Hillary Clinton endorses marriage equality

Timothy Kincaid

March 18th, 2013

ABC News:

Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton announced her support for gay marriage Monday, putting her in line with other potential Democratic presidential candidates on a social issue that is rapidly gaining public approval.

Clinton made the announcement in an online video released Monday morning by the gay rights advocacy group Human Rights Campaign. She says in the six-minute video that gays and lesbians are “full and equal citizens and deserve the rights of citizenship.”

“That includes marriage,” she says, adding that she backs gay marriage both “personally and as a matter of policy and law.”


March 18th, 2013

More than a little late there, Mrs. Clinton. But oh well. Welcome. And let me be the first to congratulate you on your DNC Presidential nomination.


March 18th, 2013

More than a little late there Ryan, I doubt you’re her first congratulator ;)


March 19th, 2013

I was slightly critical of her change the other day–being late and doing it for political reasons–and my partner reminded me that while all the Democratic “politicians” had a chance to change over the past two years, she was Secretary of State and was precluded — by tradition — from taking a stance on a domestic policy matter.

I do think that’s a fair cop. Especially since she DID push very hard on promoting equality for LGBT people around the world using her position.


March 19th, 2013


I think your partner got it right, and as Secretary of State she implemented (and I’d suggest, went further than expected) LGBT rights in the Federal Government. She extended a lot of rights, housing stuff and benefits as Obama began taking a more Equality minded position.

I also think it’s about time, but did understand that as Secretary of State she really couldn’t do as much political stuff as she could have as private citizen.

LAte to the formal party, but she has had action that supports her new public position on the matter.

Timothy Kincaid

March 19th, 2013

I don’t think that there was anything about her position that explicitly or implicitly prohibited Hillary Clinton from expressing her agreement with the domestic policy of the President and his administration or the constitutional interpretation of the Attorney General.

There may have been foreign positioning concerns, but as the world’s interpretation was that President Obama supports marriage equality, I think that the international community placed little distinction on the fact that Secretary Clinton had not made such a declaration.

Her decision to not announce her support prior to this time may have been motivated by a host of reasons. But I very much doubt that any sense of traditional preclusion for agreeing with the administration was one of them.


March 19th, 2013


It’s been historicly the norm for Secretary of States to refrain from any political activity while in that office. She didn’t opin on much of anything other than the issues directly in front of her during her tenure. She implemented and expanded on the policies of the President in regards to LGBT rights, in her official capacity, but she didn’t speak out about those issues in a domestic setting.

I believe the only real mention she made was in regards to the Uganda kill the bills legislation.

I also do not recall any Secretary of State in my lifetime engaging in political activity outside their job, while in office.

Her entire political carrer as Senator and as Secretary of State has been very by the book, theres nothing to suggest she would not stand on the historic standards of the Office.

Neon Genesis

March 23rd, 2013

Hillary Clinton’s history on gay rights seems to be similar to Obama’s. She supported civil unions while opposing gay marriage but she supported gay rights on just about every other issue. She also opposed a federal amendment to the constitution defining marriage as between a man and a woman and supported the repeal of DADT. She seems to have followed in Obama’s footsteps in “evolving” on gay marriage though I suspect her previous opposition to civil unions was out of political pragmatism rather than some tradition about the Secretary of State not speaking out on political issues. But I’m curious if she still believes marriage should be left up to the states or if she believes it should be handled at a federal level?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.