The Daily Agenda for Thursday, May 23
It's Not the Principle, It's the Prejudice
Congratulations Mitch!
Gay Couples Excluded from Immigration Bill Markup
How To Spot A Swivel-Eyed Loon
The Daily Agenda for Wednesday, May 22
House of Commons officially passes marriage equality
British Commons Approves Marriage Equality Bill
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
jerry
April 2nd, 2012 | LINK
UHM. Where can I buy one of those memory sticks?
Thank you Timothy for the best laugh I have had today.
Zaylinda
April 3rd, 2012 | LINK
Wait… how do you show 16 indecent images unintentionally? One is ‘oops I opened the wrong folder’, but 16?
David C.
April 3rd, 2012 | LINK
Perhaps in this case the device in question should be called a flesh drive.
Hyhybt
April 3rd, 2012 | LINK
Zaylinda: that depends… the simplest possibility, and the one that most easily leaves open the possibility someone set him up, would be that they were all in one slide.
Otherwise, still presuming for the time being that it was unintentional… I’ve often used an old document as a template for a new one. There’s a *slight* possibility that this is something of that kind, if he was foolish enough 1) to use something like *that* (which he really shouldn’t have in the first place) for this and 2) either not remembering to delete the old items or not making sure it was the correct version on the flash drive… well, it’s not exactly credible, but it’s *possible.* Then it would be a matter of repeatedly thinking the next slide would be the beginning of the intended content, and so moving on as quickly as possible to get to it.
If the linked account is at all accurate, including them deliberately wouldn’t fit at all with his reaction. So it has to be either accident or sabotage.
David Roberts
April 3rd, 2012 | LINK
Actually, a Memory Stick is a particular type of flash drive which came before the currently ubiquitous USB format. I have clients that still use the term generically because they learned it first.
I have yet to hear any of them complain about gay porn spontaneously appearing on their drives, however. Either the priest is really stupid or someone really doesn’t like him.
William
April 3rd, 2012 | LINK
No priest would DELIBERATELY show pornographic images (gay or otherwise) to a gathering of parents – unless he was desperate to get himself thrown out of the priesthood, in which case that would seem an extraordinarily clumsy way of going about it.
I can only suggest that either (1) he had two very similar looking memory sticks in his presbytery and in his haste brought the wrong one with him to the meeting, or (2) some malicious person managed to effect an adroit substitution before the presentation began.
Snowman
April 3rd, 2012 | LINK
Even if he had his back to the screen the whole time and couldn’t see them, you’d think the “Oh my god…” look on people’s faces would’ve clued him in that something was wrong well before he got to the 16th one, idiot.
Sandhorse
April 3rd, 2012 | LINK
I’m just curious as to who was actually taking the time to ‘count’ them. And was this verified with another congregant that exactly 16 were shown? After all, this kind of stuff is important!
I mean, if I was in the midst of worship and suddenly saw pictures of scantily clad, (or not clad at all) men projected on the screen, I suspect I would either be ‘inspired’ or appalled. But I doubt I’d have the presence of mind to sit there and go…1…2…3…
Also, “indecent images of men” is rather ambiguous. Were there multiple men in each picture or were they pictures of individual men? If the latter is the case how can that properly be described as ‘gay’ images. Again, this could be a critical piece of information as well.
All levity aside, this priest does deserve the same presumed innocence as anyone else. The flash drive could have passed through several hands before being presented. Who knows? The one upside, regardless of how you dice it, at least they were pictures of ‘men’.
Anne Noise
April 3rd, 2012 | LINK
@Sandhorse – clearly it was a 4×4 grid of porn, for some reason; easily counted.
Snowman
April 3rd, 2012 | LINK
Ick.
Can’t think of anything else to add.
Timothy (TRiG)
April 3rd, 2012 | LINK
The most obvious explanation: he navigated to the drive, to be greeted with a 4×4 grid of thumbnail images. I don’t think it was a 16-picture slideshow. Or a slideshow at all.
TRiG.
Rob in San Diego
April 5th, 2012 | LINK
Of course he would use his flesh drive, can’t store images directly on his computer.
Hyhybt
April 7th, 2012 | LINK
RiSD: That’s quite a typo… or else a deliberate but unfinished joke.
james
April 24th, 2012 | LINK
itwas amazing 3 accidents in a few moments , first accident showing pictures,
second accident dropping the pen drive to the floor , third accident putting your foot on it , followed by a break in at the priests house
Leave A Comment