NOM polls Rhode Island

Timothy Kincaid

February 14th, 2013

The National Organization for Marriage is touting it’s latest public relations ploy, a poll of Rhode Island voters about whether the legislature should treat all citizens equally. And, as usual, it’s all just a game.

They set the stage with a question about whether participants approve of Governor Chafee (he’s not very popular but he’s the face of the marriage movement) and then come the relevant questions:

5. Have you heard or read anything in the news recently about the issue of same-sex marriage in Rhode Island?

96% yes
4% no

6. Recently the Rhode Island House of Representatives voted to redefine marriage to include two persons of the same sex. A resolution has been introduced in the Senate to allow the people to vote on the definition of marriage. Which of these two positions do you think is correct: do you think the definition of marriage should be decided by the voters of Rhode Island, or should it be decided by the Rhode Island General Assembly?

74% voters
20% general assembly
7% don’t know/no response

7. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: “voters in 35 other states have been able to vote on the definition of marriage in their state, and Rhode Island voters deserve the same opportunity.” Do you …

60% – Strongly agree
18% – Somewhat agree
10% – Somewhat disagree
8% – Strongly disagree
4% – Don’t know / no response

8. Regardless of how you feel about the issue of same-sex marriage, should the Governor and General Assembly consider making same-sex marriage legal while there is an economic crisis in our state, or should the economic crisis be dealt with first before the issue of same sex marriage is considered?

31% – First statement
55% – Second statement
15% – Don’t know / no response

By now many of you are laughing. It’s all a bit too obvious.

Never once does the National Organization for Marriage ask voters whether they support marriage equality or even if they support the specific bill before the legislature. I can only assume that the don’t dare because they know the answer: Rhode Islanders support equality.

Instead NOM pits legislators “redefining marriage” against voting rights. Them untrustworthy scoundrels vs The People.

But the truly amusing part isn’t even their push poll language. It’s NOM’s sample.

As it turns out, NOM doesn’t report their age demographics using the standard voter breakouts. But by using the 2004 voter demographics and making some estimations, we can get close enough.

For Rhode Island

18 – 39: voters 31%; NOM 13%
40 – 49: voters 19%; NOM 16%
50 – 59: voters 19%; NOM 37%
60 plus: voters 31%; NOM 34%

So even though half of Rhode Island voters are under 50, only 29% of NOM’s sample is in that range.

And now let’s look at faith. By coincidence, Gallup released today a listing of states by order of those who find religion to be important in their daily like and who attend church every week or almost every week. Rhode Island weighed in at forty-fifth with only 29% being very religious.

But NOM’s sample was, shall we say, a bit more devout.

26% of NOM’s sample goes to church 1 to 3 times a month, 22% makes it 4 times a month, and another 9% make it 5 or more times a month.

So yeah, NOM’s doing it again. I guess they’re polling religious retirement communities and thinking that represents the state’s voters.

But it just must be depressing as Hell at NOM headquarters. Even after trying to get their participants hyped up about their right to vote; even after fears about a bad economy, still a third of their doddering church ladies still want the legislature to vote for equality now.

It makes you wonder, do they go home at night and cry?


February 14th, 2013

I think the “redefinition” issue can be used to advantage – I’ve done it in conversation: “I think it’s good we’ve redefined marriage because the old definition isn’t inclusive and doesn’t accurately describe the real marriages that exist today.”

Priya Lynn

February 14th, 2013

Great point Raybob, is it okay with you if the rest of us use that?

Dave H

February 14th, 2013

“Do they (NOM) go home and cry at night?”

Not as long as their nice paychecks aren’t bouncing.

Richard Rush

February 14th, 2013

NOM: National Organization for Misinformation


February 14th, 2013

Brian Brown has been seen crying in public

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.