$325K gift to Minnesota’s marriage efforts

Timothy Kincaid

August 7th, 2012

From Pioneer Press:

A Michigan philanthropist has donated $325,000 to a group opposing a proposed constitutional ban on gay marriage in Minnesota.

Jon Stryker of Kalamazoo, Mich., gave the money to Freedom to Marry Minnesota’s political action committee on Tuesday, Aug. 7. according to state campaign finance records.

The numbers are starting to get big. I think that reflects an awareness that this time, we have a good chance at success.

jpeckjr

August 7th, 2012

Money raised does not guarantee a victory at the polls. But it does seem that all of the ballot item campaigns are garnering far more resources than past efforts. And, based on what I’ve seen on their websites, they are all running far more united and sophisticated campaigns.

The passage of Prop 8 in CA scared us. The passage of marriage equality in NY encouraged us — in-couraged us.

We simply must have a ballot box win this year. I believe we will!

Bernie

August 7th, 2012

Every little bit helps in the fight for equality.

Joe

August 8th, 2012

jpeckjr, I don’t know if it’s necessary requiring more money, but it’s definitely raising more. The energy behind this campaign is nothing short of amazing. This is the largest campaign in the history of Minnesota, candidate or issue. And yes, it’s incredibly united, and all across the entire state. No one in MN has ever seen as much motivation as the one to defeat this. Nothing is certain, but I believe we will.

Ben In Oakland

August 8th, 2012

Well if they run the same closet-based campaign as the last 32, we don’t have much of a chance.

MattNYC

August 8th, 2012

So I guess the NOMrods will now be boycotting replacement parts (hips, knees, etc.), since there’s almost no alternative to using Stryker parts or tools for joint replacements. Given the demographics of the haters–I won’t protest that boycott. :)

Mark F.

August 8th, 2012

Ben,

I think the shift in public opinion may now even be enough to overcome poor campaigns. But, of course, mistakes of the past shouild not be repeated.

Ben In Oakland

August 8th, 2012

You’re far more optimistic than i am.

I’ve been making the same complaint about these closeted campaigns for at least 16 years. I think we are reaching the point where the campaigns, at leats as they have been run, don’t change anybody’s mind. the movable middle is not movable, not at least by our present closet-based strategies.

As I’ve often said aobut prop. 8, we did as well as we did despite our campaign, not becuase of it.

Religion, freedom of religion, bigotry, kids.If we don’t talk about them, our opponents will, and not ono ur terms.

Soren456

August 8th, 2012

I’m with Ben, and for the reasons he notes.

I’d add another to them: Our opponents turn out (Chick-fil-A appreciation day mean anything?) while our supporters do not.

I truly believe that support in public opinion for our issues is higher than the negative. But when the negatives can be turned out with the ease and speed seen at Chick-fil-A, we have to be worried for that reason alone.

Our side has a miserable voting record.

Mark F.

August 8th, 2012

Of course, we all know that we have lost every time in the past. But if you consider the polling on the issue to be accurate, we should start winning this year. I expect we will win in every state this November, or at least 3 out of 4.

Secret Advocate

August 9th, 2012

Money is a start, and not an end.

The only poll that I’ll believe is the poll on Election Day, but I will state that the polls in Minnesota have not looked good for our side. There was the recent Public Policy Polling survey which showed the amendment trailing, but PPP’s write-up on the poll was unclear as to whether it was a poll of “registered voters” or “likely voters.” SurveyUSA recently did a poll which showed the amendment winning rather comfortably. (Our side was even trailing among voters aged 18-34.)

Unfortunately, I have to say that I won’t be surprised if the amendment passes with a support level in the mid-50’s.

As I’ve said before, our side has to change things up in our campaigns. Campaigns can’t just be “Give me benefits!” or “We love our gay kids [who are not seen in this ad].” We have to show John and Jane Citizen how marriage equality helps THEM.

These messages include: (1) preventing sham marriages (would John or Jane want their straight son or daughter to marry a gay person?), (2) preventing promiscuity among gay men, which is a public health issue, (3) helping the children who are being raised by gay couples, and thus helping the community in general, and (4) increasing the overall level of happiness in society, thus causing gay citizens to work better, to study better, and to have fewer health problems.

And our ads have to be LOGICAL. The recent ad that our side put forth in Minnesota (with the priest, the minister, and the rabbi walking into a bar) is cute, but I don’t think that it is effective because people won’t believe its message of “Support Religious Freedom.” Churches and synagogues already can solemnize same-sex unions right now.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1646: Execution in New Netherlands Colony

Today In History, 1741: An Early Ex-Gay Testimony

Today In History, 1962: Supreme Court Rules Physique Magazines Are Not Pornographic

Today In History, 1972: United Church of Christ Ordains First Gay Minister

Today In History, 1978: Rainbow Flag Debuts

Born On This Day, 1935: Larry Kramer

Born On This Day, 1963: George Michael

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.