December 20th, 2013
They keep coming down to county building. #samesexmarriage #utah @fox13now pic.twitter.com/LOhjlJaKsd
— Annie Cutler (@annie_cutler) December 20, 2013
The Utah Attorney General’s office says that it will seek an emergency stay against the ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Robert J. Shelby finding the state’s ban on same sex marriage unconstitutional. The AG office issued this brief statement:
The federal district court’s ruling that same-sex marriage is a fundamental right has never been established in any previous case in the 10th Circuit. The state is requesting an emergency stay pending the filing of an appeal. The Attorney General’s Office will continue reviewing the ruling in detail until an appeal is filed to support the constitutional amendment passed by the citizens of Utah.
Gov. Gary Herbert (R) has also issued a brief statement:
“I am very disappointed an activist federal judge is attempting to override the will of the people of Utah. I am working with my legal counsel and the acting Attorney General to determine the best course to defend traditional marriage within the borders of Utah.”
ABC news reports that “dozens” had already lined up at the Salt Lake County clerk’s office, including State Sen. Jim Dabakis and his longtime partner, Stephen Justesen. Salt Lake City mayor Ralph Becker is on hand to officiate:
Mayor Becker marrying Senator Jim Dubakis and his now husband. #slc pic.twitter.com/JXmksTu8oE
— Seth Anderson (@jsethanderson) December 20, 2013
The LDS has reacted to the ruling:
Cody Craynor, a spokesman for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, released the following statement in response to the ruling.
“The Church has been consistent in its support of traditional marriage while teaching that all people should be treated with respect. This ruling by a district court will work its way through the judicial process. We continue to believe that voters in Utah did the right thing by providing clear direction in the state constitution that marriage should be between a man and a woman and we are hopeful that this view will be validated by a higher court.”
Update: Equality on Trial says that the state has appealed the judge’s decision to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals:
The state defendants in the challenge to Utah’s same-sex marriage ban have filed an appeal of today’s decision striking down the ban. Earlier today, a federal district court ruled that the ban is unconstitutional. There is not yet an application for a stay of the district court decision…
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Timothy Kincaid
December 20th, 2013
Judge Shelby issued a summary judgment. This pretty much means that he finds the defendants of the law have no merit to their argument. He may not issue the stay.
cowboy
December 20th, 2013
First Surprise: This announcement came on a Friday afternoon before a holiday. Was it by design? It will likely take until January 4th before anything is done about the stay. And nobody wants to be a Scrooge at this time of year.
Second Surprise: And it is pleasant. To see Salt Lake City Mayor Becker officiating at Jim’s and Stephen’s wedding. My heartiest congratulations to the couple. And who or what would dare undo this ritual. It would be categorized as pure hate to take away this civil right from all these couples.
Third Surprise: Why would any person not think this amendment wasn’t unconstitutional.
But, I remember my Senator Orrin Hatch saying the only way to stop same-sex marriage would be with a federal amendment to the Constitution. And that’s not likely.
I will relish this day for a long time. And Utah will be a part of this historical event and same-sex marriages will be a political non-issue in 2016 because it will be moot.
Plaintom
December 21st, 2013
Surely the religious right wouldn’t want the judge to work during the Christmas Holidays. :)
Hunter
December 21st, 2013
And of course, the AG’s statement misrepresents the opinion. Judge Shelby was quite plain in saying that the state has no right to exclude gay couples from marriage, which is a fundamental right, not, as the AG claims, that there is a constitutional right to “same-sex marriage.” (The opinion addresses that question beginning on p. 27.)
Timothy Kincaid: Judge Shelby demolished the state’s arguments, brick by brick. It’s really a joy to read.
Priya Lynn
December 21st, 2013
Hunter, do you have a link to the ruling?
Nathaniel
December 24th, 2013
Hunter, great point! I almost missed it! That subtle twisting of words from ‘a fundamental right to marriage regardless of the sex of your would-be spouse’ to ‘a fundamental right to same-sex marriage.’ Verbally, only slightly different, but worlds apart in meaning. Shelby didn’t determine the latter, but rather upheld the former as a previously determined right!
Leave A Comment