Nevada Senate Approves Repeal of State Marriage Ban as Senator Comes Out During Debate

Jim Burroway

April 23rd, 2013

Late last night, the Nevada Senate voted 12-9 to approve Senate Joint Resolution 13, which would repeal the state’s constitutional amendment limiting marriage to one man and one woman, and replace it with a provision requiring the recognition of all marriages between two people “regardless of gender.” One Republican, Sen. Ben Kieckhefer (R-Carson City), joined eleven Democrats to support the measure, which marks the first time a state legislative house voted to repeal a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

The vote came after more than an hour’s debate which saw Catholic marriage equality supporter Sen. Ruben Kihuen (D-South-central Las Vegas)) say that he would support marriage equality even though “I don’t know if I’ll be allowed in church on Sunday.” Mormon marriage equality supporter Sen. Justin Jones (D-Southwest Las Vegas) cited his gay brother-in-law, who he sees in church every Sunday. “I would rather lose an election than look my brother-in-law in the eye every Sunday and tell him he doesn’t have the same rights as I do,” he said.  But the most dramatic moment came when  Sen. Kelvin Atkinson (D-North Las Vegas) declared publicly for the first time that he was gay:

“I’m black. I’m gay,” Atkinson said in a trembling voice after describing his father’s interracial re-marriage that would have been banned earlier in American history. “I know this is the first time many of you have heard me say that I am a black, gay male.”

Atkinson went on to rebut the argument that gay marriage threatens any other definition of marriage.

“If this hurts your marriage, then your marriage was in trouble in the first place,” he said.

The resolution now goes to the Nevada Assembly. If it passes the lower house, it will again have to pass both houses in 2015 before being sent to voters.

jpeckjr

April 23rd, 2013

I’m trying to absorb “Catholic marriage equality supporter” and “Mormon marriage equality supporter.” Feeling faint. Must sit down.

customartist

April 23rd, 2013

Republican Mormon Nevadans are OK with Prostitution, but not gays who want to commit to each other.

Shouldn’t AUTHENTIC defenders of the Church and of Families be using their millions trying to outlaw Prostitution, which has real affect on hetero marriages and families, Rather Than on a “teeny 1%” of the population?

Just check out the proximity of Carson City Politicians to Ranches-of-Prostitution in Mormon-heavy Nevada:

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=kit+kat+ranch&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45512109,d.eWU&biw=1093&bih=478&wrapid=tlif136672607930910&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&sa=N&tab=wl

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=kit+kat+ranch&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45512109,d.eWU&biw=1093&bih=478&wrapid=tlif136672607930910&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&sa=N&tab=wl

It appears that Prostitution has replaced the practice of having multiple wives?

Priya Lynn

April 23rd, 2013

Did this marriage ban go through the same lengthy process to get passed?

Customartist, should single men be denied access to prostitutes because some married men use their services? Not in my book.

Robert

April 23rd, 2013

Customartist,

I completely get what you are saying. IF the individuals are as “Family” oriented as they claim, and defenders as such, their concentration on Marriage Equality to the exclusion of ANY actual issue that affects families in a negative way makes them pretty hypocritical. They do not seem to care about the real issues that affect marriages.

AND, it’s pretty obvious to most people that you have no desire to keep other men from prostitutes because of the failure of some married men to keep their business in their pants.

Any honest reading of what you said would not come to the conclussion that you were wanting to ban anything.

You are correct that they only concentrate on one thing to the exclusion of all others and that their “morality” is a bit strained on this being anyhting other than homophobic action. I didn’t see ANY straw men in your argument, and I won’t put words into your mouth.

They could also concentrate on banning Divorce for people involved in religous marriages if their concern was authentic, but nope, they like being married time after time after time.

jerry

April 23rd, 2013

First, I’m glad we have one more out gay legislator and second, I hope we won’t keep banging away on outlawing divorce. If we really want to get at them, we should promote outlawing remarriage as long as the divorced partner is still alive.

jpeckjr

April 23rd, 2013

@Priya Lynn. Since this joint resolution repeals a constitutional amendment, it is itself a constitutional amendment and, therefore, must go through the process for any constitutional amendment. I don’t know what that is in Nevada.

jpeckjr

April 23rd, 2013

Found out how Nevada amends its constitution. When the legislature initiates an amendment, as in this case, both the Senate and the Assembly must approve the proposed amendment. Then, after the next general election for the legislature, the proposed amendment must be considered again and be approved by a majority in both chambers. After that, the amendment is submitted to the voters and must be approved by a majority of voters.

So I’d guess we’re at least two years and possibly more from seeing marriage equality in Nevada. This joint resolution is the first step in the process. The one man / one woman amendment was approved in 2002.

Priya Lynn

April 23rd, 2013

Jpeckjr, I just don’t remember any of these anti-marriage amendments going through this long involved process in the first place, it seemed like they were all slapped into place pretty quickly.

jpeckjr

April 23rd, 2013

@Priya Lynn. Every state is a little different, I’m sure. Prop 8, because it was a citizen initiative, went on the ballot at the next general election.

Some states don’t have citizen initiatives at all. Some have only referendum — an act of the legislature that is submitted to the voters. But I think all states require constitutional amendments to be submitted to the voters. Amendments to the US Constitution are not submitted to the voters.

Great. Now I’m curious about this. I feel a research project coming on!

ebohlman

April 23rd, 2013

In Nevada, a legislatively initiated amendment has to be passed by two consecutive legislative sessions and then go to the voters. A citizen-initiated amendment has to go to the voters in two consecutive elections, which is how the anti-equality amendment was passed (once in 2000 and once in 2002).

jpeckjr

April 23rd, 2013

Thanks, ebohlman. ThinkProgress in its report on Nevada says the earliest it could go to the voters is 2016.

MCB

April 24th, 2013

The 2016 year made me decide to look up what the Almighty Nate Silver predicted Nevada will look like by then: 59.2% approval.

Of course, the Supreme Court could decide to make this whole process go a lot faster…

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1969: New York Dailies Take Their First Stab At Stonewall

Born On This Day, 1892: Henry Gerber

Social Conservatives In Morelos Mobilize To Block Marriage Equality

Federal Court Re-opens Marriage Equality Case Over Mississippi's "Religious Freedom" Law

Morelos On the Cusp Of Enacting Marriage Equality

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1969: Stonewall

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.