3 responses

  1. RussTX
    December 3, 2013

    The “brilliance of the argument”? Hardly. More like a Three Stooges argument – the lawyers are just playing with words, because they know they have no case. Better to admit defeat and work honestly for SSM in parliament than play such a stupid game with the court.

  2. Dave H
    December 3, 2013

    It’s a clever and creative ploy, but I think the consequences will be exactly the opposite of what they want.

    If they are successful in creating a separate legal definition called “same-sex marriage,” there are currently no laws on the books (I would imagine) that make any mention of or grant any rights to those in “same-sex marriages.” It’s an empty shell.

  3. Paul Douglas
    December 4, 2013

    Whether it works or not, its just more water dripping against the stone of patriarchy. Eventually it will crack and erode.
    Drip, drip, drip, drip…. .

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

Back to top
mobile desktop