To Eat Science’s Heart Out

Jim Burroway

September 1st, 2013

I don’t take enough vacations. I don’t drop out nearly enough and do nothing but read. I’m doing that this weekend, and nothing else. Before Returning to Jung’s “Answer to Job” at poolside this morning, I caught this at Kenyon Review by Amit Majmudar, which I find very relevant: if religion seeks to provide answers to the deeper meaning in life, why are writers fond of invoking a different authority, the authority of science, to make their arguments?

Now the natural conclusion we might draw from this—and I myself jumped to it—is that the sciences, enjoying the highest prestige in their long history, have become the true authority. Religions are desperate to corroborate their findings with the true Authority. The man in the saffron shawl, the man in the black cassock all look to the man in the white coat. This is why they appropriate the jargon and discoveries of science, drawing analogies whenever they can: As they once cited scripture, now they cite scientific studies. If poetry had the same authority as science, religious thinkers would be desperate to prove the Bible was a work of poetry, even though it’s in prose. (That would be an easier task than proving its assertions about the physical world.) So: Science is in the ascendant, and the relentless appeal to scientific authority proves the bankruptcy of traditional religions and the undermining of their scriptures. Right?

Right, but that’s not the whole story. We haven’t gone far enough. There is a larger phenomenon at work here, one with long precedent in the history of religion.

In some warrior cultures, the victor would remove and eat the heart of the slain enemy. The enemy’s prowess would enter the victor. It was ascendancy through incorporation.

Rick

September 1st, 2013

???

Hyhybt

September 1st, 2013

First, I hope you enjoyed your weekend of reading and don’t even see this comment until at least Tuesday.

Second, just because somebody has to say it: *some* of the Bible IS poetry.

Russ

September 1st, 2013

Majmudar’s reasoning is a bit glib, but even if one accepts his logic, Jim, the title of your post seems to be backwards. Look at the last sentence you quoted, about “ascendency through incorporation.” The victor, it would seem, from all that came before in the quotation is Science. Therefore, it’s not Science’s heart that is being eaten by a victorious warrior, is it?

I’m just not sure you have completely digested Majmudar’s train of thought here – but since you end the quotation so abruptly there, I can’t tell where he was going with that idea. You may want to re-read the passage and clarify it in your own mind.

Jim Burroway

September 2nd, 2013

. My comment (and headline) pertained to the apparent motivation behind some religious factions who in reality have no more regard for science aside from its occasional usefulness when it can be exploited for a cause (in our case, the example of religious figures misappropriating social science for anti-LGBT positions.) I’ve always found that tendency fascinating.

I do think it is pertinent that Amit Majmuda does not claim that religions are necessarily informed by science or any other authority it turns to. Only that elements of those other systems are incorporated in a way to, in essence, bolster more or less what’s already there:

Religion’s absorptive, syncretic tendencies are busy appropriating scientific ideas (and twisting them to fit). The jargon of academic historical research, the jargon of theoretical physics—everything, if the past is any indicator, can and will be repurposed.

Timothy Kincaid

September 2nd, 2013

Without question, some of those within religion who feel a need that their teachings reflect natural reality will increasingly seek to prove that their scripture or their text aligns with science and controlled observation. Though a bit in reverse (“nature agrees with my teaching”), that is probably the impetus behind the Catholic Church’s centuries-old Natural Law. And it is likely part of the current noetic research.

But there are many others who approach religion as separate and other from the natural world and don’t seek to force them into alignment. And the desire by the former group to make their texts observably true will only deepen the divide between the two.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.