NOM Bashes Christians and People of Faith

Rob Tisinai

September 27th, 2012

I’m starting to think you could make a full-time job out of shredding the National Organization for Marriage’s fundraising appeals. Here’s the latest email gem from President Brian Brown:

“Repressive.” “Anti-human being.” “Anti-gay.” “Anti-woman.” “Anti-children.”

Does this sound like tolerance to you?

Well, these aren’t my words. They belong to Randy [sic] Weingarten, an Obama surrogate, homosexual marriage activist and powerful teachers’ union boss, who recently bashed marriage supporters, Christians, and all people of faith at Obama’s national convention.

False! Would you be surprised to learn Randi never mentioned Christians or people of faith in her speech? I’ll grant a courtesy that NOM refuses you: Here’s the video of her speech. Check for yourself.

Weingarten actually directs her harshness at the Republican platform. So let’s look at whom she’s “bashing“:

  • Opponents of marriage equality? Sure.
  • Christians? Some of them.
  • “All people of faith”? Absolutely not.

Think about that last claim. It only works if all people of faith oppose marriage equality — every last one of them. Does NOM really believe that? I see three possibilities.

1.  NOM is fully aware of what it’s saying, and means it.

Specifically: supporting marriage equality automatically means you’re a person of no faith. Not a person of a different faith, or a person of faith making a doctinal error, or who doesn’t think doctrine should dictate law. No. Voting for same-sex marriage is willful leap into Gehenna’s steaming pit. I know some of NOM’s supporters and regular blog commenters really do believe this.

2.  NOM is lying.

Specifically: NOM is saying something they don’t believe. They know many people of faith support marriage equality and oppose the Republican platform. They just don’t care. NOM’s most aggressive (and lucrative?) line of attack is that religious people are being persecuted, and this lie serves that interest. The mailer continues:

So make no mistake: if Barack Obama is re-elected in 40 days and marriage is re-defined for everyone, faithful Americans who support the God-ordained understanding of “one man and one woman” marriage will be treated in the law and in society as bigots and racists. Weingarten’s assault will become the opening salvo of an official, national policy for everyone.

NOM needs people to believe this, that the government is planning an attack on religion in general and on them in particular. Their livelihood literally depends on it.

3.  NOM is incoherent.

I firmly believe the average NOMmer can simultaneously hold two contradictory opinions in mind:

  • All supporters of same-sex marriage are sex radicals who hate religion.
  • Gay activists have fooled good people of faith into supporting same-sex marriage.

NOMmers need to believe both, so they do. They just…do. Their anti-gay fervor has smashed a baseball bat into their basic reasoning skills.

My guess, based on nothing but intuition and what I read, is that NOM and its allies are 65% incoherent, 25% fully aware and completely sincere, and 10% lying.

No matter what it comes down to, NOM is bashing the whole segment of Christians and people of faith who support marriage equality. It’s either misrepresenting their views, or accusing them of being liars whose show of faith is merely a sham. Either way, NOM’s strategy is in full effect:

Spread a falsehood.

Get money.


Lindoro Almaviva

September 27th, 2012

What I find most offensive is the fact that they love name calling but when they get a taste of their own medicine they start crying fowl. These are the type of people I feel no love, connection or sense of pity if I see them in danger. God forgive me, but I would probably look the other way if I saw anything bad happening to them.


September 27th, 2012

I think one thing that should be taken from the leaked “strategy memo” is that this is all deliberate — it’s done purely for effect. There is no belief involved, there is no sincerity, it’s all just a means of winning from people who have no integrity or fundamental honesty to begin with. It’s tactics, and I begin to wonder if it’s even really directed solely at gays — one of NOM’s stated purposes in that memo is to take down Obama, and this can very easily be read as an attack on him.


September 27th, 2012

If I had to choose, I’d say the second option that NOM is lying. That seems to be their modus operandi so to speak.

Timothy Kincaid

September 27th, 2012

..faithful Americans who support the God-ordained understanding of “one man and one woman” marriage will be treated in the law as bigots and racists.

Yes, they will have constitutionally protected freedom of speech, the right to assemble, and all other rights guaranteed to all citizens be the bigots and racists, or people who dedicate their lives to opposing bigotry in all forms.

…faithful Americans who support the God-ordained understanding of “one man and one woman” marriage will be treated in society as bigots and racists.

sorry, honey boo boo child, that’s going to happen either way. As equality become the norm rather than a new odd proposal, those who seek preference for their own kind and disadvantage for others are going to be treated the same whether the distincion is race or sexual orientation.

Brian Brown will be treated like a bigot and a racist in a fairly short time. Not because of Obama or any law change but because his statements, his behavior, and his demands will appear to be consistent with the commonly understood definition of bigotry.


September 28th, 2012

Oh come on. You KNOW they are making a ton of money off of this. It’s a cash cow. I think they are very cynical….and laughing all the way to the bank.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.