Fact Checking the Family "Research" Council Straw Man Argument
FDA to reconsider blood donation ban
Is the Tea Party movement good for gays?
The Lies of Martin Ssempa, Part II
Coalition of Ugandan Catholic, Anglican, Muslim, Other Leaders Unite Against Anti-Gay Bill
The alarmist and misleading new headlines about HIV transmission
Another passenger on board LaBarbera's Wackadoodle Train
Tell GoDaddy To Remove Web Site Advocating Murder of LGBT Kenyans
Featured Reports
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than two hundred posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Ben in oakland
January 15th, 2008 | LINK
About 30 years, after a lot of therapy, self-examination, work on myself, and attempts to have a positive relationship with my parents, I finally told my parents in as many words that it was clear to me that their beliefs about homosexuality and what it means to be gay in our society was far more important to them than truth, or fairness, or compassion,and certainly more important than their relationship with their son. They proved my point by never discussing my letter to them and what I had to say. (What I said certainly had anger in it, but the anger was always reined in by the truth. There was no name calling, or viciousness, or anything like that).
Eventually, I realized that the problem was not really my being gay, though that was a convenient hook for them to hang their homophobic hats on. Nor was it me. I had always been a good son, top grades, never any trouble, athlete, musician, the whole shebang. The real problem was our whole relationship, how they saw me, treated me, etc. This was true for my two brothers, one of whom was gay, though not our sister. She got the loot.
Part of that realization was understanding that there would never be anything I could say OR do that would give me a relationship with them that I would want to have– at least not as an adult, though we did pretty well when I was a boy. And it certainly wouldn’t happen as long as I insisted on being a big fag, especially if I insisted that that part of my life was non-negotiable.
Why do I tell my story here, Jim? Because I have to wonder about the father. Which comes first for him? His son and his son’s love, or his belief in that conflagration of bad science, wishful thinking, and prejudice known as LWO? Why did you meet him there? Why would he expect to find an answer there which wouldn’t be underlined by his guilt at turning his son queer, at least as LWO would have him see it? What is their profit motive, if there is one? Why is he still going there when it isn’t working for him?
And finally, why hasn’t he called his son and apologized, explained his love with out the explanations of LWO?
The real problem I have with this whole thing, and which I believe you have accurately called attention to, is that in this particular situation, love isn’t winning out.
It may not even be in the contest.
William
January 18th, 2008 | LINK
“A lot of what Focus on the Family and a lot of what Love Won Out was about was, I think, keeping that wedge there.”
Yes, Jim, how right you are. That’s why I feel nothing but contempt for these anti-gay organizations that portray themselves, with disarming dishonesty, as “pro-family”. They may be pro those families all of whose members are heterosexual; to others they are simply downright pernicious.
Leave A Comment