The Daily Agenda for Saturday, May 25
The Daily Agenda for Friday, May 24
Boy Scouts of America Votes To Allow Gay Members, Retains Ban On Gay Leaders
Nevada House votes to reverse marriage ban
The Daily Agenda for Thursday, May 23
It's Not the Principle, It's the Prejudice
Congratulations Mitch!
Gay Couples Excluded from Immigration Bill Markup
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
MattNYC
January 15th, 2013 | LINK
As I said before, he’s a true soldier and believes in the chain of command, which starts with the CINC.
I hope that–in his confirmation hearings–he might be able to recall a personal story of knowing gay Marines while he was serving. Not required, but it would be a nice way of expressing his understanding of the commitment shown by all serving in uniform.
Timothy Kincaid
January 15th, 2013 | LINK
Well this is a second step in the right direction. Perhaps his hearings will give us further reasons to be less worried. I hope so.
Lindoro Almaviva
January 15th, 2013 | LINK
Wasn’t Hagel nominated for secretary of defense and Kerry for Secretary of Sate? Please correct me if I am wrong
Jim Burroway
January 15th, 2013 | LINK
You’re right. My bad.
Lindoro Almaviva
January 15th, 2013 | LINK
Ok,you threw me out for a loop there.
customartist
January 16th, 2013 | LINK
What I seem to be missing in Hagel’s comments is anything that would be in support of LGBT’s that is one inch beyond that which he needs in order to forward his appointment, …oh maybe like support for SS Marraige, or ENDA, or Housing Equality, etc.
I hear none of this.
His words ring hollow to me.
Reed
January 16th, 2013 | LINK
I doubt he’ll recall knowing any gay Marines, since during the time he served they would have been firmly in the closet. To ask further would be to call for speculation on his part.
As to other matters: “I FULLY support the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010 and value the service of ALL those who fight for our country. I know firsthand the PROFOUND sacrifice our service members AND THEIR FAMILIES make, and if confirmed as Secretary of Defense, I will do EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO THE EXTENT PERMISSIBLE UNDER CURRENT LAW to provide EQUAL BENEFITS to the FAMILLIES OF ALL OUR SERVICE MEMBERS.”
Let’s see . . . would “one inch beyond” be MORE THAN equal? Should he do EVERYTHING POSSIBLE, REGARDLESS OF CURRENT LAW?
Yeah, someone’s missing it. Or . . . enlighten us . . . what words do you want? Write the “acceptable” script – then you can start a petition and DEMAND the words you find acceptable will be said, with or without public floggings and acts of contrition. After all, clearly, he can’t possibly have changed ANY views in 18 years, despite his double recognition that these service members have families and ALL should be accorded EQUAL BENEFITS. (I know, sarcasm just doesn’t come across in cold print)
True, he didn’t pledge to work day and night to change “existing laws,” but that’s NOT something Secretaries of Defense do. They perform an essentially administrative, not a legislative function – and activist advocacy isn’t really their bailiwick.
Leave A Comment