6 responses

  1. revchicoucc
    December 24, 2013

    I’m pragmatic enough to think several of the 10th Circuit judges took some vacation time for Christmas so they decided to wait. Of course, if they thought it was an “emergency,” as Utah officials want them to think, they’d find a way to issue a stay. I, too, hope they refuse the stay.

    A clergy colleague friend of mine was married to his long-time partner in Ogden on Monday, then stayed at the courthouse to officiate for other couples.

  2. cowboy
    December 24, 2013

    They did refuse the stay.

  3. cowboy
    December 24, 2013
  4. Hyhybt
    December 24, 2013

    This bodes well for permanence.

  5. Hunter
    December 25, 2013

    I realize that we can’t take this as an indicator of the 10th Circuit’s final decision, but one of the reasons for refusing a stay is that the appellant is not likely to prevail at trial.

  6. Mark F.
    December 25, 2013

    I would say there is some likelihood of winning the appeal, as SCOTUS has not decided there is a right to same sex marriage as of now, and “Baker” still stands as precedent. So I expect an eventual stay.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

Back to top
mobile desktop