Today In History, 1924: World’s First Known Lesbian Magazine Published

Jim Burroway

August 8th, 2016

Die-Freundin-image-1Die Freundin (The Girlfriend) began publishing in Berlin on August 8, 1924, by the Bund für Menschenrecht (League for Human Rights). The BfM had been established by Friedrich Radszuweit, partly as a gay rights organization and partly as a publishing house. By the time he began publishing Die Freundin, Radszuweit had already founded several other publication aimed at Germany’s gay communities.

While Die Freundin was the world’s first magazine to target a specifically-lesbian audience, it wasn’t written exclusively by women. Nevertheless, Die Freundin provided a vital forum for Germany’s lesbians, who were typically excluded from the male-dominated homosexual movements of the era. It published articles on lesbian history, the problems faced by lesbian in contemporary Germany, news about the homosexual movement, scientific articles speculating on the origins of homosexuality, fiction, poetry, and reviews of books, plays and movies. Die Freundin‘s stated goal was to “defend the equal rights of women in social life” and to “foster ideal friendships by publishing articles by our readers, and we invite every woman who feels qualified to send articles and works that they feel are suitable.”

A number of articles and letters focused on the plight of lesbians outside of Berlin. One letter went like this: “How I envy my comrades and my friends in Berlin! It must not be too difficult for them to meet a nice girl. There are so many meeting places , cafés, clubs… My only solace is that there are even more women who are abandoned, like me. With longing, I still await my best friend.” Not all lesbians were so unfortunate. One married woman with an understanding husband who allowed her to spend time with her girlfriend, wrote, “I wish that other women, like me, might meet with such understanding with their husbands with respect to their homosexual inclinations and thus be able to live in friendship, tying their life to that of their friend for eternity.”

Unsurprisingly, probably the most important feature in Die Freundin were its personal ads, which allowed women who were either uncomfortable with lesbian bars or who lived outside of the major cities to find other women. Examples included: “Cologne: a woman in the professions, brimming with life, loves, swimming, seeks partner.” Or: Berlin, nurse seeks parter to chat at tea time.” Or: Modern couple, 38-42 years, with comfortable house, seeks a similar couple in Koenigsberg to get acquainted.”

Through its personal ads, articles, ad paid advertisements of cafes, bars and restaurants, Die Freundin provides a rare window into the life of Germany’s lesbians before the rise of Nazism. While political articles were rare during the 1920s, by 1928 Die Freundin began noting, with alarm, a rise in police harassment against gays and lesbians. That year coincided with the Weimar Republic’s enactment of the Law to Protect Youth Against Trash and Smut to counter growing conservative worries over the nations’ moral health. Pressure against Die Freundin and other gay publications only grew worse as the Nazis began enjoying growing political influence. In 1931, Die Freundin published an odd appeal to Adolf Hitler, asking him to explain his remarks on homosexuality (“When we are in power, they will all be hanged or expelled.”), and suggesting that if Hitler’s party adopted a pro-gay platform, “several hundred thousands of homosexuals will be grateful to you.” That humiliating plea obviously fell on deaf ears. By 1932, the classified were gone, and stories of suicides and stepped-up police activity against gay establishments and institutions chronicled an alarming trend. Die Freundin’s last issue came out on March 8, 1933, just a month after Hitler came to power.

[Sources: Florence Tamagne. A History of Homosexuality In Europe: Berlin, London, Paris, 1919-1939 Volume 1 & II. (New York: Algora Publishing, 2006): 77-80.

Clayton J. Whisnant. Queer Identities and Politics in Germany: A History, 1880-1945 (New York: Harrington Park Press, 2016): 114-118]

There are no comments for this post.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.