Hey Facebook Users…

Rob Tisinai

June 24th, 2013

gradient_equalIn anticipation of the SCOTUS ruling, I made a small improvement to the Equality graphic people are using as a profile pic. We’re gay, we should have more flair. Feel free to steal it.


June 24th, 2013

It would mean associating with a symbol associated more with the HRC then with actual equality. No thanks.


June 24th, 2013

I don’t mean to offend, but simply speaking from the point of view of design, that thing is hideous.

Also, I’m sure many people disagree with the “we’re gay, we should have more flair”… the “should” is inappropriate. Being gay has nothing to do with flair, and neither, for that matter, does marriage equality.

Priya Lynn

June 24th, 2013

I on the other hand think its great.

Lindoro Almaviva

June 25th, 2013

Would you queens get off your high pure bred Arabian horses for one moment and join the fun? And we criticize people for being tight.

As for the HRC connection; I can see that, but that meme took a live of its own and it now belongs to the world.

Can we have a bigger one please?


June 25th, 2013

I like the drab one for the intended purpose – it says “I’m only using this because I have to”. It says I’m pissed off.

This one says “I’m fabulous”. It’s pretty. It’s not an icon one keeps up in protest, it’s one that ya keep around cuz it’s sparkly.

I don’t need sparkly. I don’t need fabulous. (although I am both, on my own time). I do need to marry my husband after 14 years, and I need my government to recognize our relationship. Until then, they can look at the ugly ass “=” sign. Because being unequal isn’t pretty. And it’s definitely not fabulous.

Tell you what – I’ll fly your hot little number when the SCOTUS does what they oughta… :) Keep it up!


June 25th, 2013

I like this rainbow variation.

I’ve always been one for color overload ;)


June 25th, 2013


Eddie Moris

June 25th, 2013

Love it and will use it. Thanks.

Richard Rush

June 25th, 2013

The significance of Rob’s revised design is that it communicates more information to a (hopefully) wider audience while remaining simple. (But, personally, I would consider changing the red background to a neutral color.)

For years we’ve seen HRC’s “equal” logo on car bumpers, for example. But it only served as a private inside communication among gay people – kind of like the old handkerchief-code among gay men. I don’t think the general population had (or has) a clue. Perhaps the logo was intentionally “closeted.”

So, Rob’s improvement is a more “out” graphic that should spontaneously register with many more people.

Good job, Rob.

Priya Lynn

June 25th, 2013

Richard wins the thread.


June 25th, 2013

I have spent several hours now analyzing this image from every possible perspective.

Some might say, perhaps rightly, I have overanalyzed it.

My conclusion, and I am resolute about this, is:

Works for me!


June 25th, 2013

I changed my icon last night.

Mens sana

June 25th, 2013

Thank you for the graphic: stolen and saved.

The Lauderdale

June 25th, 2013

Is it so little known? I’ve seen it used very widely in the past year especially, only in blue and yellow instead.

I actually think this rainbow equal sign would be very pretty against a transparent background.


June 26th, 2013

Guess what just went up post-decision, baby…

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.