November 11th, 2013
Darn that Pope Francis, he’s at it again!! Trying to cause trouble for the American Bishops and other lovers of theocracy and autocratic doctrine.
Earlier this year he stuck his nose in the fine running machine of Catholic hierarchy and caused a big stink by suggesting that the Church’s sole purpose actually wasn’t to oppose gay marriage, contraception, and abortion. As if he really didn’t know that these three issues are the single most important concerns to the lay Catholics who go to sleep at night and wake up in the morning terrified that through these evils the population may have shrunk overnight to an unsustainable low.
And now he’s gone off the deep end. His representative to the American Catholic Bishops suggested that Bishops not live lives of opulence and privilege. Come on!! They aren’t called ‘Princes of the Church’ for nothing, you know.
And then (oh the temerity), he said that the church should be pastoral and ministerial rather than dictatorial and dogmatic. (Star-Telegram)
The Vatican ambassador to the U.S., addressing American bishops at their first national meeting since Pope Francis was elected, said Monday they should not “follow a particular ideology” and should make Roman Catholics feel more welcome in church.
Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano noted the challenges from broader society to Christian teaching. He cautioned that the bishops’ witness to faith would be undermined if they failed to live simply. Francis, in office for eight months, has captured attention for eschewing some of the pomp of the papacy, including his decision to live in the Vatican hotel and his use of an economy car.
“There has to be a noticeable lifestyle characterized by simplicity and holiness of life. This is a sure way to bring our people to an awareness of the truth of our message,” said Vigano, the apostolic nuncio based in Washington.
“The Holy Father wants bishops in tune with their people,” Vigano said, noting that he visited the pope in June. “He made a special point of saying that he wants pastoral bishops, not bishops who profess or follow a particular ideology.”
Just who does this guy think he is, anyway?
But don’t be discouraged or lose hope. The American Bishops are well skilled at creative postulation and I’m certain they will find a way to make the statement become an endorsement of their latest extremely important anti-gay campaign and truly necessary ten-digit shoe budget.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
gar
November 11th, 2013
Wow. He not only looks like George Smiley, but he acts like him, too. Sly, subtle guy, Pope Francis.
Hyhybt
November 11th, 2013
Ten digits sounds right for a pair of shoes. At least, that’s how many are on my feet.
Lindoro Almaviva
November 11th, 2013
Just who does this guy think he is, anyway?
Next you gonna tell me he’s the pope or something
Lord_Byron
November 12th, 2013
Sorry, but for me no matter how nice he acts he is still head of an organization that is doing damage around the world. If he were to order all secret documents pertaining to the decades, at least, of molestation to be handed over the governments of the world then I could start to believe he wants to change anything. Otherwise all he is doing is putting a nice face on horrible ideas.
Hunter
November 12th, 2013
I don’t expect Francis to be able to make any substantial changes in the attitudes and public positions of the American bishops — there’s a lot of inertia to overcome (like four popes worth), and the Church is not noted for moving swiftly (unless it’s to protect its own privilege).
That said, to even voice comments like this is a radical move, and perhaps more subtle than we expect — as widely reported as anything any pope says is, he’s going to create a marked contrast between the “official” direction of the Church and the American bishops. (And no doubt any number of African bishops as well.)
One thing that’s going to be important is Francis’ appointments — the last four popes spent a fair amount of energy filling the Curia with rock-hard conservatives, and it’s going to take a lot of erosion before their influence is neutralized.
As it stands, I’m still surprised he was elected — I’d guess that enough of the Curia are aware that the Church has a serious problem, both in image and substance, that maybe Francis’ new direction is not such an uphill climb.
As it is, his continued emphasis on humility and pastoral care is going to, eventually, marginalize Dolan, George, Cordileone, et al. — they can’t openly oppose him, but they’ve got a lot invested in the status quo and they’re not going to fall in line very quickly. A major stumbling block is that Benedict is still around, and while I doubt he’s calling the shots, he’s still very influential. (A guess — Vatican politics are still in the Renaissance, which is to say murky beyond comprehension.)
Rick Hopkins
November 12th, 2013
Wow, if this keeps up I may actually go back to church!
Timothy Kincaid
November 12th, 2013
Thanks hyhybt, that made my morning. Though, in truth, I meant to type 5-digit, as in the 10s of thousands. My subconscious must have taken over.
William E Buehner
November 12th, 2013
Kinkaid, you, sir, are a real jerk! How dare you assume you know the hearts of all Roman Catholics. You are a narrow minded “hater” and you really should not have any following…well, no following of thinking people.
Paul Douglas
November 12th, 2013
Billy Buehner:
I’d go tell you to suck on a lemon but I can tell you already have. What a bitter old soul. Probably a member of Opus Dei, the K of C or the Blue Army.
Get a life.
Ray
November 12th, 2013
Francis is oppressing the bishops and priests.
Nathaniel
November 14th, 2013
Hunter, you reminded me of something one of my professors said just before Benedict’s election. He predicted that they would elect a Pope more conservative than JPII, then follow him up with someone way more liberal. This may very well be part of someone’s long-term plan to improve the church’s image, kind of like what the conspiracy theorists say about New Coke.
Leave A Comment