More on Anoka’s anti-gay Halloween ban

Timothy Kincaid

October 10th, 2012

More information is coming out on Anoka Minnesota’s continued war on gay teens. As we discussed yesterday, the city’s annual Halloween Parade barred Justin’s Gift, a group that seeks to help bullied gay kids with “the following needs: belonging, self-esteem, self-respect, and ultimately a realization of their importance in the world”, from participating. They claimed that they “have reached our maximum for walking units.”

But as local media investigates, the claim of “maximum” seems to have little credibility. It seems that neither the city nor the police had placed any kind of maximum on the parade nor was their any discussion of a maximum in any of the organizing committee’s literature. In fact, they hadn’t even yet given any indication of size to the city. (MPR)

“At this time we are unable to accept your application for the parade,” the letter said. “We have reached our maximum for walking units.”

However, the application for the parade license, obtained by MPR News, was not submitted until today — 15 days after Justin’s Gift was told the parade was full.

The application, submitted to the city of Anoka by Elizabeth McFarland, estimates the parade will include approximately 31,000 people, 250 parade units, 200 vehicles, 50 dogs and 12 horses. McFarland did not return a call seeking comment.

Anoka Police Chief Philip Johanson said he is not aware of any official limit on the number of parade participants, although he said the parade route needs to be approved in advance to allow enough time for public safety officials to redirect traffic.

Nor is this the first time that the Parade has made up special reasons to disqualify a gay group. (Pioneer Press)

He added that Twin Cities Pride initially was denied involvement in the parade last year because it didn’t list its theme on the application, even though the application didn’t ask for one, Fietek said.

Members eventually were allowed to walk, but some in the community complained, Fietek said.

“I am hoping this isn’t a case of the Anoka Halloween Committee caving to public pressure,” he said.

Also interesting is that the organization didn’t lead the protest. At first Jefferson Fietek, vice-President of the group and a local teacher, just assumed they were telling him the truth. (MinnPost)

Fietek said Monday that he can’t say the parade application was rejected because of the group’s LGBT focus, but he wishes the event’s organizers had considered the potential appearance and impact of excluding the kids — particularly at a time when families and educators are trying to rebuild.

“It doesn’t seem to be a very well-thought-out decision,” he said. “The history of the [Anoka Halloween] organization is showcasing youth organizations; that’s confusing to us. Especially when there’s outside groups marching, we got bumped?”

In a poll posted on its website, Justin’s Group members had voted to march dressed as their favorite fairy tale characters. “We foolishly assumed that given we were an Anoka-based youth organization, we were in,” said Fietek.

It was angry parents of the kids who started the petition and spread the word. But Fietek is now beginning to think that it truly was an example of discrimination.

As more of this story develops, I think it will prove to be a big embarrassment to Anoka. If, of course, they even have the capacity to feel embarrassed for their bigotry. And I wonder how this story might impact the upcoming vote to ban gay couples from marriage or civil unions.


October 11th, 2012

This does appear to be a case of discrimination since the explanation proffered is an obvious pretext. As these things go, this is really on the extreme end of the scale for pure malice. To discriminate against a gay group is one thing, but to discriminate against an anti-bullying group, where the marchers would all be kids and where the group is named after a recently deceased bully victim is mind boggling. MN has never been a hotbed of anti-gay hatred. I don’t know what it is about Anoka. It is like someone carved out a slice of Alabama circa 1977 and grafted it onto MN in 2012.

MN bans discrimination in public accommodations based on sexual orientation and this public parade is likely covered. If Lambda doesn’t come in here and represent Justin’s Gift in a lawsuit, there is something seriously wrong with our movement. Let there be a suit, let there be discovery and let it all become public.


October 11th, 2012

Anoka Minnesota, proudly carrying the bigot banner of Selma and Montgomery into the 21st Century!


October 11th, 2012

The grief and public abbrobation the parade organizers are getting from this decision . . . surely they realize it is not worth the time and energy it is taking to make up more lies and excuses. Just say “there’s always room for more in our parade” and get on with it.

Or, you know, run the risk the city will deny the parade permit on the grounds the private organizers are violating state non-discrimination law. Now THAT would be an interesting development!

Michael C

October 11th, 2012

I am getting so tired of the hatred coming from my neighbors in Anoka.

I do want to defend Minnesota, Minneapolis in particular. To those of you who have never been to Minneapolis, we are awesomely gay. You can’t throw a stone without hitting at least a couple of us. Every other house displays “Vote No” yard signs (MN is fighting prevent the passage of an anti-marriage amendment this Nov). “Gay” is such a non-issue to the vast majority of Minneapolis residents. While Anoka seems to be doing everything they can to make Minnesota look foolish (I’m talking to you, Michelle), Minneapolis and much of the surrounding communities truly represent the future of our Country.


October 12th, 2012

I’m not into conspiracy theories. But there’s really only one way that this ongoing petty anti-gay crap can go on in Anoka. Which is that there’s a bunch of pretty well connected locals pushing for it.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts


Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.