Dear Prop 8 Proponents, it’s over

Timothy Kincaid

August 14th, 2013

The California State Supreme Court has spoken and Proposition 8 has gasped its last. The ridiculous claims about the ruling only impacting two couples, or two counties, or only those county clerks who don’t have their head up their butt, have all finally been given the respect they deserve: (LA Times)

The California Supreme Court refused Wednesday to revive Proposition 8, ending the last remaining legal challenge to same-sex marriage in the state.

Meeting in closed session, the state high court rejected arguments by ProtectMarriage, Proposition 8’s sponsors, that only an appellate court could overturn a statewide law.

TomTallis

August 14th, 2013

The CASC decision was unanimous.

iDavid

August 14th, 2013

I love Love LOVE the fact prop 8 was dismantled derailed demolished and drop kicked to the eternal dust bin of antiquity, single handedly, BY ONE GAY MALE IN A LONG BLACK ROBE. The whiplash to the opponents debilitating, the irony overwhelming.
NOM ET.AL are certainly donning a metaphorical neck brace after that near fatal accident.

Could their be a more embarrassing faux pas than a simple pink Prius nudging a 14 wheel NOMobile-semi clean off a California cliff? Doubt it. A first and a last most likely.

Oh the Hollywood drama of California. Judge Vaughn is certainly Oscar worthy.

Keep the movies com’in boyz, that one was a real doozie.

Sir Andrew

August 15th, 2013

This isn’t over, of course. You know the media monkeys at NOM and the Prop 8 kids are gathered together even now trying to come up with yet another specious legal argument as they continue to roll the dice in the hope that something will stick (I think that’s a mixed metaphor, but it seemed apt). The attorneys helping them with these challenges need to be punished for filing frivolous lawsuits. And for tying up the courts with their idiocy. And for being air breathers. These are the sorts of attorneys that make lawyer jokes seem more like documentary commentary than actual humor.

Stephen

August 15th, 2013

Are comments here being deleted as well?

TampaZeke

August 15th, 2013

I hear they’re planning on appealing to the SCOV, (Supreme Court of the Vatican).

james

August 15th, 2013

(sarcasm alert) “Dear supporters of traditional marriage, We continue to have major victories in courtroom after courtroom in our quest to prevent gay marriage from ever happening anywhere in the United States. Just this week, the California Supreme Court decided we could come back anytime with new arguments against this threat not only to traditional marriage, but to the very existence of our planet! A more serious threat than any the planet has faced ever in its entire history! We know you want to support us with your generous donation of $1000, $500, or $100. With these funds, we will continue to create out of nothing argument after argument to take to court after court after court. Do not listen to our opponents who are saying we are nothing but a bunch of losers! Would a bunch of losers figure out how to make this issue an ongoing cash machine even after we keep losing? Of course not! Only winners could come up with this kind of scheme. Give today, and, no matter what any court, legislature, or majority of voters may say, you will be a winner, too!” (sarcasm ends)

Priya Lynn

August 15th, 2013

Idavid and James – very entertaining comments.

Timothy Kincaid

August 15th, 2013

Stephen,

No, we are not limiting comments on this thread.

The only time comments are deleted are if they are in violation of our Comments Policy or if we say in advance that we are limiting comments (as I did recently on another thread). The latter situation rarely occurs, but we do from time to time choose to limit comments in some way.

Occasionally a commenter will be disruptive or establish a pattern of violation of our Comments Policy and will be placed on moderation for a while. Fortunately this is not very common and if we see that subsequent comments are within policy we usually lift the moderation.

We appreciate the sense of ownership in the blogsite that regular commenters have, and hope that continues. And I know that some feel that the Comments Policy or the administration of the blog is not the way they would run it. But it is – after all – a blogsite and the authors do get some privilege in those decision.

I hope that clears up any confusion about the matter.

Matt

August 16th, 2013

I imagine the mindset of the proponents is probably something along the lines of this right about now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8lT1o0sDwI

james

August 16th, 2013

Thank you, Priya Lynn. I certainly expect they will issue a fundraising appeal at some point based on the idea that if you don’t give now, we can’t keep up the fight. I just wanted to, um, help them out with the language.

iDavid

August 17th, 2013

Matt and James,
Very very funny.

Priya Lynn,
Glad you liked it. :)

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Emphasis Mine

Born On This Day, 1918: Leonard Bernstein

Texas Leads A Five-State Lawsuit Over Obamacare Transgender Rules

Wikileaks Outs Saudi Gay Men, Male Rape Victims, People With HIV

Is Australia's Marriage Equality Plebiscite Doomed?

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1970: New York Times Looks At "Homosexuals In Revolt"

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.