2 responses

  1. Hyhybt
    March 26, 2014

    As with Utah, it seems to me that the state’s not recognizing them until the stay is lifted would be technically correct. The gist of the back-in-effect provision is that they don’t recognize *anybody’s* marriage unless it’s between opposite sexes, regardless of where the wedding took place.

    (And no, saying that doesn’t mean I *like* it.)

  2. MattNYC
    March 26, 2014

    I am surprised that Snyder has a single second to devote to something other than selling off pieces of his state to the lowest politically-connected bidder.

Leave a Reply




Back to top
mobile desktop