October 8th, 2013
Sometimes you read something wrong. Then you read it again wrong. Then you get all indignant and snarky and write a commentary.
And then someone points out that you read it wrong and you feel kinda stupid.
This is one of those times.
Sorry, folks, no story here.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Sandhorse
October 8th, 2013
Ok, first of all, I hope your suspicions are incorrect. I would hate to see my home town exhibiting such disregard for our community. Pittsburgh is a nice part of the state and was recently listed as one of the Top 10 cities to live in. Life has taken me across state but if I had the chance, I would be back in a heart beat.
Secondly, Timothy, I think there may be something wrong with your quote. “Officers said they do know who they are looking for.â€
If the “n’t†was deliberately left off the fourth word in that sentence; then it’s time to quit being just suspicious and start asking the ‘burghs’ commissioner questions.
Timothy Kincaid
October 8th, 2013
Sandhorse, every time I read that my brain provided a “not” between “do” and “know”.
Thanks, brain.
TampaZeke
October 8th, 2013
I for one appreciate the fact that you owned your mistake and didn’t simply wipe it from the record. Too many people on the web and on television lack that integrity.
Sandhorse
October 8th, 2013
Well, in your defense Timothy, the line itself was grammatically cumbersome.
“Officers said they know who they are looking for.†Would have been a ‘more clearer’, and ‘much lesser’ verbose, way to state that fact. ;)
But I guess if the writer was getting paid by the letter…
Leave A Comment