Hollywood Chick-Fil-A 24 hours later

Timothy Kincaid

August 2nd, 2012

Today I trotted back to the Hollywood Chick-Fil-A, scene of yesterday’s Chick-Fil-A Appreciation Day. I think it’s important to get some perspective.

This was yesterday:

And here’s that same street almost exactly 24 hours later:


And here is yesterday:

And the same spot today:

They are not empty by any means. They aren’t going out of business any day soon.

But over time they will experience the cost of being the “anti-gay chicken place”. When all the hoopla dies down over “freedom of speech” and the “overbearing mayors”, all that will be remembered is that Chick-Fil-A is anti-gay. And one day of ‘support the biblical definition of marriage’ simply can’t make up for it.

james

August 2nd, 2012

I hope you will check in tomorrow to see if a same-sex kiss-in is happening.

As I noted in another thread, my closest Chick-fil-A is 90 miles away, so I won’t be there tomorrow. Besides, I don’t have any one to kiss. Sigh.

Maybe I should go anyway and kiss someone who is also same-sex kiss-in partnerless. We could fall in love! Become a couple! Have our wedding reception at Chick-fil-A!

How romantic would that be?

RHE

August 2nd, 2012

I agree with Timothy’s well-said comments. Chick-Fil-A is stuck with their reputation, and the facts of their history. That reputation and history will continue to not square with ever greater numbers of people.

They also have another, huge strike against them: The food they sell is bad for you. Bible-believing Christians who want to flock to Chick-Fil-A to affirm their beliefs are at same time harming their bodies. I mean, eating at a freakin’ Chick-Fil-A is just not my idea of some kind high road to holiness. That stuff is utter crap.

Another observation: Chick-Fil-A’s religion-based gay-unfriendliness has been known by me and many people before. It’s not a new revelation. It’s fascinating how, suddenly, it’s on the front pages. But in a way it’s hardly breaking news.

RHE

August 2nd, 2012

On the health point, and addressed to NOM: Eating at Chick-Fil-A is a non-cognitive thing to do.

MattNYC

August 2nd, 2012

Andy Borowitz lent his wit to this:

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2012/08/chick-fil-a-introduces-new-hate-sauce.html

TampaZeke

August 2nd, 2012

And the day it starts cutting into their bottom line Dan Cathy will mysteriously disappear from the spotlight and the company will quietly change their tune, the world will shrug and order another chicken sandwich and Chick-fil-A will continue unscathed like Cracker Barrel.

You can bet your ass that Chick-fil-A won’t close up shop to protect their strongly held “Christian Values”TM They’re “Christian Values” will quietly change to reflect the new social realities and they will act as if they ALWAYS supported full equality for gay people.

And thousands of people who proudly and arrogantly paraded down to Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day will deny that they were ever there!

Having grown up in Mississippi during the end of desegregation I’ve seen this scenario played out, almost to the letter, before so I already know how it ends!

*******Spoiler alert*******

WE WIN!

Dante

August 3rd, 2012

A good example of what is downstream for Chick-fil-a is the history of the Sambo’s restaurant chain.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sambo%27s

Karen

August 3rd, 2012

I see this issue more about free speech than gay marriage. I buy Ben and Jerry’s ice cream but completely disagree w/ their political/social stances. This country allows them to say and believe whatever they want. Why can’t Chick Fil A do the same?

Stefan

August 3rd, 2012

Karen,

They don’t just say they oppose same sex marriage, they donate money to bonefied hate groups that promote the murder of gays/lesbians.

Désirée

August 3rd, 2012

Karen:
what Stefan said… plus, “free speech” doesn’t mean being free from the consequences of that speech or criticism of that speech. A person is free to say gays are going to hell or the blacks are subhuman or jews are all tightwads and I am free to say that such a person is a moron for saying so and I am free to not patronize said person’s company without it affecting that person’s free speech rights one iota.

Richard Rush

August 3rd, 2012

If you believe that more than one or two people in the U.S. went to Chick-fil-A just to stand up for free speech, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn . . .

Timothy (TRiG)

August 3rd, 2012

Quite, Richard, I honestly don’t see what this has to do with “free speech” one way or another.

TRiG.

Richard Rush

August 3rd, 2012

Sambo’s! Dante, I just noticed your comment and did a “double take.”

I was once employed by Sambo’s – not in a restaurant, but in a corporate support function at three different regional offices over a period of several years in the 1970s.

I don’t think the racist perception of the company’s name was the main reason they went under. But it certainly was an issue in some locations. I think they went under because of some poor business management decisions. They had expanded the number of restaurants across the US very rabidly in the 1970s, got overextended financially, plus they lost some control of restaurant quality. And there was dissatisfaction among the restaurant managers with changes in their compensation program.

One of the interesting things was that just as conditions started to deteriorate, they had architects design a magnificent new headquarters edifice. I remember seeing the detailed architectural model. Needless to say, it never got built.

Sadly, I never worked at corporate headquarters in magnificently beautiful Santa Barbara, CA, but fortunately I was able to visit a few times a year. Of all the jobs I’ve had before becoming self-employed, Sambo’s was my favorite, by far.

gregory brown

August 3rd, 2012

I’d like o know how many of the chain’s Fair Weather Friends (who’d likely never been near the place before, preferring faster and cheaper food) stopped at a Starbuck’s along the way to order some overpriced brew to pour on the road.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Emphasis Mine

This Month In History, 1958: "My Daughter Is a Lesbian!"

Born On This Day, 1953: Tim Gunn

Because Fox News Cut Away From Khizr Khan

Federal Appeals Court Reluctantly Rejects Expanding Existing Civil Rights Law To Cover Sexual Orientation

Report: Florida Gov. Scott May Support Gay Rights, Post-Pulse

Sarah McBride Becomes First Transgender Person To Address a National Convention

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.