Christie Slams DOMA Ruling

Jim Burroway

June 27th, 2013

New Jersey GOP Gov. Chris Christie, whose name is often brought up as a potential 2016 presidential contender, blasted yesterday’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling declaring Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional:

“I don’t think the ruling was appropriate. I think it was wrong. They, the Court, without a basis in standing, substituted their own judgment for the judgment of a Republican Congress and a Democratic President. In the Republican Congress in the ’90s and Bill Clinton. I thought that Justice Kennedy’s opinion was, in many respects, incredibly insulting to those people, 340-some members of Congress who voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, and Bill Clinton. He basically said that the only reason to pass that bill was to demean people. That’s heck of a thing to say about Bill Clinton and about the Republican Congress back in the ’90s. And it’s just another example of judicial supremacy, rather than having the government run by the people we actually vote for. So I thought it was a bad decision.

Christie reiterated his vow to again veto a marriage equality bill in New Jersey, insisting instead that the rights of New Jersey LGBT couples be put to a vote.

Jack

June 27th, 2013

HA HA

Another McCain/Romney quasi-pseudo-RINO who is selling out his own supposed beliefs to run for an office he will never win.

He should take back the crocodile tears he shed for Tyler Clementi.

Ben in Oakland

June 27th, 2013

Obviously playing both ends. If marriage passes, it was the people’s will and he isn’t responsible. If it fails, he is vindicated.

I find thins about Christie that I like, but this isn’t one of them.

jpeckjr

June 27th, 2013

No, no, no, Governor! Justice Kennedy didn’t say the only reason to pass that bill was to demean people. Congress said that back when the bill was being debated. It’s in the Congressional Record. This information was cited in the oral arguments in the “Windsor” case back in late May. You just weren’t paying attenion, were you?

And are you really saying that a law, once passed and signed, can never be questioned, revised, repealed? Are you equally as insulted by the Voting Rights Act decision as you are by the DOMA decision? And are you really saying you reject the role of the Supreme Court established in the Constitution of the United States?

If you were President, would you support amending the Constitution to eliminate the judicial branch so it could never, ever again insult Congress and the President by ruling a statute unconstitutional?

Ron

June 27th, 2013

Everyone knows the most important part of any Supreme Court decision is whether anyone gets insulted or not. Constitutionality and the rule of law come after that.

David Roberts

June 27th, 2013

What jpeckjr said.

Russ

June 27th, 2013

What jpeckjr said – rocks!

customartist

June 27th, 2013

The Democratic N.Jersey Congress already did their job. Christie fuckt-it-up.

Trying to get SOMEONE ELSE to fix his fukkup is Just Like trying to get Obama to fix George Bush’s fukkups.

This is a Republican Fukkup – Clear?
It is Recorded History.

Fix it Chris!

Chris Christie fails at blaming others for not fixing HIS OWN fukkups.

Larry

June 27th, 2013

Did he feel the same way about the Supreme Court gutting the Voting Rights Act, that was ALSO passed overwhelmingly by Congress and signed by the President?

Lucrece

June 27th, 2013

I’m tired of being told that these dipshits’ claims are insincere, just mere theater for election season.

Maybe Christie is as prejudiced as his comments seem to suggest. Maybe Rubio and Romney are also heterosexist.

Why do some people keep trying to portrait the issue as if it was impossible for a sizable portion of the population being bigoted? And why does suddenly having a degree or high position mean that your bigotry is just an act? Are people with power suddenly wiser or less hateful?

Steve

June 27th, 2013

But it was ok for him to veto a law that the legislature passed. What a moron.

sebaspace

June 27th, 2013

Bill Clinton welcomed the ruling!!!http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/26/supreme-court-defense-of-marriage-act-ruling_n_3454798.html

Ryan

June 27th, 2013

I can’t believe how short some of these people’s memories are.
“What?! Demean gay people?! But how could that be?! They’re wonderful Republican congressmen!”

Jesus.

Ryan

June 27th, 2013

Sorry, I shouldn’t have implied Christie had a short memory. More like he’s being willfully, transparently obtuse.

Mark F.

June 27th, 2013

Who cares about Christie? Put it on the ballot and it is very likely to pass. I suspect Christie is aware of this. He can be against same sex marriage, but he will accept the will of the people when it passes. Fine.

Andrew

June 27th, 2013

Well, I’m glad Christie cleared something up for us. He really is an anti-gay conservative asshole. I was starting to wonder there for a little while.

Every time I even remotely think about finding examples of GOPers I find palatable, they do me the favor of reminding me why I left the party: the unfortunate combination of duplicitious, stupid, and bigoted. Christie’s statement is really all 3.

Hopefully someone got that on tape. Cuz I’m guessing by the time 2016 rolls around, the country will moved well on, and he’s going to look about as smart and modern as someone railing against the Court’s removal of miscegenation laws. Just put that on a loop and play it in the Northeast and he’s done with any presidential aspirations, because Christie don’t play in the South.

Mark F.

June 27th, 2013

Fuck you, Bill Clinton. But glad you finally came around. That’s worth at least a buck.

jerry

June 27th, 2013

I can’t figure out why the Democrats can’t find a really good candidate for the governor’s race and throw this fat bastard into the gutter. Then watch the Republicans swoon over him.

Mark F.

June 28th, 2013

jerry, he’s very popular in NJ, like it or not. He would be really hard to defeat even with a good candidate. And his anti-gay stance will ultimately make no difference.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today in History, 1610: Virginia Colony Enacts North America's First Sodomy Statute

Today In History, 1983: Pat Buchanan Says AIDS Is Nature's "Awful Retribution"

Today In History, 1988: Britain Enacts Section 28

Padres Finally Respond to Gay Men's Chorus Debacle

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1920: Harvard Establishes Secret Court To Investigate "This Pernicious Scourge"

Today In History, 1975: LAPD Chief Declines Gay Pride Invite, Proposes "Gay Conversion Week" Instead

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.