FEC: no gay couple political contributions

Timothy Kincaid

April 26th, 2013

Dan Winslow is competing for the Republican nomination for US Senate in Massachusetts. And in what was probably more of a statement than an inquiry, he formally asked the Federal Election Commission whether he could apply the federal election rules equally to gay married couples and straight married couples.

The answer, not surprisingly, is no. As FEC Chairwoman Ellen Weintraub explained:

Because Mr. Winslow expressly limited his request to this narrow issue, I very reluctantly voted to answer his question in the negative. Regardless of my personal views of DOMA, I must adhere to the law until it is repealed by Congress or invalidated by the Supreme Court. I write separately to emphasize that my vote today was in no way intended to endorse the discriminatory, irrational burden that DOMA places on political participation by individuals in same sex marriages.

But he made his point. He reminded voters that even in an equality state like Massachusetts, the law still isn’t equal.

“It’s sad that in the 21st Century the federal government is still denying certain people their First Amendment rights as guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution,” Winslow said in a statement. “However, I am encouraged by the FEC’s advice that I return to them as soon as DOMA is overturned and they will happily reverse their decision. I strongly believe DOMA will be overturned by the Supreme Court and I look forward to take the FEC up on its offer.”

I wish Winslow well in Tuesday’s primary election.


April 26th, 2013

Well I’m glad that he’s taking up the banner of giving gay people equal rights to give to political campaigns. I can’t think of an issue that could possibly be more important to a gay family than the ability to make political donations like heterosexually married couples.

Yes, I understand the greater ramifications but the fact that Winslow limited his statement to the denial of a right to make a joint political donation seems a bit thoughtless and insulting all things being considered.


April 26th, 2013

Thoughtless and insulting? He probably already knew the outcome of this and only did it because he thought it would resonate with Republicans. And it probably will.

We are talking about the Republican who supported fully equal marriage rights for gay couples, aren’t we?

Timothy Kincaid

April 26th, 2013


Actually this goes to the very heart of institutional discrimination: the right to compete fairly in the political process.

In Massachusetts there are likely many ways in which same-sex marriages are not treated the same, but it’s not like Florida, for example. So Winslow picked the area in which he was forced to discriminate. Winslow, who has support from gay couples, is forced to discriminate against them.

We all know that this was mostly a PR effort. The number of couples who this will impact is low. It was more a chance for Winslow to distinguish himself from his competitors and to also raise an issue that most people never consider – that there are still small ways in which a legally married same-sex Massachusetts couple are reminded that they are inferior.

And it’s never an insult for someone to stand up against discrimination.


Winslow is well known to be pro-gay. So, yes, in this case we’re talking about the Republicans who fully support equal marriage rights.


April 26th, 2013

I only think it’s insulting that he didn’t make the point that this is just one of MANY ways where Massachusetts’ same sex marriages are treated unequally at the federal level.

I appreciate the gesture however in not making the point that this is just one of many examples it makes his actions seem baldly and purely political when I honestly believe that his intentions were more than that.

Even still I think it’s another sign of progress.


April 27th, 2013

I must confess that I find couple political contributions strange. We’re in the 21st century, women have had the right to vote for some decades. I’m not obliged to support the same political party or the same candidate as my spouse. But then I also live in a country where there is no joint tax return.

Corey Mondello

April 27th, 2013

Oh dear, I smell a rat, a gay-friendly Republican. Wondering if he is pulling a Romney, who said he was more gay friendly than Ted Kennedy when e was running for a seat in the Senate, one of his many failed attempts to be elected anything other then an a-hole.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.