October 6th, 2014
Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, calls today’s Supreme Court action “a vindication of Antonin Scalia,” whose angry dissents in Lawrence v. Texas and Windsor v. US warned that this day would come. And that leaves Mohler feeling a bit down:
As of last week, 19 states and the District of Columbia had legalized same-sex marriage by one means or another. The Court’s decision not to take one of the cases from the lower Federal courts means that every one of them stands. Therefore, not only will same-sex marriage be legal in the states that made a direct appeal, but in every state included within the same U.S. Circuit.
That result is that the decision made clear by the Court will lead, automatically, to the fact that 30 states will have legal same-sex marriage within weeks, if not days. The news from the Court means that the vast majority of Americans will live where same-sex marriage is legal, and three fifths of the states will have legalized same-sex marriage.
But the Court’s decision also sent another even more powerful message. The remaining federal courts were put on notice that same-sex marriage is now the expectation of the Supreme Court and that no appeal on the question is likely to be successful, or even heard. You can expect the lower courts to hear that message loudly and clearly — and fast.
This day in U.S. legal history will be remembered for many years to come as a landmark day toward same-sex marriage. It was the day the nation’s highest court took one of the lowest paths of least resistance. It now seeks to maintain its prestige by avoiding the backlash the Court experienced in the aftermath of Roe v. Wade in 1973. It wants to have its victory without taking further risks to its reputation.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Jim Hlavac
October 6th, 2014
Why is liberty to pursue happiness as we see fit so awful to these many? Not in 45 years of listening to heterosexuals can I get a clear answer beyond “well, I wouldn’t do that, gross” — well, so be it — but really — if you think this is some shake society to its knees thing then you are positing the idea that gay men are the very lynchpin of society — if we are trashed and agree to trash ourselves too, then society survives — and if a nice word is said, especially by heteros, the whole of civilization will collapse – well, I know we’re just wonderful — but we just can’t be that important.
Poor man, I hope he sleeps well tonight, or his wife will put up with his blubbering.
LJ
October 6th, 2014
So _that_ explains the lamentation I was hearing up here in Indiana, drifting north over the Ohio River…
Ben in oakland
October 6th, 2014
Jim, we are that important. don’t you know we cause hurricanes, civilizations to fall, and hemorrhoids?
LJ
October 6th, 2014
Ben, don’t forget the tornados and terrorist attacks!
John
October 6th, 2014
“Rejoice in the Lord always, again I say ‘REJOICE’!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Rkv-h-uttME
I’m pretty happy!
CPT_Doom
October 6th, 2014
I don’t what is most ironic: that Scalia’s greatest legacy as a Supreme Court Justice will be his bitter anti-gay dissents; that Mohler may well be correct that pending decisions in the 5th and 6th Circuits will be heavily influenced by today’s action; or that Mr Mohler’s own marriage is not considered religiously valid by his Roman Catholic political allies, yet he has no problem trampling on their religious rights and making them recognize it for legal purposes.
Gus
October 7th, 2014
The backlash against Roe is only possible because states regulate medical procedures/clinics/hospitals and the Supremes said the states could regulate abortion trimesters. Don’t see how this translates to marriage equality.
Timothy Kincaid
October 7th, 2014
Cpt Doom,
Perhaps the most delicious irony is that when they quote the Supreme Court on matters of marriage in the future, it will be using the language of his anti-gay rants as the logic for overturning bans. I suspect that in the future, many will mistakenly think Scalia was the voice calling for inclusion.
Paul Douglas
October 7th, 2014
“Reverend” Mohler:
“Mixing politics and religion is like mixing manure and ice cream. It doesn’t do much to the manure but it surely does ruin the ice cream”.
Will Rogers
Regan DuCasse
October 7th, 2014
Roe v Wade persists, not because of it’s timing, but because it’s about the sacrifice of an infant’s life. That will always have intractable concerns for most people.
The issue of marriage equality is more in line with the decision about contraception and the Pill and Loving vs. VA.
And there were several precedents in the lower courts concerning women’s rights within marriage.
Many of these precedents have been cited in the lower courts and also the defenses against contraception and women’s marital autonomy is similar to the defenses against marriage equality.
In other words, the historical and social contexts for gay citizens is now MUCH more clear and the lower courts have provided exceptional references in that regard. They hadn’t been available until about a decade ago and since.
All of the stays, amicus briefs, interventions and other defenses of the marriage bans, became more about the stalling in and of itself, instead of actually intervening on behalf of marriage or society itself from any damaging effects of marriage equality.
This is what gave SCOTUS more fuel to punt (again).
But any of us paying attention to the entire of the legal processes from state to state, see how the lower courts made their cases very difficult for SCOTUS to rule in their favor.
NONE of the defenses of the marriage bans, as I’ve mentioned before, adds up to being legal or Constitutional on any level.
Even NOM and their cohorts using majority rule and the popular vote. There is protection for minorities from tyranny by a majority too.
And the opposition cannot argue that gays are not a minority, or that their treatment in this country up until recently wasn’t tyrannical.
Priya Lynn
October 7th, 2014
“Roe v Wade persists, not because of it’s timing, but because it’s about the sacrifice of an infant’s life. That will always have intractable concerns for most people.”.
Right. Despite anti-gay bigots desperately hoping it will be so, there’s no way a large percentage of Americans are going to get anywhere near as worked up about gays marrying as they are about fetuses being killed.
Timothy Kincaid
October 7th, 2014
I agree.
Leave A Comment