John Shore Gets It

Timothy Kincaid

April 15th, 2008

johnshore.jpgIn a posting on his blog on CrossWalk, John Shore did not speak out for inclusive theology. But he did something that I think is often missing from the Christian debate about homosexuality; he acknowledged that the conservative viewpoint demands far more of gay Christians than most heterosexuals would ever be willing to give.

I’m not saying that it’s manifestly absurd and even cruel to suggest that everyone within a broad swath of our population spend their lives in emotional and physical isolation. I believe in the tenets of Christianity as ferociously as any Christian in the world. All I’m saying is that, as far as I can tell, we Christians (insofar as we ever speak with one voice) are saying that it is morally incumbent upon homosexuals to spend their lives in emotional and physical isolation. I hear a lot of Christians asserting that gays and lesbians should stop acting like gays and lesbians. But I never hear anyone saying the unavoidable follow-up to that — saying what that really means — which is that gay and lesbian men and women should spend their lives never experiencing what people most commonly mean when they use the word “love.”

Thank you, Mr. Shore.

Wherever one finds oneself on the theological spectrum, it is important that one recognizes and acknowledges exactly what they are demanding of others. This is a conversation in which it is well worth engaging.

John Shore

April 15th, 2008

Thanks, Timothy, for your thoughtful and careful read of my piece. I very much appreciate it.


April 16th, 2008

I can’t imagine how some people could be so cruel to suggest I could love a woman as much as I loved my first love. Plus, how can a group or a government tell me whom I should love? I just don’t work that way. Love is not malleable.


April 16th, 2008

Amazing and definitely noteworty. It shows that there’s possibility of some real dialog.


April 16th, 2008

John Shore:
“…never experiencing what people most commonly mean when they use the word “love.”

Since it is in the news lately, lets use the polygamists as an example. Do you honestly think all those women honestly, “love” the man they were prescribed to couple with? This type of love (if you want to call it that) is manufactured because some people think you can learn to love someone. I have a hard time in coming up with a term for malleable love but it’s not true love. In spite of all the polygamist women who claim their love for their husband is true and genuine…I doubt they know what true love is.

I don’t buy it and I don’t buy that some ex-gays “love” their wives. Sure, they “love” but they don’t adore their wife with a passion that a true heterosexual would dictate. They don’t have those deep feelings they should have for their partner in life…it is more a contrived allegiance via peer pressure as the motivation.

What love is: It is what you write sonnets about. It is when you drop-to-your-knees-in-anguish when you break up with someone. It is the type of love when you finally comprehend the lyrics to Country/Western songs after you experience true love.

Why do some religious people think love can be manufactured or malleable? I get so fed up with co-workers who think I just haven’t met the right girl yet or that I can adjust my attraction on a whim.


April 16th, 2008

thank you John Shore, for putting into elequent words something I’ve wondered about for a long time. So if some people think that (for my own “good”) I should reject any form of romantic love . . . should I just live alone, eat alone, sleep alone? Why should I do this (for my own “good”) based on someone else’s say-so, when my own experience tells me that life is SO much better shared with someone I love?

And I’ve often wondered why heterosexual religious conservatives don’t have the same expectations of divorced people? The new testiment says so much about divorce . . . after all, why can’t divorced people just learn to fall in love with their ex-spouses (the way that gay folks are ‘sposed to fall in love with the right type of person) or live alone the rest of their lives?


April 16th, 2008

“I get so fed up with co-workers who think I just haven’t met the right girl yet or that I can adjust my attraction on a whim.”

To that I would answer…’REALLY? SO YOU CAN BE GAY OR STRAIGHT WHENEVER YOU WISH?’ For christians i would answer the same or what i would answer to an ex-gay(if im tired), ‘SO WHATS WRONG WITH BEING GAY IF I DONT BELIEVE IN ZEUS, errr… GOD?’.

Jason D

April 17th, 2008

cowboy said: “I don’t buy it and I don’t buy that some ex-gays “love” their wives. Sure, they “love” but they don’t adore their wife with a passion that a true heterosexual would dictate. They don’t have those deep feelings they should have for their partner in life…”

two things
(a) They feel the same way about us. They look at us, even the ones who kinda get it, they look at us and go “that can’t possibly be true” –because they can’t see themselves doing it, so they can’t see anyone else doing it, either.

(b) I do agree with you though, I feel sorry for those women. There was a point where I had met the most awesome girl in my life. Someone I could actually date, possibly love. But that nagging thought of “no” kept popping up. There was nothing with which I could hide behind. She was perfect, had she been a man I would’ve proposed on the spot. And that’s just it, I knew, knew, deep in my gut that answering her question “are you attracted to me?” with anything else but “no” would be a lie. That I would be robbing her of a *real* husband, that she deserved to have a man burn for her, and that is why she is my friend, and that is why I was so glad she found such a wonderful husband a few years later :)


April 18th, 2008

I’m going to type something here that I hope my parents will never read: I don’t think they had a marriage based on “love”. Or, at least, at what I understand what true love is all about.

Generally speaking, I think it is rare to find couples who are with their best suited partner (hetero or homo). I can tell by certain nuances…I won’t go into detail here. But, I don’t think many people ever experience that deep abiding “love”. I know I might sound a bit condescending when I say I think I have once experienced what true love is all about.

But…eh…what do I know? Perhaps I’m being naïve.

However, I had a rather normal dating life in school. I look back now and see where I was in denial. I never got to third base with a woman…even with all the opportunities on beer-can flats and with watching submarine races. The epiphany about the real me only came with my first over-night stay at a man’s house when I was an adult and those exploratory/experimenting adolescent days were long gone.

Like Jason D says, I reserve a special place in my heart for some women I know but they’re happier now without me.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.