Radical Militant Activist Judge Jones

Timothy Kincaid

May 20th, 2014

Anti-gay activists like to pretend that the only way marriage equality is obtained is through the machinations of radical militant activist judges who impose their leftist agenda against the will of the people. So it’s always nice to know a little about who these judges are and how they came to hold their position.

Judge John E. Jones III, whose ruling found that Pennsylvania’s ban on same-sex marriage (legislative, not a constitutional amendment) is in violation of the US Constitution, is a bit hard to sell as a radical militant activist with a leftist agenda. But he’s certainly had that accusation thrown at him before, when he found that intelligent design could not be part of a school curriculum.

Before Jones became a jurist, re ran for Congress for the Sixth Congressional District seat and then, when unsuccessful, was co-chair of the transition team for Governor-elect Tom Ridge. He considered a run for Governor in 2001. As a Republican.

Jones was appointed by President George W. Bush as federal judge on the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in February 2002 and was unanimously confirmed by the United States Senate on July 30, 2002.

Ben In Oakland

May 20th, 2014

Don’t leave out that his nomination was roundly praised by Little ricky Santorum, who knows a thing or two.

But only one thing. Or possibly two.


May 20th, 2014


Pennsylvania Republican Chairman Rob Gleason decried the ruling.

“Today, an activist judiciary has substituted its judgment in place of the law created by the elected representatives of Pennsylvania and has stifled the ongoing debate of people with differing points of view,” Gleason said.

Chris McCoy

May 20th, 2014

Sometimes I wonder if Conservatives understand what the Judicial Branch does, and why it exists. Do they not teach Article Three of the Constitution anymore?

I have come to learn that “activist judge” has the meaning “A judge who ruled against the way I wanted.”

Someone should ask Gleason, in public, if Brown stifled the ongoing debate of people with differing points of view.


May 21st, 2014

We all need to learn that there are no thoughtful discussions any more. Politics and public policy are simply competing memes intended to bolster one’s base by telling them what they already believe. For every action you can hear the click and hiss of the required pre-taped response. It is intended to plug that hole of doubt that opens up briefly in the minds of the listener with a cork to make sure no new thoughts enter. This is not discourse and it advances nothing… the pointless dance of political balkanization.


May 21st, 2014

Why is it that only liberals, or perceived liberals, get labelled as activist judges? Conservative judges these days have certainly done a lot to advance conservative causes. Being an activist does not connote one’s place on the political spectrum.

Paul Douglas

May 21st, 2014

If anyone is an activist judge its His Portliness Scalia or Uncle Clarence. Now those two are activist judges!


May 21st, 2014

Seemingly the only way the next GOP president will be able to guarantee ‘strict constructionist’, non-activist judges is by naturalizing Saudi Arabian clerics and appointing them to the federal bench.

Chris McCoy

May 21st, 2014

John wrote:

Why is it that only liberals, or perceived liberals, get labelled as activist judges?

Because the Liberals who would be upset over the rulings of Conservative Judges know that judicial action is not “activism”. I have never heard of a liberal using the “activist judge” allegation before.

Even while many liberals decried and disagreed with the Supreme Court ruling against Affirmative Action in Minnesota, I did not see any liberals accuse the SCOTUS of judicial activism.


May 22nd, 2014

I’ve seen some progressives refer to Citizens United and Kelo as “judicial activism”, but it’s not very common (and people of all political stripes used it with regard to Kelo, which appeared to anger everyone with strong political beliefs of any sort).

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.