A sad example of internalized homophobia

Timothy Kincaid

June 11th, 2013

I usually hate the term “internalized homophobia”. Far too often it’s flung as a weapon against some gay person who disagrees with whatever the accepted position must be.

(Vote for a Republican? Internalized homophobia! Disapprove of some gay person’s extreme behavior? Internalized homophobia! Refuse to be in an open relationship? Internalized homophobia! Enjoy country music, refuse to watch Partners, go to the gym, avoid the gym, think Rachel Maddow actually does look ‘mannish’, love RuPaul, hate RuPaul, not know who RuPaul is, pretty much anything anyone can think of, and you’re just oozing internalized homophobia!)

But sometimes the description is accurate. Sometimes a person who has a homosexual orientation also has such a so gut-level, knee jerk response, negative about every aspect of gay people and/or their lives that it can only be seen as homophobia.

I’ve mostly tried to avoid discussing the small handful of same-sex attracted people who have captured a moment in the spotlight due to their opposition to civil equality in marriage. There are a good many people, straight and gay, who are not comfortable with the idea of gay marriage not out of malice but due to reasons that are based on their beliefs about marriage and children or even just a lack of good data.

So while it may seem as though by now all such reasons should be transparent to gay people, I still allow that some do not think that marriage is the appropriate venue for same-sex relationships. And I see little value in speculating about their motivations.

I’ve not called Doug Mainwaring names or demeaned Robert Oscar Lopez. Both claim to be gay men and to have some notion of the nature of gay men and use this as a basis for high-profile declarations about the dangers of allowing same-sex couples to be recognized in law. But while I find their choices and their rhetoric to be dishonorable, until now I’ve not assailed their character.

However in the latest piece written for the Witherspoon Institute about what he learned from French opposition to equality, Lopez reveals his own valuation of his character. It isn’t very high.

The French resistance to same-sex marriage has demonstrated that an ostensibly progressive nation that had little issue with homosexuality as a moral question can change its mind, not based on ignorance of reality, but based on knowing more about what same-sex marriage really means.

The drop in support for same-sex marriage came with education and broader public debate. As the French knew more gay people individually and learned more about the ramifications of their legalized marriage on the community at large—especially children and poor communities overseas targeted for adoption and surrogacy—they liked the idea of same-sex marriage less and less.

Lopez’ basic assumption in this piece is that the more you get to know gay people, the more you hate them.

I suggest that Lopez does not speak for me or any gay people I know. I’m sure that Lopez would insist that it is the disreputable homosexual activists about which he speaks, but sadly, I think he speaks for himself.

This looks to me like a recurrence of a once-common phenomenon, the gay person who so hates who they are that they overlay their own perceived flaws – their own self-imposed shame – on a gay community populated only by their own imagination.

Yes, I believe that this is a real and all too sad example of internalized homophobia.


June 11th, 2013

Not “vote for a Republican” but rather “campaign for, promote, defend and vote for a rabidly anti-gay Republican (or Democrat)” might rightfully get you labeled with internalized homophobia.


June 11th, 2013

Considering Maddow “mannish” isn’t internalized homophobia, it’s sexism. Plain and simple. She is a female and looks like many things in life are irrelevant,as a female she shouldn’t have to endure, nor should we allow to stand, are comments about her physical apperance…

The ONLY thing mannish about her is her haircut, except for the fact that many very “femaleish” women have the same haircut, that and she doesn’t wear dresses or tons of make-up.

Remarking on an individuals appearance is less than honorable when doing so to demean, and the ONLY reason one would remark on her apperance IS to demean her by insinuating that she isn’t “female” enough. Transgender MTF often have the same problem with society. Sad to see you use that as an acceptable comment to make, or at least excusing it as “accurate” and in no way homophobic, internalized or externalized…


June 11th, 2013

I’m curious about the “drop in support” for same-sex marriage that he claims. I’ve found no evidence of it, although some polls are conflating the issues of same-sex marriage and adoption by gay couples, which has never had strong suppot. The support for marriage itself seems still to be running around 60%. That doesn’t strike me as the death knell of the idea.

Bill T.

June 11th, 2013

My first impression of Mr. Lopez leads me to believe that he would get the seat wet even if he sits to pee.

Priya Lynn

June 11th, 2013

“My first impression of Mr. Lopez leads me to believe that he would get the seat wet even if he sits to pee.”.



June 11th, 2013

Lopez’s writings verge on the bizarre and are nearly impossible to follow. I have never understood why NOM thinks he is so brilliant. He surely isn’t actually changing anyone’s mind. Seems like he would repel alot of fence sitters.

Regan DuCasse

June 11th, 2013

Priya, that means his aim wouldn’t be too good no matter where he pointed his hose. Er, so to speak.
He’s a liar anyway, about the drop in support for marriage. It’s just the OPPOSITE.
In the same way, Frijid Barjot said that the process of equality came about ‘undemocratically’. She meant that it didn’t by a majority vote of the public, but in a way similar to the way the Senate and Congress would do it. By REPRESENTATIVES of the people. And it wasn’t a narrow vote, but a strong two thirds.
But NOM and their cohorts lie all the time in order to get the public riled up at gay people, and Manif pour tous has tried to do much the same thing in France, and it backfired legislatively, but still had very tragic consequences after all and a teenager paid with his life.
Lopez and Mainwaring are walking contradictions in ethical terms. They are conflicted people who don’t think they are, but are misrepresenting gay people in the worst way for even worse reasons considering the stakes.
I think they are despicable.

Priya Lynn

June 12th, 2013

Thanks Regan.

Regan DuCasse

June 12th, 2013

Very close together in different parts of the country, mass shootings have had ONE thing in common: the killers all had a history of severe CLINICAL mental illness. Their families knew about it and it manifested fairly early in the adolescence of these people.
Or, there at least is some kind of tendency to VIOLENCE in some way and intense obsession with it beyond normal parameters.
It’s taken for granted that young boys would like such a thing. It’s even CULTIVATED as a sign of masculinity. Boys who aren’t violent or brutish, are ridiculed.
But when someone breaks out as a serial rapist or mass killer, it makes national news and there are memorials and shrines to the victims until the next DAY or NEXT WEEK when it happens all over again.
The Santa Monica incidents, that occurred this week came from a young boy who witnessed domestic violence and himself had untreated mental illness.
The next incident was a gang shooting.

If these ‘traditional marriage’ proponents had put half their effort into advocating for mental health care in which there was LONG TERM hospitalization and reduction of violence in homes that damaged children, I’d believe they REALLY cared about the welfare of families.
But as I’ve said, they blew me off when I told them that domestic violence endangered children more than marriage equality ever could.

Phony sons of bitches.

Gene Touchet

June 12th, 2013

The latest French poll I saw indicates a majority supporting same-sex marriage; slightly less supporting adoption; and many less supporting medically assistance pregnancy.

Marriage is OK in France; the other two issues less so.


June 12th, 2013

I am confused. Robert Oscar Lopez is an associate professor of English and classics. How does that, coupled with being gay make him an expert on current psycho-socio-cultural matters?


June 12th, 2013

How ironic. Mr. Lopez, who seems to be a respected, educated, contributing member of society was chosen to speak before the this nation’s lawmakers. Isn’t this, in itself, a perfect example and testimony to the quality of same sex parenting? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CotB5fUzj38

Gene in L.A.

June 12th, 2013

The fact that the term is frequently misused should not persuade us that internalized homophobia is not a serious problem. It’s more subtle. Just as one of the birthrights of our society is an ingrained tendency toward racism, so there is such a tendency toward homosexuality. Most people are able to overcome such early conditioning as media influence and religious upbringing to see the reality of our common humanity. But we all contain within ourselves such seeds of self-destruction. Mr. Lopez is simply very much at the affect of this affliction.

Gene in L.A.

June 12th, 2013

My mistake, I should just have posted “so there is such a tendency toward homophobia,” not homosexuality. Sorry!

Priya Lynn

June 12th, 2013

I’m not aware that the term is overused. I’ve never heard of anyone being accused of internalized homophobia for voting Republican, refusing to be an open relationship or any of the mentioned alleged examples.

Ben In Oakland

June 12th, 2013

Mr. Lopez is angry because his mommy didn’t love him very much and apparently, his daddy didn’t love him at all.

He doesn’t need a podium, he needs a therapist


June 12th, 2013

Tim was just taking writers liberty making his point. None of his examples were serious, which was the pint he was making.

Yeah, if you read ROL’s Blog you will see that his is one sandwich short of a picnic. I listened to less than 10 seconds of that video clip and he did not come out bi-sexual 20 years ago. He said he was 100% gay until he met his wife and that his Baptist Religion played strongly into him discovering that he *really wasn’t gay* after all. What a surprise! Hey I am Bi-sexual not gay! Okay whatever.

It is my opinion that it is his religious faith which he has only written about a couple times, he does a good job of hiding that, it is his religious faith (Baptist) that has messed him up bad. I won’t give you the link to his blog, if you want to read it you’ll have to go hunt for it. It is English Manif

Richard Rush

June 13th, 2013

Ben said, “Mr. Lopez is angry because his mommy didn’t love him very much and apparently, his daddy didn’t love him at all.”

So, what does Lopez do? He goes out in public and demonstrates how he’s really not very lovable.

Jim Hlavac

June 14th, 2013

I’ve been having some interesting dealings with American Thinker where Lopez writes — where I have written — where Lopez did a “defense” of me — I told AT that the man is a mush head — they’re avoiding the issue with me — but invite me to write for them — but with “facts” on the sheer lack of facts on gay men — well, I’m working on wrecking their nerves. Lopez is delusional to say the least.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.