January 15th, 2013
In a letter to Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), former Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE), President Barack Obama’s nominee for Secretary of State Defense, said that he now supports the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, and the expansion of equal benefits “to the extent permissible under current law” (PDF: 678KB/2 pages):
You asked if I would support the complete repeal of the discriminatory “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. I fully support the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010 and value the service of all those who fight for our country. I know firsthand the profound sacrifice our service members and their families make, and if confirmed as Secretary of Defense, I will do everything possible to the extent permissible under current law to provide equal benefits to the families of all our service members.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
MattNYC
January 15th, 2013
As I said before, he’s a true soldier and believes in the chain of command, which starts with the CINC.
I hope that–in his confirmation hearings–he might be able to recall a personal story of knowing gay Marines while he was serving. Not required, but it would be a nice way of expressing his understanding of the commitment shown by all serving in uniform.
Timothy Kincaid
January 15th, 2013
Well this is a second step in the right direction. Perhaps his hearings will give us further reasons to be less worried. I hope so.
Lindoro Almaviva
January 15th, 2013
Wasn’t Hagel nominated for secretary of defense and Kerry for Secretary of Sate? Please correct me if I am wrong
Jim Burroway
January 15th, 2013
You’re right. My bad.
Lindoro Almaviva
January 15th, 2013
Ok,you threw me out for a loop there.
customartist
January 16th, 2013
What I seem to be missing in Hagel’s comments is anything that would be in support of LGBT’s that is one inch beyond that which he needs in order to forward his appointment, …oh maybe like support for SS Marraige, or ENDA, or Housing Equality, etc.
I hear none of this.
His words ring hollow to me.
Reed
January 16th, 2013
I doubt he’ll recall knowing any gay Marines, since during the time he served they would have been firmly in the closet. To ask further would be to call for speculation on his part.
As to other matters: “I FULLY support the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010 and value the service of ALL those who fight for our country. I know firsthand the PROFOUND sacrifice our service members AND THEIR FAMILIES make, and if confirmed as Secretary of Defense, I will do EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO THE EXTENT PERMISSIBLE UNDER CURRENT LAW to provide EQUAL BENEFITS to the FAMILLIES OF ALL OUR SERVICE MEMBERS.”
Let’s see . . . would “one inch beyond” be MORE THAN equal? Should he do EVERYTHING POSSIBLE, REGARDLESS OF CURRENT LAW?
Yeah, someone’s missing it. Or . . . enlighten us . . . what words do you want? Write the “acceptable” script – then you can start a petition and DEMAND the words you find acceptable will be said, with or without public floggings and acts of contrition. After all, clearly, he can’t possibly have changed ANY views in 18 years, despite his double recognition that these service members have families and ALL should be accorded EQUAL BENEFITS. (I know, sarcasm just doesn’t come across in cold print)
True, he didn’t pledge to work day and night to change “existing laws,” but that’s NOT something Secretaries of Defense do. They perform an essentially administrative, not a legislative function – and activist advocacy isn’t really their bailiwick.
Leave A Comment