Blankenhorn speaks out against Minnesota marriage ban

Timothy Kincaid

October 19th, 2012

In 2010, David Blankenhorn was the chief (virtually only) witness for Proposition 8. This proved to be an unwise choice for two reasons: Blankenhorn was not qualified to testify on much of the matter to which he was the assigned witness, and Blankenhorn is a decent man who isn’t anti-gay and thus was susceptible to reasoned and well-articulated argument in favor of equality. So much so, in fact, that he now supports including gay and lesbian couples fully into the fabric of society.

Here he is on Minnesota’s proposed constitutional ban on equality:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ZExF-jMIKQw

Manheart

October 21st, 2012

powerful. if there is a god, his grace now shows in this man.

Robert

October 21st, 2012

This man was not and is not a “decent man”. A decent man doesn’t lend his name or his work to anti-equality. From everything out there the only reason he seemed to “change his mind” was because he got his ass handed to him in the 8 trial. Just like your praise of Melhman, I don’t get it. You praise people who have spent years and years plotting against us, and then when they have a sudden reversal all their ills seem to be forgotten.

Shameless.

Jay

October 21st, 2012

I remember a wonderful article from glbtq.com from a few years back. It is called “Confessions of a Blog Addict” and focuses on getrelgion.org and Blankenhorn’s site familyscholars.org. Here is the url: http://www.glbtq.com/sfeatures/confessionsofablog

The sections on “The Sad Case of David Blankenhorn” and on his blog are wonderful. Blankenhorn is obviously a great narcissist. He spun his participation in the Prop 8 case as an example of how brave he was and how cowardly other “family scholars” were for not stepping forward to tell the truth about how destructive gay marriage would be to the institution of marriage. But he has never been able to explain how that would work.

He got so bent out of shape by Frank Rich’s columns in which he said (implied really) that Blankenhorn was a bigot that he got 13 of his colleagues to sign a letter saying that he really was not a bigot. As “Anonymous,” the author of the glbtq.com article, said, Having Maggie Gallagher say that you are not a bigot, is like asking Bernie Madoff to say you are no crook.

Anyway, I am glad that Blankenhorn continues to “evolve,” but I suspect it is simply because his position has become untenable. You cannot say that you have no animus against gay people, but you don’t want them to have equal rights. You can’t say that you are a proponent of marriage, but spend all your time trying to prevent people from getting married.

Steven B

October 21st, 2012

I like how he frames the issue, not being about fairness, but about the need for society to come together and accept gay people and their families as having a place in this “shared space.”

Robert

October 22nd, 2012

I also find it suspect that the author of this piece praises a man who spent years and years actually damaging the LGBT comunitty, but pillories a woman for signing ONE petition. Calls the man “decent” after all his lies, slander and bad faith and demands the head of the black lady…

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Texas Leads A Five-State Lawsuit Over Obamacare Transgender Rules

Wikileaks Outs Saudi Gay Men, Male Rape Victims, People With HIV

Is Australia's Marriage Equality Plebiscite Doomed?

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1970: New York Times Looks At "Homosexuals In Revolt"

Today In History, 1977: "The Advocate" Reports Another FBI Document Dump On Gay Rights Groups

Today In History, 1977: Houston Klan: "We Endorse and Seek the Execution of All Homosexuals"

Today In History, 1988: Canada's Largest Protestant Church Accepts Gay Ordination

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.