jpeckjr

February 21st, 2012

I still wonder if this entire episode is really an effort by one of the other GOP candidates for CD4 to undermine Babeu’s campaign.

Which is more shocking to the conservatives: that he had an affair, that he had an affair with a legal immigrant, or that he’s gay? It’s the last one. If his affair had been with a woman, this would not be a national news story, a local one, perhaps, and perhaps damaging, but not a national one.

Charles

February 21st, 2012

“I still wonder if this entire episode is really an effort by one of the other GOP candidates for CD4 to undermine Babeu’s campaign.

Which is more shocking to the conservatives: that he had an affair, that he had an affair with a legal immigrant, or that he’s gay? It’s the last one. If his affair had been with a woman, this would not be a national news story, a local one, perhaps, and perhaps damaging, but not a national one.” – jeckjr

I think that the sheriff probably knew that this was going to hit the fan one way or the other. From what I have read about it, he is doing a good job at damage control. But will Republicans in Arizona vote for a gay congressman who believes in gay marriage? I am a Republican and tend to doubt it.

Ryan

February 21st, 2012

“So when a candidate speaks at CPAC — which this year excluded GOProud because their brand of conservatism can no longer countenance openly gay people supporting gay marriage.”

It’s not quite that nuanced. GoProud “takes no position” on gay marriage. So CPAC’s brand of conservatism can no longer countenance openly gay people, period, irrespective of their views on gay rights issues.

Off chance, does any one know of any elected official who is openly gay and Republican anywhere in this country? Not outed after the fact, but ran openly gay and won? I don’t know for sure, but my suspicion would be “no”.

Lucrece

February 21st, 2012

I love how Jim puts outsiders and their lofty interpretations of Arizona politics in place. God, I wish Jim made more posts about Arizona politics and the political landscape of that state ;)

jpeckjr

February 21st, 2012

@charles I’m raising the question of who benefits from this episode?

Mr. Babeu clearly does not. His congressional aspirations are over, and possibly his future as a sheriff, which is an elected position. If he knew “this was going to hit the fan one way or another,” he could have made his sexual orientation public on his own terms and minimized the damage.

Does Jose? If so, how? He has called attention to himself in a manner that might endanger his life. Certainly he cannot imagine Paul is going to beg him to come back.

I believe someone else is benefiting from all of this, a political opponent or enemy of Mr. Babeu’s. Would this matter have been made public at all if Mr. Babeu was not running for Congress? Or co-chairing Mr. Romney’s Arizona campaign?

It’s only speculation on my part. But, who would benefit if this information became public is a standard question in a situation like this.

Ryan

February 21st, 2012

@jpeckjr, anytime a politician is undone by a scandal, others benefit. Usually quite a few others. That alone is not cause for suspicion of some sinister conspiracy.

Erin

February 21st, 2012

Every gay Conservative out there debunks the ridiculous claims of many crazies like Porno Pete that gay acceptance and same sex marriage is part of some all-powerful Liberal agenda. Of course, pointing out the craziness of the crazies never turns off their craziness. They just ignore that and go on to the next crazy argument, or they just ignore the facts and still insist there’s some all-powerful Liberal agenda that gays are part of.

StraightGrandmother

February 22nd, 2012

Very well written and insightful Jim!

Désirée

February 22nd, 2012

@Ryan:

here’s a few out gay Republicans who were elected while being both gay and Republican

http://itsaqueerworld.blogspot.com/2011/04/out-in-politics-gay-republican-elected.html

from http://www.glaad.org/blog/2011-election-roundup-lgbt-equality-victories

Openly gay Republican candidate Bruce Harris was elected as mayor of Chatham Borough, N.J.

also, Redondo Beach, CA has an openly gay Asia-American man, Mike Gin, as mayor.

I’m sure there are more.

Timothy Kincaid

February 22nd, 2012

I think it’s pretty obvious who benefits. And I think that the motivations for the method of exposure are there for anyone who wants to see them.

Babeu is a leader in opposing illegal immigration.

So, to me, there’s not much guessing as to who most benefits from “I’m afraid of Sherrif Paul due to an affair that ended three years ago so here’s a picture of him in his gay gay gay underwear”.

Ryan, there are hundreds of gay Republicans elected accross the country. Usually it’s at the city or county level. In San Diego, for example, you may recall that we discussed three people running for a congressional seat. Including a city councilman and the attorney general, both gay Repulicams.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

FBI Reports Massive Surge In Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes in 2015

Baptist General Convention of Texas Warns Churches in Dallas and Austin Over LGBT Inclusion

Trump Selects Alt-Right Nationalist As "Chief Strategist and Senior Counselor"

WITNESS: Bean Blossom, Indiana

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.