Paul Ryan: Denial of Same-Sex Marriage Is Part of “Agenda of Prosperity”

Jim Burroway

September 25th, 2012

Speaking at a campaign stop in Cincinnati today, GOP Vice Presidential candidate Rep Paul Ryan tied the denial of marriage equality for same-sex couples to the Romney campaign’s “agenda of prosperity.” Because, I guess, we can’t be prosperous if gay people are allowed to marry:

The things you talk about like traditional marriage and family and entrepreneurship. These aren’t values that are indicative to any one person or creed or color. These are American values, these are universal human values. And so what Mitt and I are offering is an agenda of prosperity for everybody to have a chance to climb the ladder and get out of poverty in the lives of self-suifficiency. That’s the whole point we’re offering with this five point plan.

MattNYC

September 25th, 2012

You know what has the potential to lift Americans out of poverty–especially if they repeal the Affordable Care Act??? MARRIAGE. Since the only way to get insurance for many people (both employed and unemployed) is to get on ones spouse’s employer-based medical insurance. And to insure children who may not be biologically related to the person who is employed.

Because medical costs are the greatest threat to a person’s or family’s financial security.

David Roberts

September 25th, 2012

I’ve been listening to that “hand up not a hand out” crap since Reagan. Part of that time I even defended it. GOP rhetoric is like ex-gay rhetoric, keeping people constantly reaching for the virtually unattainable to avoid genuinely helping them.

I don’t fault Romney for his millions, but I truly think the man does not realize how much different his life would have been if his family had not been who they were.

The rags to riches American Dream is not a common tale, and those who are just making it (or worse) are not moochers. They are average Americans at this point. But if you can keep people thinking that their own pot of free market gold is just over the next hill, you can get them to vote against their own self interests.

It’s “win the presidency through multi-level marketing.” And its only flaw is that it is a lie.

Lynnette C.

September 25th, 2012

Prosperity…a teaching in the charasmatic churches. A list of spiritual “must do’s” in order to be prosperous.
Hugh Hefner is prosperous, did he follow these presumed laws?
Approximately one billion dollars is taken out of the United States pockets by the refusal of allowing same sex couples to marry. [Congressional Budget Study, 2004 http://www.cbo.com] Government is cutting health care and education and yet missing the boat on gay cash. Look at New York and the financial increase they have experienced in allowing same sex marriage.
Must we be subjected to further propaganda that has NOTHING to do with increasing the United States economics,health care or education?
Prosperity? I say Hugh Hefner for President.

Jonathan Oz

September 25th, 2012

Paul Ryan’s lines keep getting swarmier and swarmier. Just be sure to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain…

Ryan

September 25th, 2012

This is being forwarded to my friends who call themselves social liberals and economic conservatives. By and large, those in charge of the GOP don’t see a difference.

MattNYC

September 25th, 2012

@Jonathan Oz

“sMarmier”???

Timothy Kincaid

September 26th, 2012

Oddly, Ryan’s point is so close to right that it’s wrongness is glaring and comical. Marriage, family and entrepreneurship are all tools towards a better, more stable, more prosperous life.

As MattNYC pointed out, marriage is a very valuable economic safeguard. Not only does it provide the legal protections he mentioned, it is a symbol, an indicator of “I’m settled down now, I have responsibilities, you can rely on me not to drop everything to move to Bali to see if I can become a professional surfer”.

And that’s where Ryan’s statement becomes ludicrous. Because “traditional marriage” is an entirely different animal from marriage. While marriage is a tool for increasing stability, “traditional marriage” is language used for limiting marriage, for reducing stability. There is nothing about the political campaign to restrict marriage and bar certain citizens from its value that is an economic benefit to anyone (other than Maggie and Brian).

Had he said that “marriage, family and entrepreneurship” are universal human values, he would merely be guilty of being blind to the existence that there are gay people in the universe of humans. But by adding “traditional”, he said something ludicrous.

Reed

September 26th, 2012

FINALLY – an admission that opposite-sex marriage’s privileges are designed to leverage economic superiority for its participants.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1895: Oscar Wilde Enters Bankruptcy

This Month In History, 1919: A Plea From An Invert

Born On This Day, 1966: Sean Patrick Maloney

Orlando-Area Republicans Back LGBT Protections

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Emphasis Mine

This Month In History, 1958: "My Daughter Is a Lesbian!"

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.