Box Turtle Bulletin

Box Turtle BulletinNews, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
“Now you must raise your children up in a world where that union of man and box turtle is on the same legal footing as man and wife…”
This article can be found at:
Latest Posts

Anti-Gay Cops Back on Streets in Rochester, NY

Timothy Kincaid

April 9th, 2008

moore.jpgWhen a gay v. police dispute arises it is difficult to know where the truth lies. Based on a long history of abuse, I am often tempted to doubt the claims of officers and to believe gay people, but of course that is not a fail-safe method. Nonetheless, there is a story out of Rochester, NY that disturbs me. While all facts may not be known, there are some things are are not in dispute.

In June 2007 there were five folks walking home from a bar when they were attacked by another group by fist, boot, and iron pipe. They believe that the reason of the attack was because some of the group was gay.

They did what one is supposed to do in this situation; they called the police.

When the officers arrived, they let the attackers go and became hostile to the victims. They refused to take their statements, ordered them to disperse, used homophobic slurs, and arrested some of the victims for disorderly conduct.

When the story broke, the police chief indicated that “mistakes had been made”. But the police union rep continued to defend the actions of the officers.

“This is an example of cops being persecuted for political reasons,” said Mike Mazzeo, a Rochester Police Locust Club union official.

Since that time,

Police later identified the suspects, but did not file charges.

None of the accusers testified before the grand jury, which declined to indict any of the suspects or officers.

The accusers have filed a lawsuit against the city, alleging their civil rights were violated.

From the words of the police union representative, it’s clear that officers in Rochester do not consider it a crime to beat gay people. But insisting that the officers protect them from attack, that’s an criminal offense.

A local television station, 13WHAM, engaged in a campaign to discredit the victims, culminating in an “exclusive” in which they question whether there was a hate crime. They insinuate that arresting the victims was fully justified.

13WHAM News has obtained an internal police department document into last year’s alleged anti-gay hate crime on South Goodman Street. It says there was no hate crime, and raises questions as to whether department leaders misled the public.

Four of the officers were suspended during investigation. And although no conclusions have been made, today we get a hint as to whether there will be any punishment. From the “alleged”-happy 13WHAM:

The four Rochester Police Department officers who were suspended for the way they handled an alleged gay bashing will return to work on Tuesday.

As for the victims of the gay bashing that the officers arrested instead of their attackers?

Two of the alleged victims were arrested by officers the night of the incident and charged with disorderly conduct. Alexander Terrance pleaded guilty. Josh Lieberman is awaiting trial. A third man, Peter Schmitt, received an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal.

Lieberman was supposed to go on trial last week. John DiMarco, his attorney, told the judge that the prosecution may be withholding exculpatory evidence. DiMarco said he obtained a letter from Chief Moore to one of the suspended officers. DiMarco said that letter indicates the officer did not have probable cause to arrest the alleged victims. DiMarco wants to know more about how the chief came to that conclusion. The evidence he is requesting could include portions of the PSS investigation, and grand jury testimony.

“In the context of this case, my client is adamant about his lack of criminal actions,” DiMarco said.

The motto of the Rochester Police Department is

“Serving With Pride”

I would remind the officers of the Rochester police force that pride is what one earns by doing the right thing. When it isn’t earned, it’s just arrogance.



April 9th, 2008 | LINK

“None of the accusers testified before the grand jury, which declined to indict any of the suspects or officers.

The accusers have filed a lawsuit against the city, alleging their civil rights were violated. ”

Are the accusers the ones who were apparently the victims? And if so, why did they not testify before the grand jury when they had the chance? If they didnt testify when they had the chance why would the even file a lawsuit afterwards?
– – – – – –
‘Mistakes have been made’? wha!? If they got gay bashed, how exactly did they mistake the victim with the basher… unless, of course, they retaliated. But… it doesnt seem like they retaliated, rather, they got upset that the officers let the attackers go and charged the victims with something irrelevant to gay-bashing.

Secondly, unless the police was around the corner… why would the attackers stay at the scene?

April 10th, 2008 | LINK


The section of South Goodman Street that the attack took place on is lined with residences. The attackers were originally congregated on one of the porches. (One could speculate that one of the attackers owned or knew the owner of the home.) So it’s entirely reasonable that they would still be in the area when the police arrived.

Also, this blog post doesn’t mention the detail that there were actually two groups attacked that night at the same location. Both groups were coming from the same location (The Avenue Pub, which is a few blocks away from the site of the attack) and headed to the same destination. I belive the first group was attacked five minutes before the second group (sadly, I don’t currently have access to my notes from the Community Forum held to discuss this case last sumemr). It is my understanding that the police were called after the first group was attacked and arrived shortly after the second group was attacked.

For more information, I’d recommend contacting The Gay Alliance of the Genesee Valley, who did their own independent investigation into this matter. I believe that Alexandra Corbus was heavily involved in that investigation, and possibly even heading it up.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.