Barney Frank Calls LCR “Uncle Toms”; LGBT Groups Disavow Charge

Jim Burroway

September 6th, 2012

Several leaders of LGBT organizations are distancing themselves from comments by Rep. Barny Frank (D-MA) that the Log Cabin Republicans have taken “Uncle Tom” as their role model. Frank first made those comments yesterday during an interview with Sirious/XM OutQ’s Michelangelo Signorile:

Frankly I’ve been appalled to see the Log Cabin club, in the face of this worse and worse record on public policy by Republicans on our issues,” Frank said. “Mr. Cooper said, ‘Well at least they’re not saying bad things about us.’ That’s just extraordinary. Again, 30 years ago when we were emerging from the vice of prejudice, I understood that. But no, we shouldn’t be accepting a kind of second class citizenship, [and saying], ‘You can treat us badly as long you don’t yell at us.'”

“They’re accepted on [the GOP’s] terms,” he continued. “They’re willing to be accepted with no rights — no right to marry, no right to serve in the military, no right to be protected against hate crimes, no right to be protected in employment. I’ll be honest: For 20 years now I’ve heard how the Log Cabins are going to make Republicans better, but they’ve only gotten worse. I now understand why they call themselves Log Cabin: their role model is Uncle Tom.”

Buzfeed’s Chris Geidner reports that Frank repeated that comparison to the Democratic National Convention’s LGBT Caucus toda, where he reportedly received a mixed reaction from the crowd. Geidner quotes HRC’s Chad Griffin: “That’s certainly not my perspective. The Log Cabin Republicans are good people doing good work.” He added: “We need all fair-minded Americans to rally to the side of equality, and that most definitely includes Republicans. They provide a voice within the Republican Party that’s important.”

The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force’s Rea Carey and Stonewall Democrats’ Jerame Davis also backed away from Franks comments, saying that they don’t reflect the positions of their organizations. But Davis added, “The truth is that they do play a certain role of kowtowing to the Republican Party in a way that borders on inappropriate itself.”

LCR responded via a press release:

“As far as Log Cabin Republicans are concerned, it’s a badge of honor to be attacked by a partisan hack like Barney Frank,” said Log Cabin Republicans Executive Director R. Clarke Cooper. “We understand that Barney has earned his protected place within the Democrat Party by being their attack dog on gay rights issues, demonizing Republicans and undermining efforts at bipartisanship that would actually improve LGBT Americans lives. We expect this kind of bile from Barney, especially when it plays into the Obama campaign’s efforts to divide, distract and deceive the American people.”

Cooper continues, “Frank calls us ‘Uncle Toms’ and pretends that Log Cabin hasn’t been on the front lines of the fight for equality. The truth is, by speaking conservative to conservative about gay rights, Log Cabin Republicans are doing some of the hardest work in the movement, work that liberals like Barney are unwilling to do and couldn’t do if they tried.”

AlexND

September 6th, 2012

As one who has voted Democrat for quite some time, I think that comment of Barney Frank is way off base, and just one of the many things I disagree with him on.
LCR HAS done many good things, and I applaud them for their efforts.

tim

September 6th, 2012

Who forced the issue with the DADT? The LCR. Meanwhile the HRC spent the last 10 years decorating their new HQ in DC.

RWG

September 6th, 2012

“They provide a voice within the Republican Party that’s important.”

Nonsense. The Log Cabin Republicans give aid and comfort to the enemy, they support the very people who work tirelessly to deny us equality under the law, who wish only to force the gay and lesbian community back into the closet or into exile or extinction. Rep. Frank is right.

Sami

September 6th, 2012

I’ll decide whether or not I agree with him when LCR announces whether or not they’re endorsing Romney.

PhilDC

September 6th, 2012

LCR did a great job on their DADT lawsuit, but that has nothing to do with the validity of their mission or the success they have had within the Republican. “We had DADT overturned in court therefor gays should vote Republican” is a non sequiter.

Timothy Kincaid

September 6th, 2012

I have to say that the Democrats and the gay groups have been classy.

tristram

September 6th, 2012

Sami has it right. The acid test will be whether LCR endorses Romney/Ryan and their promise of a NOM-approved Supreme Court.

Lucrece

September 6th, 2012

Give that LCR couldn’t resist from blasting Obama and spinning his endorsement of same sex marriage as divisive, calculating politics, Frank has not been too far off base.

I’ll be happy to be proved wrong if LCR chapters don’t offer Romney/Ryan endorsements.

Lord_Byron

September 7th, 2012

Timothy,

At least the liberals have way more class when it comes to the issue of LGBT rights than the conservatives. Do the democrats have a large number of members who have compared lgbt people to pedophiles, who have stated that lgbt members are a bigger threat than terrorists, et cetra?

Tell me though what do you call a group of people who support a group that sees them as an abomination and threat to society?

“The truth is, by speaking conservative to conservative about gay rights, Log Cabin Republicans are doing some of the hardest work in the movement”

Yeah, and there work really seems to be paying off. I mean look at all the conservatives who voted to include all that anti-lgbt planks in the GOP national platform.

“demonizing Republicans and undermining efforts at bipartisanship that would actually improve LGBT Americans lives.”

Again at this moment there really isn’t much bipartisanship of anything, but to argue that there is bipartisanship on this from the GOP is laughable. The same group that doesn’t even want to recognize civil unions cannot claim to have bipartisanship ideas here.

“a victory that Democrats delayed by refusing to bring ENDA to a vote when they had the chance and by dismissing the support of conservatives like Congressman Paul Ryan.”

So, Ryan voted for ENDA, so what? supports the Defense of Marriage Act, He voted in favor of the Marriage Protection act, voted against repealing the military’s “don’t ask don’t tell” policy and voted against expanding the country’s hate crime legislation to protect gay people. But sure he supported Ryan voted in 1999 in favor of banning same-sex couples from adopting in the District of Columbia

As for ENDA I found this article that stated
“When Republicans unsuccessfully tried a parliamentary maneuver to shelve the bill prior to its passage –– with what is known as a motion to recommit –– he joined 26 other GOP ENDA supporters in the unsuccessful effort to kill the bill they would vote for just moments later. That day, he voted against ENDA before he voted for it.”

“and our visible and vocal presence at the platform deliberations”

Which had absolutely zero positive effect on the platform.

Tony

September 7th, 2012

The LCR have their place in politics. At least there is SOMEONE trying to engage Republicans. What else are LGBT people supposed to do? Let them go unchallenged and just ignore them? What Barney Frank said is definitely true about GOProud, but not of LCR. LCR is actually working to advance gay rights in the Republican party. We need both sides if we are going to change peoples’ minds. Honestly, I think a lot of the hate is meant for GOProud, but directed at the wrong org. And let’s not pretend like gays can’t be petty. I think at least some of you who agree with Frank just can’t stand the thought of having a Republican administration whether it’s anti-gay or not.

Ms Rowena

September 7th, 2012

Well, Barney didn’t say anything that my crowd hasn’t been saying since we first heard of the LCR, lol, he just said it louder and got more attention. Frankly, it’s refreshing to hear a politician actually say what he or she really thinks as opposed to the usual “sanitized by polls and research” garbage to maximize campaign support and voter turn-out. And, believe me, I’m not much of Frank fan.

I guess as far as the LCR goes, there are always aiders and abettors in abusive and repressive situations, desperate for scraps from the master’s table and desperate to maintain the pretense that the master is basically good. There was a name for that in the 19th century. Came from some well-known novel. Gee, what was that term?

Richard Rush

September 7th, 2012

As long as there are some gay people who feel compelled to be Republicans, then I think the existence of LCR is a net-positive for all of us.

octobercountry

September 7th, 2012

You nailed it, Lord_Byron!

JFE

September 7th, 2012

HRC’s Chad Griffin, not Chad Griff.

Jim Burroway

September 7th, 2012

I’ve corrected the typo on Chad Griffin’s name.

Robert

September 7th, 2012

If it were not for GOProud, the LCR would still be considered quisslings. It’s only by benefit of a more loathsome group that they now appear to smell more sweet and are more palatable to some.

darkmoonman

September 7th, 2012

Let me know when the LCR stops voting for anti-Gay Republican candidates.

John Doucette

September 7th, 2012

“We expect this kind of bile from Barney, especially when it plays into the Obama campaign’s efforts to divide, distract and deceive the American people.”

Which side is trying to divide, distract and deceive the American people? To be Republican is to toe the Republican line without question. Want to know where the two parties stand? Read their party platforms.

Preston

September 7th, 2012

Gay Republican = Jewish Nazi; it defies logic.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today in History, 1610: Virginia Colony Enacts North America's First Sodomy Statute

Today In History, 1983: Pat Buchanan Says AIDS Is Nature's "Awful Retribution"

Today In History, 1988: Britain Enacts Section 28

Padres Finally Respond to Gay Men's Chorus Debacle

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1920: Harvard Establishes Secret Court To Investigate "This Pernicious Scourge"

Today In History, 1975: LAPD Chief Declines Gay Pride Invite, Proposes "Gay Conversion Week" Instead

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.