Panel to investigate Babeu

Timothy Kincaid

February 22nd, 2012

According to AZCentral.com, a special panel will investigate whether Sheriff Paul Babeu violated his public trust by threatening to have ex-boyfriend Jose Orozco deported. Interestingly, it is at Babeu’s request.

The local county prosecutor is a political ally of Babeu so rather than conduct an investigation that will be seen as tainted, they are turning instead to the Public Integrity Task Force, a non-partisan committee of neighboring county prosecutors.

In addition, Babeu has requested that the Arizona State Attorney General Tom Horne open a separate investigation into whether he has abused his power. But because Horne and Babeu have also supported each other in the past, the Solicitor General, Dave Cole, will investigate.

That Babeu is requesting investigation may reflect his confidence in the eventual conclusions (or the conclusion makers). Alternately, it may be a step taken to ensure that the investigators not focus solely on Babeu’s behavior to the exclusion of that of Orozco. He requested that the scope include “allegations of human-rights violations, threatening and intimidating, misuse of public resources, theft of property, theft of identity, fraud and impersonation.”

The latter relates to counter-charges made by Babeu’s attorney

Babeu, who said he had a romantic relationship with Orozco that went sour, accused Orozco of taking control of his campaign websites and Twitter account without permission in September and posting unflattering messages.

Chris DeRose, Babeu’s attorney and campaign manager, sent Orozco a cease-and-desist letter vowing to sue if the messages were not removed and the accounts turned back over. Orozco complied, Babeu said, and the matter was dropped.

andrew

February 22nd, 2012

I can’t claim to know what’s going on here – Babeau is smart to do so, and it tends to lend him credibility. The boyfriend is starting to look worse and worse, although not all facts are out yet. I hope the media covers this in an ongoing fashion, since the original story was more about the threat to deport than the outing of the official, and being gay should be irrelevent to the job, while the threat should be a disqualifier.

Babs is starting to come up in my estimations (not hard to do, given that my initial reaction was that he was a total bastard). I’m curious what this guy’s deal is. Sure has a brass pair to stay in the race, call for the investigation, and soldier on. Usually, they just slink away in shame or make unverifiable claims.

Lindoro Almaviva

February 22nd, 2012

That is not the behavior of someone who is

1. afraid or
2. have anything to hide.

either that or he has some deep connections and he knows the result of the investigation before it starts

andrew

February 22nd, 2012

I know it… I want to find out more about Babeau… I split the difference between Dems and GOP. He might be a candidate I can get on board with.

Lindoro Almaviva

February 22nd, 2012

* not afraid, I should say

jpeckjr

February 23rd, 2012

This is a very smart move on Mr. Babeu’s part, both politically and personally. As Lindoro says, he would not do this if he was afraid or had anything to hide.

Duck

February 23rd, 2012

Why the investigation into the identity theft, fraud and impersonation if the matter was resolved via the cease and desist letter? If the problem was resolved, why bring it back up as a potential criminal matter? If it wasn’t resolved prior to this, why wasn’t it being pursued criminally prior to this?

Also, if you are banging your IT staff and it goes sour, what kind of incompetent goober doesn’t make sure that all of the account passwords are changed and that the logins associated with the soured IT boytoy aren’t disabled? Anyone with any kind of knowledge (such as that required to create an adam4adam account) of computer systems knows to have the remaining IT staff change the freaking account settings (and the admin passwords) when IT staff departs, particularly if the parting isn’t completely amicable.

Georgie

February 23rd, 2012

Well, I live in Pinal County and can tell you he’s a great Sheriff. He’s done right by the county and the communities within thus far. I don’t care that he’s gay and it’s really none of my business or anyone elses. It’s unfortunate that this matters in politics sometimes. As if being gay was a discrediting factor. The biggest mistake Babeu made was to post undressed pictures of himself on a website. While the average person doesn’t care, when you’re running for political office, those pics should not be running around. That’s why I’ll never run for any office ;) Oh how the past can come back to haunt you.

Babeu’s ex-boyfriend is sounding more and more like someone with a personal vendetta against him, and so far the text messages I have seen don’t indicate anything more than someone who is trying to avoid someone they are not interested in anymore. Most people try to be nice about it by claiming they’re too busy to spend time with them, a pretty typical action. It will be up to the lawyers and the court to decide if either party have a legal case against the other, but so far it’s just sour grapes. Right now, my money is still on Babeu and I would still support him.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

UN Human Rights Council Creates Its First LGBT Rights Watchdog

Pentagon Ends Ban On Transgender Service Members

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1904: Census Bureau Releases Incarceration Statistics on Sodomy

Today In History, 1969: The New York Times Takes Another Crack At Stonewall

Today In History, 1969: Upper West Side's Renaissance Blighted by "Parading Homosexuals"

Today In History, 1986: Supreme Court Upholds Sodomy Laws in Bowers v. Hardwick

Today In History, 1987: Presidential Advisor Urges Reagan: No Homos On AIDS Commission

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.