Marriage Equality Wins In All Four States!

Jim Burroway

November 7th, 2012

In the very early morning hours, vote tallies in Minnesota and Washington meant that those two states have joined Maryland and Maine in rejecting attempts by anti-gay activists to deny marriage equality to LGBT couples.

Voters in Minnesota rejected a proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, making Minnesota the first state to do so since 2006, when Arizona voters rejected a similar ban. (Arizona voters later approved a narrower ban on marriage only in 2008.) With 99% of the ballots counted, 1,504,189 (51.3%) voted against the Amendment 1 while 1,396,879 (47.6%) who voted for it. In addition, there were 31,886 (1.1%) blank ballots cast for Amendment 1. Those were ballots in which voters marked their choices for other races but left the ballot blank for Amendment 1. Because the Minnesota constitution requires that a proposed amendment pass with a majority of all ballots cast, the blank ballots are effectively count as “no” ballots.

In Washington state,the vote counting continues in the all mail-in state, but the news was also good. Referendum 74 was ahead by 985,308 (51.8%) to 917,197 (48.2%). Because a ballot must be postmarked by November 7, the vote count is likely to continue for several more days, but observers are optimistic that Washington will join Maine and Maryland in choosing marriage equality at the ballot box:

The holdup was King County, which still had tons of ballots to count. Still, with 65 percent of King County voters approving R-74 in the initial count, and that trend likely to continue through the full count, seasoned political watchers were predicting victory. “Fifty-two percent, with King County what it is—it’s still time to call Washington State for marriage equality,” said Governor Chris Gregoire.

Similarly, Matt Barreto, who runs the Washington Poll, projected that R-74 would be approved and added that he expected Jay Inslee to be the next governor. “King County delivered both,” Barreto said.

Gregoire, who had a late-career conversion on marriage equality, called her daughters up to the podium at the Westin and thanked them for changing her mind. “They told me, ‘This is the civil rights issue of this generation,'” Gregoire said. “They’re right.”

In related news, voters in Iowa rejected an attempted recall of Iowa Supreme Court Justice David Wiggins, who joined in the unanimous 2009 decision which found denying marriage to same-sex couples unconstitutional. Social conservatives had mounted a fierce retention vote campaign to remove Wiggins from the bench. With 83% of the vote counted, Wiggins was retained with 54% of the vote.

These results represent a colossal, historic loss for National Organization for Marriage, anti-marriage strategist Frank Schubert, and anti-gay activists generally. Even if the decision in Washington should be reversed, this day represents a historic turning point in the fight for equality. Not only did voters defeat an attempt to permanently and constitutionally bar same-sex couples from marrying, but for the first time in history voters gave their approval for the right of their LGBT neighbors to protect their families with the rights and duties of legal marriage. There will be wins and loses to come, but future generations will today as the day in which the politics of division and demonization broke down and failed to do what they had reliably been counted on to accomplish before.  We have just seen history being made before our very eyes.

By the way, NOM has been silent so far. No press releases, no blog post. Just this plaintive tweet from about 11:00 p.m. EST last night:

Here is the latest rundown for all four states:

Maine, Question 1: Allow same-sex marriage.
Yes: 300,336 (53.3%) âˆš
No: 262,820 (46.7%)
75.5% reporting.

Maine’s Secretary of State has up to 20 days to verify election results, and the governor has 10 days to do the same. After that, there is a 30 day delay before the law to goes into effect. Marriage equality will go into effect sometime between December 7, 2012 (30 days after the election) and January 6, 2013 (60 days after the election).

Maryland, Question 6: Allow same-sex marriage.
Yes: 1,208,068 (52.0%) âˆš
No: 1,112,998 (48.0%)
97.5% reporting.

Marriage equality will go into effect on January 1, 2013.

Minnesota, Amendment 1: Same-sex marriage ban.
No: 1,504,189 (51.3)%  âˆš
Blanks: 31,892 (1.1%)
Yes: 1,396,879 (47.6%)
99.0% reporting.

There will be no change to Minnesota’s marriage law, which currently prohibits marriage between same-sex couples.

Washington, Referendum 74: Allow same-sex marriage.
Yes: 985,308 (51.8)%  âˆš
No: 917,197 (48.2%)
51.3% reporting.

Ballot counting will continue during regular working hours, with updated totals being posted throughout the afternoon for the next several days. If the current lead holds for Ref 74, marriage equality will go into effect on December 6, 2012.

JohnAGJ

November 7th, 2012

While I believe America will be sorry with reelecting Obama when it comes to fiscal matters (only slightly less so with Romney), I’m VERY happy with the results on these 4 referendums! Great consolation prize which I didn’t expect since I voted Libertarian this year. Thought I’d end up with nothing but am pleasantly surprised. :)

Steve

November 7th, 2012

Only the super rich will be sorry. If you think that the Republican so-called “fiscal policies” would have benefited anyone in the middle class you are severely deluded and live in Fox News’s alternate reality.

Stephen

November 7th, 2012

So we re-elect the most brilliant, courageous, and accomplished president I’ve seen in my lifetime along with other great additions to the senate and also win in all four states. What a great night for the forward-looking America I care about.

Jarred

November 7th, 2012

Given that NOM lost in all four states via popular vote, I’m curious to see what their new mantra will be. Obviously they can no longer honestly claim that the people have “defended traditional marriage” when it came to the popular vote.

Oh wait, when has NOM cared about being honest? Silly me.

Ryan

November 7th, 2012

Fantastic news! First Obama, now this. Hard to believe it was only 8 years ago the conservatives were using us to secure a Bush victory. I think ultimately, Prop 8 was a blessing in disguise. A gift from God, you might even say.

Markanthony

November 7th, 2012

It will be interesting to see how these votes affect NOM’s ability to raise money. I would imagine they are competing with heavily with anti-abortion groups, churches and religious schools/charities for these funds. If it looks like these votes really can’t win at the polls, those funders might start to cut their losses.

Peter

November 7th, 2012

Glad that marriage equality has gained public voter support.

(by the way, NOM tweeted a *plaintive* message, unless they were talking about a court case and were referring to the plaintiff)

JohnAGJ

November 7th, 2012

Steve: About all I’ll say on that is Obama is driving us over the fiscal cliff by pushing the gas pedal to the floor while Romney might have applied the brakes now and then. I have no illusions that the current GOP would have produced an economic miracle. It doesn’t matter now, the American people have spoken and the Dems now have 4 more years to prove their policies are better for the economy. I’m just glad that the social cons have taken a well-deserved drubbing and look forward to the GOP civil war.

Kate

November 7th, 2012

Anyone know the status of their court case in Maine about disclosing their contributors?

Ben in Oakland

November 7th, 2012

YAHOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Also…

NEENER NEENER NEENER!!!!!!!

JohnAGJ

November 7th, 2012

Forgot to add that what I’m looking for in the upcoming GOP civil war is that party actually living up to its claim of supporting smaller government and less government intrusion into our personal lives – something the social con nonsense has revealed is a complete lie. Either they truly stand for this or they can enjoy irrelevancy in national politics for years to come. In the meantime I’ll enjoy watching the ground change for the social cons as they lose on issue after issue while liberty on those matters at least will move forward. Of course I’ll be much poorer while doing so but such is life.

JohnAGJ

November 7th, 2012

Still waiting for NOM’s response to last night, feeling somewhat giddy I must admit. :)

Patrick

November 7th, 2012

The tide appears to have finally turned. We knew it was coming, thanks to the younger generation, it was just a matter of when.

The Lauderdale

November 7th, 2012

“Voters in Minnesota rejected a proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, making Minnesota the first state to do so since 2006, when Arizona voters rejected a similar ban.”

Okay, thanks for that. I saw a couple of news articles saying that Minnesota was the first state EVER to do this, and I was like, “What about Arizona?” I hadn’t gone it to verify it yet, though, so thanks for mentioning it here.

Mark Cross

November 7th, 2012

John, I also voted Libertarian, but I’ve done that for the last 20 years. I’m so proud of Obama’s “evolution” — and America’s evolution — on marriage equality. Libertarians have been pro-legalization of adult consensual relations since their inception. AND now ya can light up in WA, CO, and Detroit! Woo hoo!

JohnAGJ

November 7th, 2012

Good for you, Mark. I can’t say that I fully embrace libertarianism, but I’ve seen the light so to speak when it comes to social issues at least. I’m tired of nanny-statism from the Left AND the Right. As for the wins on pot, I was pleased to hear about those too. I always get funny looks when I say this, especially since I honestly have never tried it and beyond a mild curiosity about pot really don’t want to, but I do believe it’s a personal choice matter that government should butt out of. I see little difference between alcohol and pot. It makes no sense to me the arguments about criminalizing one while the other is perfectly legal. Seems to me that folks should be free to decide for themselves if they want to imbibe or toke a few on their own. Legalize it, regulate it and tax it is what I say.

Ryan

November 7th, 2012

The Supreme Court justice in IA also survived his recall attempt. The only had news is that Steven Saland lost in NY. NOM is crowing about it, which is kinda hilarious, since he lost to a pro-gay marriage Democrat. I guess that’s what passes for a victory for NOM these days…

Mark Cross

November 7th, 2012

John I’ve smoked it a few times with friends and family, but it’s certainly not a daily, or even a yearly habit. I rarely drink either, but it’s a moral issue. People should be free to live their lives as they see fit, enjoy their freedom, take responsibility for their choices, and love who they want to love.

Mark Cross

November 7th, 2012

I wanted to add how pleasantly surprised I am that we won in ALL 4 states. I expected more of a mixed bag. Next, CA, DE IL and ultimately DOMA right? What am I missing?

Mark Cross

November 7th, 2012

…and RI!

Ryan

November 7th, 2012

Ooh, Iowa Democrats kept control of their senate! This means no vote on getting rid of marriage equality there! Damn, this is a good day!

F Young

November 7th, 2012

@Marc Cross
“What am I missing?”

How about New Jersey, Minnessota and Hawaii?

Secret Advocate

November 7th, 2012

F Young is correct about Minnesota.

Another great victory last night was that the Democrats (called the Democrat-Farmer-Labor Party, or DFL, in Minnesota) re-took control of both houses of the Minnesota state legislature. (The reason why the anti-gay marriage amendment was on the ballot this year in Minnesota was that the state legislature unexpectedly flipped Republican in the 2010 “red tide” election, and Minnesota is one of 10 states in which only a simple majority of both houses of the state legislature is needed to send a proposed constitutional amendment to the voters.)

Now, with the DFL in control of the legislature and with Mark Dayton as the governor, Minnesota may actually get marriage equality soon. The vote on the amendment yesterday was a “mandate” in the literal sense of the term.

After all, the proponents of the amendment kept saying that “the people” should decide the issue. Well, now the people have spoken. It will be interesting to see how the NOM and its ilk try to argue that the people now should not be heard.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

By The Way...

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1961: Illinois Becomes First State to Rescind Sodomy Law

Today In History, 1967: England, Wales Rescinds Gross Indecency Law

Emphasis Mine

Today In History, 1977: Gays Zap Straight Bar Over "Fairies Swatter" Sign

Marco Rubio Announced As Featured Speaker At Anti-Gay Event In Orlando

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.