The Daily Agenda for Sunday, May 26
The Daily Agenda for Saturday, May 25
The Daily Agenda for Friday, May 24
Boy Scouts of America Votes To Allow Gay Members, Retains Ban On Gay Leaders
Nevada House votes to reverse marriage ban
The Daily Agenda for Thursday, May 23
It's Not the Principle, It's the Prejudice
Congratulations Mitch!
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Lindoro Almaviva
December 20th, 2012 | LINK
And we as a community are the better for that. I am not one to dance on anyone’s grave (I have that reserved for Maggie, Phelps, Scalia, and a couple self-important and self-appointed Christians) but this is as close as I get. If there is a God, may (s)He have mercy on him, because he is going to need it.
markanthony
December 20th, 2012 | LINK
There was apparently a whisper campaign among southern democrats that Bork wasn’t religious enough. The irony is factor is about as high as it gets.
Jay
December 20th, 2012 | LINK
I was taught that one should speak only good of the dead. Bork is dead. Good.
Pacal
December 20th, 2012 | LINK
Bork was a throughly unpleasant character and morally questionable.
During his Supreme Court confirmation hearing he deliberately posed as far more moderate than he was. (Translated he lied.)
Earlier Bork revealed just what sort of strong moral fibre he had. During the Watergate scandal when two of Bork`s higher ups refused to fire the special prosecutor Archibald Cox has ordered by Nixon. (One being fired the other resigning.) Bork then went along with Nixon`s attempt to short circuit the whole Watergate investigation and fired him.
For someone who liked to pose as holier than than thou he wasn`t.
jerry
December 20th, 2012 | LINK
There was a short clip of his confirmation hearing on the tube last night and a brief recounting of his career. I had forgotten he was Tricky Dicky’s toady in the Saturday Night Massacre debacle.
He was a legend in his own mind. History won’t be kind to him, his legacy has died with him. He won’t even get footnote status in 20 years.
F Young
December 20th, 2012 | LINK
“In 2011, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney appointed Bork co-chair of his Judicial Advisory Committee, to advise the campaign on judicial nominations and legal policy questions.”
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/19/us-usa-bork-idUSBRE8BI0YA20121219
Kip C.
December 20th, 2012 | LINK
Good riddance.
Désirée
December 20th, 2012 | LINK
so he got Borked
TomTallis
December 20th, 2012 | LINK
My eyes are dry.
Andrew
December 20th, 2012 | LINK
burn in hell motherf****r
Rod
December 20th, 2012 | LINK
Ms magazine either printed or reprinted a cartoon.
Panel 1. A dog in an alley loudly making noise: “BORK! BORK! BORK!”.
Panel 2. Two men, wearing shirts labeled “Senate Dog Catching Committee” holding the dog. The dog says “Meow”
PLAINTOM
December 21st, 2012 | LINK
He was finally Borked permanently.
Aurac
December 23rd, 2012 | LINK
Vicious, witless comments such as the above, motivated apparently by the fact that Bork had a view of homosexuality some people do not like, are expressions of cowardice.
homer
December 23rd, 2012 | LINK
Oh Aurac, I’ve been called worse things in my life.
Bork was a disgusting person with crappy morals and a hatred towards lots and lots of people who weren’t just like him. I’m not glad he is dead, but he deserves whatever names people choose to call him.
Priya Lynn
December 23rd, 2012 | LINK
Aurac said “Vicious, witless comments such as the above, motivated apparently by the fact that Bork had a view of homosexuality some people do not like, are expressions of cowardice.”.
See boys and girls, that’s what’s called a non-sequitor.
Hunter
December 27th, 2012 | LINK
OK, so Robert Bork is dead. That’s pretty much a function of time and our physical make-up. Am I sorry he’s dead? To be honest, I don’t care one way or the other: I didn’t know him personally, so I have no personal sense of loss, but I suspect I am thankful that he didn’t have the opportunity to have more influence on my life than he did, which was none.
Even the U.S. Senate does something right from time to time. Or it used to.
Dn
January 1st, 2013 | LINK
I believe that dead people should be spoken of in the manner they spoke of others while alive.
If Bork wanted to be spoken of kindly, he wouldn’t have been so outstandingly horrible. It’s not an expression of cowardice, it’s actually the Golden Rule.
Leave A Comment