More former ex-gay leader support ban on reparative therapy for minors

Timothy Kincaid

April 10th, 2015

So it appears that there is something called Former Ex-Gay Leaders Alliance (FELA) which is comprised of (not surprisingly) former ex-gay leaders. FELA has issued a statement in support of the Obama Administration’s opposition to reparative therapy for minors.

Banning reparative therapy for minors from licensed clinical mental health professionals assures young people can find solace and solidarity in the scientific community, while holding mental health workers accountable. It does not limit them, or their parents, from seeking spiritual advice from clergy. It does however, send a clear message that the practice of sexual orientation change efforts does not work, and should alert and alarm guardians of its potentially dangerous, or even deadly, effects.

As one would never send a patient to a doctor to perform unethical, unnecessary, and outdated medicine, it is time to hold mental health practitioners to similar standards. We welcome President Obama’s statement and stand with him in opposition to reparative therapy for minors, and call on everyone, regardless of political affiliation, to stand with us and put an end, once and for all, to this practice.

Signatories incuded

Brad Allen – Exodus International
Darlene Bogle – Paraklete Ministries
Michael Bussee – Exodus International
Catherine Chapman – Portland Fellowship
Jeremy Marks – Courage UK, Exodus Europe
John Paulk – Love Won Out, Exodus International
Bill Prickett – Coming Back
Tim Rymel – Love in Action
Yvette Cantu Schneider – Exodus International, Family Research Council
John J. Smid – Love In Action, Exodus International
Randy Thomas – Exodus International
Michael D. Watt – Love in Action
Kevin White – Exodus Books

Yesterday Alan Chambers, former President of Exodus International, gave his support to the Administration’s position.

Paul Douglas

April 10th, 2015

Good for them!

Richard Rush

April 11th, 2015

They are making significant progress toward atoning for their past errors, and while I respect them for that, they are not quite there yet.

Their statement includes, “It does not limit them, or their parents, from seeking spiritual advice from clergy.” The only parents who are likely to send a child to clergy for “spiritual advice” are those who attend anti-gay churches, and that could be as bad or worse than sending a child to a licensed “professional” promoting reparative therapy. Given our society’s wholly unwarranted level of respect and deference granted to religion, the banning of this abusive practice appears highly unlikely anytime soon.

Eric Payne

April 12th, 2015

Publicity whores, all of them.

Whatever happened to the shamed sitting in silence?

SharonB

April 13th, 2015

The world turned upside down!
(In a good way.)

JohnAGJ

April 13th, 2015

I’d rather have them voice support for banning this practice than shame them into silence, Eric. Now if they came out opposing the ban that would be a different matter entirely…

Priya Lynn

April 13th, 2015

I’m with you John.

Eric Payne

April 13th, 2015

Look at what they say — they;re not opposed to parents using the clergy to offer spiritual advice.

So they just don’t want the shrinks getting into a kid’s head, but if it’s God, hey, it’s cool with them.

They’re a bunch of pathetic sphincters who should have the good graces to sit in silence.

Jason

April 13th, 2015

It’s great seeing they’ve redeemed themselves.I commend them all.

Chris

April 13th, 2015

yet another blow to the ex-gay myth hopefully one day it’ll just fade away in the future

Eric in Oakland

April 14th, 2015

“It does not limit them, or their parents, from seeking spiritual advice from clergy.”

Eric and Richard, I don’t understand your objection to the inclusion of this statement. It isn’t advocating anything, but simply stating a fact. The point of including it is to counter the argument that these bans would limit religious freedom, which is untrue.

Eric Payne

April 14th, 2015

Eric in Oakland,

The reason I object? It’s simple — the very idea of reparative therapy began in the Church. Priests, pastors and Rabbis who would spiritually berate gays and lesbians as being unclean sinners damned to hell and to be shunned by all unless they repented and prayed to God to cure them of their unnatural desires.

As was pointed out… if parents believe their child is in need (or if the gay person, child or adult has that belief) of “spiritual counseling,” then they are probably members of a church/congregation who still hold to an “unsure sinner” belief of gays, and the terrorization of that gay person continues.

It’s tantamount to Chambers saying: “Hey, ‘pray-away-the-gay’ didn’t work for me. And I’m certain it doesn’t work at all. But it might work for someone else; it could have been my faith just wasn’t strong enough.”

Priya Lynn

April 14th, 2015

“It does not limit them, or their parents, from seeking spiritual advice from clergy.”

Eric and Richard, I don’t understand your objection to the inclusion of this statement”.

Because it takes no position on that action, showing neutrality instead of condemning it as the evil it is.

Timothy Kincaid

April 14th, 2015

Eric Payne,

No, the very idea of reparative therapy did not begin in church.

Psychotherapy originated in the secular world and was held with high suspicion by the religious world for a very long time. Regular readers of BTB are very familiar with Jim’s reporting of all sort of historical efforts and implements for “curing” those with such urges. These were secular, not religious, efforts.

And the words you are putting in Alan’s mouth are very different from the words I hear him actually saying.

Eric Payne

April 14th, 2015

And, Timothy, we’re each entitled to our observations concerning the Chambers’ comments. But there’s a reason he provided himself with an “out” in his statement.

As for reparative therapy being wholly secular. While it’s true the Church didn’t create thos therapies, the Church and religious teachings is what provided the developers of modern-day “therapies” with the idea change was possible through… that those therapists changed the route of “change” from prayer and repentance to physical and psychological torture doesn’t matter.

Timothy Kincaid

April 14th, 2015

No, Eric, I don’t think you are correct.

For a very long time, homosexuality was seen by the church as merely behavior. There was nothing to “change” about a person, per se, they simply needed to resist temptation.

The idea that a person was actually uniquely attracted to the same sex – and thus that there was some aspect to them that could be subject to change – was wholly secular. As were the therapies.

Eric Payne

April 14th, 2015

And the same holds true for the secular viewpoint — those who engaged in homosexual activity were making a choice to do so. While that choice may be driven by a psychosis/psychiatric disorder, it is still the behavior they attempt to change.

I repeat myself concerning these “ex- ex-gay” spokespeople: They are addicted to the attention and publicity they’re used to receiving. I firmly believe most of them believe their failure to change is completely their fault — they failed in their faith and, so, God did not relieve them of their “Same Sex Attraction Disorder” (btw: that phrase was coined by religious leaders, not secular psychiatrists). So, while they now believe such change is impossible… for themselves… it might not be for someone else, so they’re not against “spiritual counseling.”

We see this from two different angles from the get-go, Tim. With Chambers, or any other ex-ex-gay who makes public statements that can be viewed as being gay-friendly, or seem to be blatantly gay-positive, you see someone who is attempting to atone for their past transgressions.

I see egotistical narcissists who aren’t getting their fix, and are starving for attention.

They want to make reparations for the harm they caused, and the infliction of pain in which they personally, individually participated? Issue a public apology, fund a scholarship program (anonymously) or open shelters for gay kids discarded by parents (again, anonymously) and just shut up. Give those gay persons who are your contemporaries the chance to forget about you.

Timothy Kincaid

April 14th, 2015

Eric,

You are, of course, entitled to your own opinion about former ex-gays or anyone else.

However, the statements you are making appear to be contradicted by the former ex-gays themselves. None that I know of are saying that “it might work for someone else”.

I think perhaps that you have a different understanding of the term “spiritual counseling” than is commonly used in Christian circles. It seems that you assume that it must include efforts to change orientation. I don’t think that either the former ex-gays nor the others reading at Religion News would have that understanding of the term.

Timothy Kincaid

April 14th, 2015

As for whether they are attention seekers or not, we see differently.

While you want them to disappear, others of us find value in their public opposition to ex-gay efforts and therapy.

But I’m a bit amused that you insist they do a number of things and do them anonymously. For all we know, they may be doing so. Anonymously.

Eric Payne

April 14th, 2015

And if they are, good for them. It’s what they should be doing — penetance and reparation in humbled silence.

Eric Payne

April 14th, 2015

But Timothy, as for whether they’re attention seekers or not…

There’s a big difference between a media person approaching Chambers and asking him for a quote/statement and Chambers approaching a media person/outlet and saying: “I used to be involved in the ex-gay movement (or just relying on name recognition); would you like a comment from me concerning today’s White House statements?”

Certainly, as a news media reporter, you understand that distinction.

ET

April 14th, 2015

In regard to “For a very long time, homosexuality was seen by the church as merely behavior. There was nothing to ‘change’ about a person, per se, they simply needed to resist temptation,” the reality is that for a very long time, the Church has viewed the appetite, inclination and tendency toward homosexual acts as both disordered and different from the behavior of actually engaging in the act. And rather than “there was nothing to change about the person,” the Church has long taught and continues to teach that such inclinations and tendencies are imperfections of the person, and that “the commandment said, ‘You shall not covet,’ in order that, when we find ourselves lying in this diseased state, we might seek the medicine of Grace, and by that commandment know both in what direction our endeavours should aim as we advance in our present mortal condition, and to what a height it is possible to reach in the future immortality. For unless perfection could somewhere be attained, this commandment would never have been given to us.”

Thus, even if perfection (e.g. to be free of disordered tendencies) is ultimately only in “the future immortality”, it nonetheless remains a therapeutic endeavor on earth to “advance in our present mortal condition,” and the “medicine of Grace” and “endeavors” toward perfection (e.g. to be free of disordered tendencies) can certainly be considered forms of “reparative therapy” that long predate Freud. And indeed, “reparative therapy” comes in many different forms, not limited to psychotherapy, including prayer and ministry and just about any religious practice under the sun.

Also, reparative therapy does not require that “a person was actually uniquely attracted to the same sex”, for it’s available for bisexual persons as well, and even for heterosexual persons who have occasional unwanted thoughts.

Timothy Kincaid

April 14th, 2015

Eric,

I understand the above quote to have a different meaning than the one you ascribe to it. Perhaps we have different experiences which yield a different understanding of the particular language of Christianity.

AbnerBh

April 22nd, 2015

[TK – content removed. We do not allow cut-and-paste from other sites.]

AbnerBh

April 22nd, 2015

[TK – content removed. We do not allow cut-and-paste from other sites.]

AbnerBh

April 22nd, 2015

[TK – content removed. We do not allow cut-and-paste from other sites.]

Priya Lynn

April 22nd, 2015

Abner, no one who is completely heterosexual is as obsessed with LGBT people as you. You are obviously a self-loathing gay. Get help and learn to accept yourself as you are – there is nothing wrong with same sex attractions, they are harmless.

Ben in oakland

April 22nd, 2015

Oh, honey, copying and pasting the same stupidity doesn’t maker you smarter…

It makes you stupiderer.

Priya Lynn

April 22nd, 2015

As I recall, Abner was put on moderation for posting such nonsense on previous occasions, he’s now changed his identity so he can post his previously debunked idiocy again.

Richard Rush

April 22nd, 2015

I strongly suspect that AbnerBh (aka Abian, aka Bhattacharya, aka snowisfun, aka funinsnow, aka playinsnow, aka JR Johnson, and aka just plain Abner) is actually Janis Heuberger of Colorado Springs.

Priya Lynn

April 22nd, 2015

What makes you think that Richard?

Abneb

April 22nd, 2015

Again Richard Rush-I’m not Jewish yet you gave me a Jewish name & though I’m not White, I agree with David E. Duke & SOlutrian John H. DeNugent that we need to stop going to wars for Jews such as Iraq (let the Jews fight that out with the Arabs) & Jews control money such as Goldman Sachs.

[TK – content removed. We do not allow cut-and-paste from other sites.]

Priya Lynn

April 22nd, 2015

You’re projecting Abneb, accusing others of the dishonesty in yourself you don’t want to admit. All the evidence shows that gayness is biological in origin, there is no link to childhood sex abuse.

Priya Lynn

April 22nd, 2015

You’re sick abneb, you need to get help. You’re obsession with stirring up hatred of innocent LGBT people is only keeping you from getting well.

IamNOTJewish

April 22nd, 2015

[TK – content removed. We do not allow cut-and-paste from other sites.]

Priya Lynn

April 22nd, 2015

We’ve been though this before abner. What determines a person’s sexual orientation is who they are attracted to, not who they have sex with. Child molesters don’t care about the gender of the child they’re molesting, they are attracted to the lack of secondary sexual characteristics, the smooth hairless skin, etc. and so it doesn’t generally matter to them if their victim is a boy or girl, they are attracted to the feminine smoothness regardless. Heterosexual male child molesters mostly molest boys because they are given access to boys rather than girls. Almost all child molesters are in a heterosexual adult relationship.

You are like the people who genitally mutilate young girls, you want to control what others do with their bodies. People have a right to do whatever they want to their bodies, neither you nor the female genital mutliators have a right to control other people’s bodies

iamnotaJewtore

April 22nd, 2015

[TK – content removed. We do not allow cut-and-paste from other sites.]

Priya Lynn

April 22nd, 2015

Repeating the same lie won’t fool anyone Abner. Everyone knows sexual orientation is determined by who you’re attracted to, not who you have sex with.

All the evidence shows gayness and transgenderims is biological, sexual molestation has nothing to do with it and the vast majority of LGBT people were not molested and the vast majority of people who were molested as children turn out heterosexual.

Priya Lynn

April 22nd, 2015

Get off the internet and get help Abner – you’re sick.

iamnotajew

April 22nd, 2015

[TK – content removed. We do not allow cut-and-paste from other sites.]

Priya Lynn

April 22nd, 2015

Almost all child molesters are males in heterosexual relationships. Gays and transexuals are far less likely to be child molestors than heteroesexual men.

Your desire to murder people who are harming no one is the ultimate evidence of your pathology – get off the internet and get help.

William Fisher

April 22nd, 2015

OK, IamNOTJewish (or whatever you want to call yourself), using your criteria, if Jerry A. Sandusky is a homosexual paedophile, he is also a heterosexual teleiophile. Even if he called himself gay, he would still be straight by behaviour definition. That pattern is, in fact, quite a common one: a man who is heterosexual where adults are concerned but engages in homosexual sex with children.

A UK Home Office report (Sex Offending Against Children: Understanding The Risk, 1998) notes that the sex of the children targeted by abusers “does not appear to reflect, however, sexual orientation towards adults”, and that “Marshall et al. (1988) found, for example, that even in a group of men who had offended exclusively against boys aged five to 10, two thirds had adult heterosexual preferences.” (p. 18) We are not told what the adult sexual preferences of the remaining third were, or even whether they had any at all, but on the next page the Home Office report also cites a 1991 paper on child molesters by the same research team, which refers to “the FEW [emphasis added] who engaged in homosexual behaviour with adults.”

My own experience, although it cannot be statistically significant, is in line with this: the two most persistent sexual offenders against young boys whom I have known have both been heterosexual teleiophiles living a “normal” heterosexual “lifestyle”, i.e. married to women and with children of their own.

Timothy Kincaid

April 22nd, 2015

Can we PLEASE stop feeding the troll?

His cut and paste nonsense is being deleted which leaves a one-sided argument. There’s no point.

Priya Lynn

April 22nd, 2015

Last time he was here Jim put him on moderation, he hasn’t demonstrated any reason why he should have been taken off moderation.

Jim Burroway

April 22nd, 2015

I have put him on moderation again. I had removed several moderation blocks last year when a number of people were complaining that they were getting moderation messages even though they weren’t supposed to be on moderation.

Eric Payne

April 22nd, 2015

Damn.

The Village Idiot must have been here, wearing his “Kick me. Kick me, hard” sign… and because Comcast been wonky all day, I missed it.

Damn. Damn. Damndamndamn.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.